Originally Posted by
James D
1. Many of the players were sharp and some of the balances were really high. The they will lose it and reload mentality does not apply to many of those bettors. As far as the recreational bettors that would have gotten bailed out I agree many would have just reloaded but the truth is they would have reloaded where they got the best deal. Thats how they ended up at betislands in the first place. If they were not shopping for bonuses and perks they would have been at 5dimes DSI bookmaker etc etc .
2. 1.5 million might not be a huge number for an industry but for a single shop it certainly is a huge number. How would the industry collectively bail out a book? Who gets the client list? Who gets the squares? Do the big shops pay a higher percentage? Doesnt this just encourage people to bet as weaker books with big bonuses if there is a savior down the road if the book closes? Everyone is saying offshore for US is weaker then it ever was, dozens if not hundreds of books have folded before with no bailout, why should BI clients be saved? Goodwill is a very minor factor in the gambling world, on both sides of the ledger. It just is what it is. No one is going to turn down a bonus or a 1/2 point from a book they know is solid because they have loyalty to a book that has no bonuses or perks.