[jimkotecki]

Bodog now charges a 4-5% fee for any money you deposit. It's getting so you can't bet anywhere without getting robbed.

[cory1111]

hh, you have to stop stalking me...your not my type. I like women.

[HedgeHog]

Pretty pathetic you have to create ghosts to try to influence others.

[cory1111]

i wouldnt know. isnt pathetic being you hh? and more pathetic you follow me everyday like my little b..tch.

[HedgeHog]

I think you do know. Pathetic is posting the same canned message everyday--"avoid EZ blah blah blah". Must not be working because you're resorting to ghosting--which you suck at.

[cory1111]

hh, I rather suck at ghosting(if i was doing that) than the men you hang around with.

[sharpcat]

hh, I rather suck at ghosting(if i was doing that) than the men you hang around with.

I think HH would also prefer that you not suck the men that he hangs out with.

WTF is wrong with you? why are you talking about giving blowjobs tho HedgeHogs friends?

[cory1111]

sharpcat im sorry ,did I make fun of your boyfriend. Ill stop if it bothers you so much. you both are probably sharing the same computer as we speak and taking turns posting..

[sharpcat]

sharpcat im sorry ,did I make fun of your boyfriend. Ill stop if it bothers you so much. you both are probably sharing the same computer as we speak and taking turns posting..

That would be called "ghosting" which you suck tremendously at

You have to be the worst scam artist in offshore history how the fukk do you expect to open multiple accounts with online bookmakers when you can not even sneak in a ghost account on a chat board

I bet you have not made a single penny as a scam artist you probably have done nothing but get yourself blacklisted at every online book.

[cory1111]

is that terminology you use in the gay community(ghosting) when you share a computer. the funny thing is I notice you avoid things very easily when its true about you or your garbage sportsbook. you keeping making up those lies, soon you will see what happens to ezstreet and rx.

[cory1111]

maybe sharpcat you should worry about your own thread over there...looks like you have to make up those fake payouts for easystreet.

[cory1111]

you dont listen well my little tool sharpy. stop making up those fake payouts from ezstreet.

[C.S.]

I just don't get how he hasn't gotten the ban yet.
Ghosting=check
Insulting other posters=check
Making false claims against a company=check

[skrtelfan]

I just don't get how he hasn't gotten the ban yet.
Ghosting=check
Insulting other posters=check
Making false claims against a company=check

What a load of crap. None of Cory's allegations against EZ have been proven false, whereas almost all of their allegations against him have been proven false. And tons of people were insulting him long before he responded in kind, including people like you who never posted on the topic before, but in a matter of days you knew "Oh yeah, Cory111 scammed us a bunch of times!"

[cory1111]

what do you except from c.s.,the kid from indiana jones part II.

[sharpcat]

Cory's welcomed to post, but we ask that he stops copy/pasting posts & stops bumping every thread with EasyStreet in the title all day. It clutters the forum.

He's been limited now to one post every 10 minutes.

What ever happened to this request Lou?

Cory just dick slapped you guys in the face and continues with his copy & paste and bumping every easy thread 30 times a day

[C.S.]

I told you everyone, they cant even keep their employees happy. they must not have enough money to pay their employees(thieves) over there.....

From Post # 18 in this thread. Prove that.

including people like you who never posted on the topic before,

Here
And Here
Some More
See I'm an "OG" when it comes to cory's case.

whereas almost all of their allegations against him have been proven false.

They have been proven not impossible. In the wizardofodds write-up (which was as big a joke as the rx one), he stated he asked one of the BEST video poker players in the world, the Lebron or Wade of video poker if he could pull off what cory did. The guy said 1 in 5 times... So the best of the best can produce results similar 20% of the time. Sorry that doesn't prove cory right and EZ wrong. Here's the dudes response

1000 h.p.h. is attainable by a few players. Perfect play over eight hours is attainable by fewer players. Most experts make some mistakes. If you're looking at possible -- the answer is yes. If you're looking at likely, the answer is no. Could I do it? Perhaps 1 test in 5 — while I'd make a mistake or two the other four times.

Move onto this gem

The probability of 3 royals in 22,000 hands is 1 in 64, definitely not "statistically impossible.

So what we are saying is if cory played 22k hands 64 different times, he'd get this result 1 time. Sure not statistically impossible, then again I could pick every NFL game this season ATS and never lose. It's not impossible.
Parlay the perfect play only achieved by the best of the best 20% of the time, with a result that happens 1 in 64 times... IMO you have a situation that looks funny. So stop saying all the allegations by EZ against cory have been proven false, they have been proven not impossible... which in the land of sane people is a lot different.
Getting back to my point I wrote a few days ago that you've taken up the case to prove it's not true...
Cory is a stiff. What is a stiff? Someone that makes bets and doesn't pay when they lose. If you lose and charge back or NSF your deposit you are a stiff IMO. I could care less about EZ and Cory and the end result, I was just stating what he has done in the past, after people denied that it was true. If anyone from SBR, RX, etc. wanted to see the info in regards to making a decision I'd gladly show them... still would. However, I don't need to explain it to you. Don't believe me if you want. Just know it's true. Now you can get back to trolling.

[pokerplayer22]

From Post # 18 in this thread. Prove that.


Here
And Here
Some More
See I'm an "OG" when it comes to cory's case.


They have been proven not impossible. In the wizardofodds write-up (which was as big a joke as the rx one), he stated he asked one of the BEST video poker players in the world, the Lebron or Wade of video poker if he could pull off what cory did. The guy said 1 in 5 times... So the best of the best can produce results similar 20% of the time. Sorry that doesn't prove cory right and EZ wrong. Here's the dudes response

Move onto this gem

So what we are saying is if cory played 22k hands 64 different times, he'd get this result 1 time. Sure not statistically impossible, then again I could pick every NFL game this season ATS and never lose. It's not impossible.
Parlay the perfect play only achieved by the best of the best 20% of the time, with a result that happens 1 in 64 times... IMO you have a situation that looks funny. So stop saying all the allegations by EZ against cory have been proven false, they have been proven not impossible... which in the land of sane people is a lot different.
Getting back to my point I wrote a few days ago that you've taken up the case to prove it's not true...
Cory is a stiff. What is a stiff? Someone that makes bets and doesn't pay when they lose. If you lose and charge back or NSF your deposit you are a stiff IMO. I could care less about EZ and Cory and the end result, I was just stating what he has done in the past, after people denied that it was true. If anyone from SBR, RX, etc. wanted to see the info in regards to making a decision I'd gladly show them... still would. However, I don't need to explain it to you. Don't believe me if you want. Just know it's true. Now you can get back to trolling.

Actually i think the correct odds on hitting 3 royals in 22k hands has been proven to be approx 1 in 7....similar to hitting a 3 team parlay which people do on a daily basis.

[HedgeHog]

hh, I rather suck at ghosting(if i was doing that) than the men you hang around with.

You sound like OJ Simpson when he promoted his book "If I did it". Everyone knows you ghosted in this thread even those that support you can't be that dumb. Give them some credit and own up to it.

And as far as sucking off my friends, they all prefer you not.

[C.S.]

Actually i think the correct odds on hitting 3 royals in 22k hands has been proven to be approx 1 in 7....similar to hitting a 3 team parlay which people do on a daily basis.

From wizardofodds write-up

Furthermore, it is my understanding that the player actually played 22,000 hands at ESS. The probability of 3 royals in 22,000 hands is 1 in 64, definitely not "statistically impossible." It seems that ESS cherry picked only the 8,862 hands in the sessions where Cory hit a royal.

He consults for online casino software and is pretty much the authority for all things odds related dealing with online casinos.
I'm sure your math is correct though... you should let him know.

[skrtelfan]

C.S., you are completely clueless. First, having been one of the very first posters in that thread actually hurts your credibility, because how could you have figured out so quickly that poster Cory111 was the same person you knew as a scammer when you'd never mentioned it before, including during his previous complaint with Northbet where they accused him of altering a ** receipt and then dropped that one?

Second, as far as playing perfect strategy for 8 hours, EZ never proved he actually played perfect strategy for 8 hours as they never released the full logs. They originally claimed he never paused after hitting the royals and always took the exact same amount of time between hands, but the partial logs released showed that he did take lengthy pauses after hitting the royals, and his time between hands varied between 2 seconds and 6 seconds. Since they lied about that, it's pretty simple to assume they also lied about him playing "perfect strategy for 8 hours." They could simply release the full logs so we could see whether he played perfect strategy and they've refused to do that. So, you know EZ lied about his speed and the time between hands, and yet you still take their word for it that he played perfect strategy for 8 hours. Right.

My simple question to EZ was whether that "perfect strategy" included the 5 penalty card exceptions and they refused to answer.

So what we are saying is if cory played 22k hands 64 different times, he'd get this result 1 time. Sure not statistically impossible, then again I could pick every NFL game this season ATS and never lose. It's not impossible.

Completely clueless. Picking every NFL game ATS is nowhere near as simple as a 1 in 64 shot. 1 in 64 is the equivalent of hitting a 6 team parlay. I guess you think hitting a 6 team parlay is as difficult as picking every game ATS in an entire NFL season???

3 royals in 20000 hands is about a 1 in 64 shot (it's slightly less than 2%), but EZ actually lied about his number of hands played on several occasions. They first tried to claim it was 3 in 8000 but they excluded sessions he played where he didn't hit a royal. Then as evidence, Wilhelm mentioned that he hit 2 royals at some other book, but when the total number of hands was taken together, his real royal rate was something like a 1 in 7 chance.

[sharpcat]

C.S., you are completely clueless. First, having been one of the very first posters in that thread actually hurts your credibility, because how could you have figured out so quickly that poster Cory111 was the same person you knew as a scammer when you'd never mentioned it before, including during his previous complaint with Northbet where they accused him of altering a ** receipt and then dropped that one?
Cut the stupid act!!!

C.S. works in the industry moron it only takes a minute to call someone you know at easystreet and ask who this Cory guy is and than run his name through your books database. Can't believe you have invested so much time and effort into arguing this stupid crap.
Second, as far as playing perfect strategy for 8 hours, EZ never proved he actually played perfect strategy for 8 hours as they never released the full logs. They originally claimed he never paused after hitting the royals and always took the exact same amount of time between hands, but the partial logs released showed that he did take lengthy pauses after hitting the royals, and his time between hands varied between 2 seconds and 6 seconds. Since they lied about that, it's pretty simple to assume they also lied about him playing "perfect strategy for 8 hours." They could simply release the full logs so we could see whether he played perfect strategy and they've refused to do that. So, you know EZ lied about his speed and the time between hands, and yet you still take their word for it that he played perfect strategy for 8 hours. Right.

My simple question to EZ was whether that "perfect strategy" included the 5 penalty card exceptions and they refused to answer.

Exactly you have never seen the play log only the expert witness and Wilheim saw the play log but yet you claim to know everything about the case.

SBR would not even bother to make the play logs public record if the table were turned because they have no requirement to release the play logs to a public forum full of people who have no say so in the arbitration.


Completely clueless. Picking every NFL game ATS is nowhere near as simple as a 1 in 64 shot. 1 in 64 is the equivalent of hitting a 6 team parlay. I guess you think hitting a 6 team parlay is as difficult as picking every game ATS in an entire NFL season???

3 royals in 20000 hands is about a 1 in 64 shot (it's slightly less than 2%), but EZ actually lied about his number of hands played on several occasions. They first tried to claim it was 3 in 8000 but they excluded sessions he played where he didn't hit a royal. Then as evidence, Wilhelm mentioned that he hit 2 royals at some other book, but when the total number of hands was taken together, his real royal rate was something like a 1 in 7 chance.
Again you admit that you have not seen the play logs so how are you so sure about yourself???

[cory1111]

sharpcat everything skrelfan is true. again your the one who is lying with your along with hh. what the truth hurts about your garbage sportsbook.

[HedgeHog]

Cory ghost posts and farts on cakes.

Oh and he's rated F, as in fraud, by all sportsbooks.

And he'll be banned soooooon.

[skrtelfan]

Incidentally, the 1 in 7 number was not my calculation, it came from one of Justin7's first posts in the EZ Street thread. When I calculated the chance of 3 or more successes out of 22,000 trials with a p = 1/40000 using a binomial distribution, I got about 1.8 or 1.9%, but I might have calculated it incorrectly.

There's obviously no "anonymous expert" chosen by the RX, the idiot claimed 3 royals out of 22,000 is a "statistical impossibility" which is clearly not true. Even using the lowest figure given, 1 in 64, it's the equivalent of hitting a 6 teamer, which happens every day. More importantly, they released partial logs and were proven to have lied about his speed and whether he took breaks. Why would they only release partial logs and not full ones if the full ones would prove their claims. The obvious answer is that the full logs would prove Cory made some mistakes.

[skrtelfan]

Also, how in the world would C.S. or anyone else know if it was the same person by that name? I don't have too common of a name but I share a name with a celebrity, for example, and one of the guys in my informal betting group shares a name with someone who's name was being posted around as a stiff on EOG or the RX. C.S. also claimed that Cory had ripped them off using multiple names, so how could he link all those names to the same Cory? It doesn't make sense to be able to do that without a thorough investigation.

It's funny how these books always take weeks to say "We need to investigate" but in this case they figured out who Cory was almost immediately--Wilhelm alleged he'd ripped off 80% of A+ books and 34 different books, but none of these books would step forward except for one CS rep from Youwager who won't even give details about exactly what Cory did, just "he ripped us off using multiple names."

[sharpcat]

Also, how in the world would C.S. or anyone else know if it was the same person by that name? I don't have too common of a name but I share a name with a celebrity, for example, and one of the guys in my informal betting group shares a name with someone who's name was being posted around as a stiff on EOG or the RX. C.S. also claimed that Cory had ripped them off using multiple names, so how could he link all those names to the same Cory? It doesn't make sense to be able to do that without a thorough investigation.

It's funny how these books always take weeks to say "We need to investigate" but in this case they figured out who Cory was almost immediately--Wilhelm alleged he'd ripped off 80% of A+ books and 34 different books, but none of these books would step forward except for one CS rep from Youwager who won't even give details about exactly what Cory did, just "he ripped us off using multiple names."

C'mon Skittles

You know better than most that they could trace him down through his IP address even if there was more than one person who shared the same name.

Seriously between his SBR Judie interview and his 3rd grade level posts it is obvious that Cory is incapable of spoofing his IP address.

Cory1111 is a novice level scam artist and he has given me absolutely no reason to believe otherwise. Somebody with his IQ is not capable of understanding how to hustle a bonus without the aid of a pre programmed bot and a cheat sheet telling him what types of bonuses to look for.

Do not try to cheat casinos out of their generous bonus offers by using pre-programmed bots even though it is against site rules. Do not ********** ************ or create multiple accounts or else your IP address will be snared and you will be flagged as a cheat.

[quagmire]

its remarkable the way these ez shills post in these threads.......they are crooks!!!!!

recap: cory wins 46k ez refuses to pay because they say he used a bot and played for 8hrs straight using perfect strategy with no breaks hitting 3 royals in 8k hands
but he did take breaks and was proven that its very possible to play at that speed and he played 22k hands not 8k its only 7-1 to hit those royals
ez and rx then claimed to have an unamed "expert" who said it was impossible to hit hose royals where it is 7-1 very possible! the rx and ez said the "expert" would answer questions but the "expert" was never heard from again lol.... ez said it would release the play logs BUT surprise they didnt.......5 dimes had a dispute and released their logs the next day but ez has something to hide..
they lied and got caught about the bot so they say cory charged back at other sites and again providing no proof and what makes it worse is that cory paid cash not cc and they even kept his deposit WTF!!!!!!

there's more but thats enough... ez has lied about everything and stole his deposit they deserve to get prosecuted....

ez are crooks that dont pay and will steal your deposit, thats a fact!!!!!!

[cory1111]

sharpy, my IQ? thats funny. you wouldnt want to bet to wager me who has higher IQ would you? oh wait your a scam artist. I am beginning to see that posting is your whole life. you feel like your something special here, when in reality all you are is one big loser that will never amount to anything. Everyday you protecting this garbage sportsbook makes you look worse and worse. Its even funnier that you think your the savant of sportsbooks,yet more like an idiot savant. But now I will officially call you the " idiot savant of posting."

[the_orangekat]

Here's my take so far on EZ Street:

mh217 is right. Their limits suck. I am going to cash out and play elsewhere. They refused to raise my tennis limits over $100...really? My MLB/NFL/NCAAFB sides are $500 limits.

But they do pay from what I heard, they just don't pay con-artists like corey1111 who make the rest of us HONEST people look bad.

'Charge Back' Corey, they call him.

Shame on anyone in this forum who defends a notorious con-man. I hope you all one day get robbed blind by someone just like corey. Maybe that will be the wake up call most of you need.

And to SBR mods, have we checked corey's IP and some of those defending him? I am guessing this guy has multiple ID's, no?

[cory1111]

heres my take on you so far orangekat, your retarded. after all this time you cant even spell my name correctly,or maybe you were talking about somone else?

[cory1111]

orangekat guess your theory on those people defending me is exaggerated.... but u keep practicing my name....maybe one day you might spell it right.

[cory1111]

i guess easystreetsports.com is garbage and everyone that is sticking up for me is legit.

[Monte]

what a newsflash, i never would have guessed that this shit book is garbage

[cory1111]

sharpcat, I mean idiot savant check in.