1. #1
    touchback
    touchback's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-08-12
    Posts: 1,227

    Spiro released...

    Well... it appears Spiros has been released on a $2.5 million bond. Got to love the Westerm District of Oklahoma, in Oklahoma City. Anyway, many think the charges will be thrown out of court considering Spiros was part of a real estate deal involving the building Legends was operated of and not part of the ownership or management of the bookmaking service.

  2. #2
    touchback
    touchback's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-08-12
    Posts: 1,227

    Quote Originally Posted by touchback View Post
    Well... it appears Spiros has been released on a $2.5 million bond. Got to love the Westerm District of Oklahoma, in Oklahoma City. Anyway, many think the charges will be thrown out of court considering Spiros was part of a real estate deal involving the building Legends was operated of and not part of the ownership or management of the bookmaking service.
    Or maybe it is still the $1 million, trying to find out if it really did go up too $2.5 million after he had to deal with the Grand Jury... anybody know for sure...

  3. #3
    johnpendred
    johnpendred's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-08-13
    Posts: 415

    link?

  4. #4
    touchback
    touchback's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-08-12
    Posts: 1,227

    OK... I heard it incorrectly. It was Luke King (Bartice King), a owner of Legends, who was released on $2.5 million bond. Is different than Spiro who is still out on the $1 million I believe.

  5. #5
    touchback
    touchback's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-08-12
    Posts: 1,227

    Man, with a 95 page indictment they must of covered everything but this one statement by the Oklahoma US Attorney General is so disrespectful of the laws of sovereign nations and then his assistant basically parroting him... quote> U.S. Attorney Sanford Coats of Oklahoma City said the charges culminated a multiyear investigation by the FBI and Internal Revenue Service. "The defendants cannot hide the allegedly illegal sports gambling operation behind corporate veils or state and international boundaries," Coats said. The WTO ( World Trade Organization) which the US is a member of, has repeatedly stated and ruled in favor of foreign nations offering internet gambling services and sided against the US in about two dozen cases, so I would think that international boundaries do have meaning when applied to US law. This includes the recent Antigua case which the WTO even awarded Antigua a few million dollars in damages against the US. So now Antigua is saying because the US violated WTO agreements they no longer have to honor them either when it comes to US patents and copyrights, allowing Antigua to now reproduce anything they want and sell internationally ignoring any of the US patents and or copyrights and not have to compensate any royalties or fees due to any US individual or company. Also, the Assistant Attorneys General said According to Raman, “These defendants allegedly participated in an illegal sports gambling business, lining their pockets with profits from over a billion dollars in illegal gambling proceeds. Today’s charges demonstrate that we are as determined as ever to hold accountable those involved in facilitating illegal online gambling by U.S. citizens, regardless of where the business operates, or where the defendants reside.” Seriously, what douche of a black hole did these guys come out of to think they determine the laws of other sovereign nations. PLease... if this really was the case then they would try and prosecute and convict a Panamaniam or Costa Rican national... good frickn luck, not gonna happen. Do not have any specific links, it is easy just to Google and a ton of stuff comes up.

  6. #6
    sourtwist
    not a non pro
    sourtwist's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-09-12
    Posts: 9,364
    Betpoints: 548

    Touchback, please learn to fix a common mistake you make regularly.

    Must have...not must of.

    Could have....not could of.

    Should have...not could of.

    Would have....not would of.

    Thanks.

  7. #7
    Scooter
    Scooter's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-15-07
    Posts: 1,159
    Betpoints: 2064

    "Seriously, what douche of a black hole did these guys come out of to think they determine the laws of other sovereign nations."


    The police state which is the USA is the world's largest penal colony.

    The government has no problem kidnapping and torturing, and has declared that USA citizens can be killed by drone strikes.

    It has been running a concentration camp for years at Guantanamo.

    This is nothing for them.

  8. #8
    touchback
    touchback's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-08-12
    Posts: 1,227

    Quote Originally Posted by sourtwist View Post
    Touchback, please learn to fix a common mistake you make regularly.

    Must have...not must of.

    Could have....not could of.

    Should have...not could of.

    Would have....not would of.

    Thanks.
    Will work on it... it is a dialect issue, not a contraction issue. I tend to type how I am thinking which is how speak when posting... instead of composing in a more formal manner.

  9. #9
    sourtwist
    not a non pro
    sourtwist's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-09-12
    Posts: 9,364
    Betpoints: 548

    Everything you write is well written. Once you correct this, you're good to go.

Top