Just for clarity purposes. You'd like the deposits that Heritage freerolled posted back up for a chance to win them too, prior to going to arbitration. You're also only willing to go to a UK arbritrator? There is no panel of three that both Heritage and Cory could agree to where the panel decision in the matter would be final and binding? and again, you are still insistent that for this matter go further she must post back up the deposits that were put in risk 53 of them over 5 months total $20K which had no opportunity to win
Then after these statements later it was company policy and what you always do. Fair question here: are there multiple people controlling the Heritage Insider forum account? Because your positions stated later are vastly different. There are many inconsistencies a couple involve these statements but are other. I could pick them apart one by one if you would like.
Does Heritage Allege these emails are false?
Or do they allege there is two sides to every story? I believe in this dispute a hardline has been taken and who knows why. Maybe Justin7 was frustrated and gave the ruling the way he did. But in time it started to appear clear there is much more to the story here. Justin7 is either busy, or unwilling to comment on these questions. But there is two sides of the story - we've heard one side and so many details were missing, and false statements given as well in the comments that followed (though no evidence they were known to be false, or perhaps reasonable explanations available - but more to the point there are two sides).
But you're now selling this we'll go to a second arbitrator as this how honest of a company you are and are so more than fair, but we'll only do so with one again most likely to side with us. And yes, we're an honest company and this is more than fair. I'm curious conversation about the mediator, arbitration (which was it). Some of your comments seem to imply he could selected anyone he wants to arbitrate the dispute. Or was it a player had their funds held hostage and under duress made the best attempt they could to get someone to look into it, taking whatever limited chance they had to get paid. BECAUSE: Cory alleges before he even asked for Justin7 SBRLou called him on the phone yelling to admit it was him and to knock off the act. Could it be possible he asked for Justin7 this point after Your company and Lou attacked him saying were certain of his guilt. You see those are only allegation but it's the more to two sides of the story point. But you're playing the political roll and presenting as he could of chose anyone he wants.
There's evidence to suggest, though it hasn't been authenticated more than one of J7's associates were already convinced of his guilt before starting.
We established reasonable reasons the player said New York. There is not much logical reasons to say I was in New York other than 1) She wasn't prepared and had no knowledge of the account. Or 2) she was caught in a tough no win situation by the gotchya rules your website includes and the questions asked under duress. IP evidence that is alleged to exist, It appears very likely she can confirm she was near the machine many times the games were played. Also releasing it Cory might be able to prove he was no where near the machines.
But once again you're attempting to say how reasonable and honest of a company you are, by offering up a second opinion but only in a jurisdiction where you're likely to win and want the freerolled deposits added back into the equation.
I could go on and on and someday perhaps will, but no I don't feel you guys are acting fair or honest in this dispute.
My simple comment now others are challenging me to defend was:
Doesn't seem like a very honest book. Probably best to avoid.
That's a simple comment I will standby. You don't seem very honest to me.
Yes you get a lot of support here, but here's an interesting potential explanation from a thread someone bumped today:
Posted November 24, 2009
I had nothing against Heritage, never so much as really ever thought about Heritage. Your handling of this dispute is what made me dislike you and your company a lot. Proof and the player be given a reasonable fair mediation is all I ask, or just come out and say we think he did, it we're not sure, but we're going to steal his money and that's that. I can respect that a lot more than the BS
PR sells that you're using.
Again I was almost baited into making this post. I believe have now supported the reason I think you guys are a dishonest book, and are probably best avoided.