Originally Posted by
Dark Horse
Lakerboy sounds like a typical American who jumps on the soccer bandwagon and reasons backwards to come to conclusions. Holland is universally admired by soccer afficionados for their attractive style of play, and is often referred to in a positive sense as the best country to never win the world cup. Does that make them overrated? No. They go deep into tournaments, and during their most amazing performance (1974) came out of nowhere as a big tournament surprise. The only time they underperformed was in 1990.
To reach the WC final, or semifinal, is not underperforming. Holland did so in 1974, 1978 (both times in the final against the home team), and in 1998 (semifinal, lost pk shootout to Brazil). To get a truer picture of strength, take away the home teams that won World Cups. Other than Germany and Italy, not one European country has stayed so consistently at the top. England is nowhere near. France and Spain are far less consistent. Based on population, one could only conclude that Holland has vastly overperformed. This is a small country, the size of Denmark (although more densely populated). What business do they have among the world's best soccer nations?! And yet, there they are... Naranja Mechanica. Ready to steal the hearts of more soccer fans with attacking, fast paced, one touch soccer.
I make a clear distinction here between true lifelong soccer fans, from Europe and South and Middle-America, who invariably speak with admiration about Holland, the inventors of total football, and an American trying to catch up. True soccer fans know each other right away. They speak the same language and have the same respect for the game. Unless he grew up in a soccer culture, an American can't even hope to understand this.