They should close down there poker room its a scam and makes them look like total scum .You have all been warned and shame on you Heritage
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
09-12-12 01:02 AM #1
Heritage poker is total scam
-
09-12-12 01:45 AM #2
You know they allow you to post quite a few charcters in a post?? You look like a complete fool and common sense would lead anyone to believe you're a sore loser in an honest game calling it a scam.
Prove me wrongg. serious interested in knowing why you believe it's shady. I have never played there.
-
09-12-12 02:41 AM #3
care to explain?
-
09-12-12 09:37 AM #4
He had pocket Aces, and he didn't win. Must have been a scam.
Originally Posted by tommygun
Nomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: Hankwins
-
09-12-12 10:04 AM #5
i lost 70/30s for 3 hours straight its obouis its rigged suk my hog Originally Posted by mtneer1212
-
09-12-12 10:19 AM #6
it is definitely rigged..
-
09-12-12 11:20 AM #7
The only way a site could be 'rigged" is having house players like the the absolute poker scandal. Originally Posted by housecloud
-
09-12-12 06:09 PM #8
lol
Originally Posted by mtneer1212
-
09-12-12 08:51 PM #9 Heard it was the same one 5dimes has
Got scammed so bad playing at 5dimes poker room had to close my account.was with them over 5 years and I know that the poker software was a scam.
-
09-12-12 10:19 PM #10
isn't the only way a poker room to scam you is to have super users? software does seem kinda funny how the cards fall at all poker sites but it's all random i believe.
-
09-13-12 03:26 AM #11
just dont play in the casino, everyone knows this
-
09-13-12 09:48 AM #12
It's too easy to hack this stuff. Also, you don't think the IT guys who run these poker rooms and put security in place haven't figured out how to see your cards and have their buddies go in and rape you. It's so stupid to play at any of these online sites. Nothing in this world is THAT secure. And when cash, greed, and non-regulation is involved. Good luck.
-
09-13-12 09:55 AM #13
hitted a tourney at PS last night got first place, all in hands was the worst preflop and lucky on turn or river or runner runner.
-
09-13-12 10:03 AM #14
This is wrong. Originally Posted by Hankwins
Super Users are one way, the above is another, there are plenty more. Your post said "only way" and "could" so just added a second example. Not saying any specific site is or isn't legit. But poker games most certainly can be rigged. Players give way to much credit to the ideas sites would never rig games. Again, not saying anything about this game here, just responding to quoted post.
if
-player1.earnPerUnit > MIN_WIN && player2.earnPerUnit < MIN_LOSS
and
-playability( player1.hand) > MIN_PLAYABILITY && playability( player2.hand) > MIN_PLAYABILITY
and
-finalHandValue( player1.hand ) > finalHandValue( player2.hand )
and
-finalHandValue( player2.hand ) > MIN_HAND_STRENGTH
and
-handWithinDistributionSigma( player1.hand ) && handWithinDistributionSigma( player2.hand )
then
swap( player1.hand, player2.hand)
playability: determines how likely a player is to put money into the pot with a hand based on past hands, or general heuristics in the case of small samples. For almost all players AA would have a playability of 1. For a less skilled player A7o might have a playability of 0.7, for a more skilled player perhaps 0.1.
finalHandValue: the hand value a certain hand will make once the community cards are accounted for
handWithinDistributionSigma: checks whether the distribution of a certain hand for a certain player falls within a certain minimum level of confidence for randomness.
Last edited by prop; 09-13-12 at 10:10 AM.
-
09-13-12 10:10 AM #15
I have to agree with this...I've played on numerous online sites and never taken the amount of beats with the frequency as on this software..I play on Bookmaker, but it's the same poker software.
-
09-13-12 10:12 AM #16
It's clear that some folks just aren't keen on poker and casino games. Something about going to a casino and feeling the chips in your palms seems to instill more confidence.
If you don't like the game, don't play. Simple as that.
-
09-13-12 10:19 AM #17
Lou. I work in IT. Nothing is secure. Somebody built it, so somebody knows how to take advantage of it. It's that simple. People like seeing the cards being physically shuffled and see the cards drawn face down with their own eyes so they know nobody else is privy to the information of what is being drawn next. It has nothing to do with the "feeling of chips in your hand".
On another note. Heritage needs to have a separate password for sportsbook and poker room. Heritage agents ask for passwords all the time for verification and we don't need another slew of betonline chipdumping fiascos.
Reply With Quote
