Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
I said most liberals, obviously not all you moron.
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
12-21-21 01:03 PM #4936
-
12-21-21 01:04 PM #4937
Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
I didn't mean to type moron in response to those posts. Originally Posted by thomorino
-
12-21-21 01:07 PM #4938
No worries. Originally Posted by thomorino
I see far right and far left shit on most social mediums. I would hate to own any company that has to monitor/manage that shit. Not enough time in the day to look after all the crazy posts from crazy people.
-
12-21-21 01:11 PM #4939
Social media certainly caters to extremes Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
-
12-21-21 01:29 PM #4940
Case in point.. Originally Posted by thomorino
-
12-21-21 01:48 PM #4941
Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
So you think they can just go into someone's business (applebees) and trespass after being told to leave? Do you really think they have the legal right? WTF is wrong with you? You Patriots have no clue of the constitution, what's freedom and what the fukk this country represents. Restaurants can deny service to ANYONE for refusing to follow their rules. No shirt, no shoes, no shot... no service.
Restaurants wouldn't be doing this if not for their GOVERNOR and the MANDATES. Biden must really like that word MAN-DATES? But, perhaps, he should enact a law to change it to CHILD-DATES instead for his pleasure? Did the government tell businesses that people must wear shirts and have on shoes?
Should people that don't wear shirts be arrested for entering w/o one? You forgot to mention how they used to refuse service to blacks? Was that okay too? Common Mr. Liberal tell me! I know 10 times more about the Constitution than you do.
The difference is is this won't end well for you. When the war does start, you will be crawling around on the ground/floors for your life. You will be hiding in your closet, or in some crawl space like the pus*y you are. Then, you will wish, after everything turns to shit.....that you weren't so stupid.
BAAAAAMM!Last edited by hehfest; 12-21-21 at 01:54 PM.
-
12-21-21 01:51 PM #4942
This isn't social media you moron Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 01:57 PM #4943
Really? Originally Posted by thomorino
Do you give your absurd, backwards, misinformed opinions on every subject always claiming to be right?
Do other posters post pics and videos?
Is this the internet where anyone can come in and post all of the above examples?
What is your definition of social media?
-
12-21-21 02:22 PM #4944
https://dolanlawfirm.com/2021/02/no-...sk-no-service/ Originally Posted by hehfest
Back in the 1970s there was the public outrage when businesses first placed signs on their doors saying, “No shirt, no shoes, no service.” This was a response by businesses to keep the long-haired hippies out of their stores and restaurants. There was no state or federal mandate. Many thought businesses were trampling on their civil rights by telling them what they could or could not wear. But businesses have a right to set their own rules for service. The right to refuse service is now an accepted norm as is the phrase.
Similar reactions were heard in the ’80 when California enacted a variety of laws. In 1984, California Supreme Court unanimously upheld a mandatory auto insurance law requiring motorists stopped for traffic violations to prove they have liability coverage or eventually face losing their licenses. Two years later, California’s first seat belt laws took effect on January 1, 1986, and required both drivers and passengers to wear seat belts. It is also a state law that motorcycle riders under age 18 must wear helmets.
Even in the face of scientific studies showing that seatbelt and helmets save lives, there was the outcry of “the government” interfering with your lives.
Still if you are driving a car and have no proof of insurance, you are not exposing anyone to anything lethal. If someone passes you riding a motorcycle without a helmet, their risk exposure is greater than yours- the same for no wearing a seatbelt.
Now, a whole lifetime later, we buckle up as soon as we sit down in a vehicle, make sure that our kids are wearing helmets, and do not dare drive without insurance. We would not even think about walking into a store with bare feet and no shirt on. All of these have become second nature. No personal liberties have been affected and no one has been hurt by following the rules.
Until the pandemic, we gave little thought to “No shirt, no shoes, no service.” The same should be for masks. Businesses have the right to refuse service to those that refuse to enter without masks. Although it is understandable that culturally, the U.S. wasn’t really prepared to wear masks, unlike some countries in Asia where the practice is more common- it has been almost a year since the pandemic paralyzed the nation and wearing a mask should be second nature. Yet, we are still having this debate.
Mask compliance has become a political issue instead of a health issue despite the evidence. “This is a life-and-death issue. Masks, physical distance and hand-washing are the three things we have to reduce the spread of the virus in the absence of a vaccine”, according to Dr. David Abrams, NYU School of Global Public Health.
Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization recommend masks for the general public. Keeping in line with the experts, California Department of Public Health issued face covering guidance in April 2020 that must be followed statewide.
Analysis of data from Johns Hopkins University, California ranked No. 1 among the states where coronavirus was spreading the fastest on a per-person basis. Still protests over wearing masks are now commonplace. As Dr. Abrams pointed out “There’s a certain bravado of being angry and defying requirements to wear a mask.”
- “Costco Karen,” for instance, staged a sit-in in a Costco entrance after she refused to wear a mask, yelling “I am an American … I have rights.”
- An unruly crew marched through Target yelling “Take off your masks, we are not going to take it anymore.”
- “Burn the Mask” protestors blocked the entrance of Trader Joe’s in Fresno to causing the store to close early.
- A protestor at a Ralph’s in Los Angeles called a shopper wearing a mask a “mask Nazi.”
- In a mall in Century City, anti-mask protesters tried to force their way into several stores causing workers to be barricade themselves inside stores to keep out protesters.
Despite the protestations, wearing a mask just like wearing seat belts, shoes and a shirt, does not violate your rights. The government has a right to enact laws to protect the health and safety of the public. That is the quintessential role of the government.
To the extent that protestors object that masks violate their right to liberty (“my body, my choice”), they should direct their attention to Jacobson vs. Massachusetts (1905) 197 U.S. 11, the Supreme Court upheld the state’s smallpox vaccination requirement. The case has not been overturned. The case clearly explains why mask mandates do not violate any constitutional right to privacy, health, or bodily integrity. The court ruled that the requirement didn’t violate Jacobsen’s right to liberty or “the inherent right of every freeman to care for his own body and health in such way as to him seems best.” The court added that “[t]here are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good. On any other basis, organized society could not exist with safety to its members.”
The case makes it clear that the ideals of limited government do not absolve us of our social obligation to protect each other. Simply put, we do not have a constitutional right to infect others.
For now, masks are necessary. Common sense suggests that If there is no choice, we will wear masks. We all will be safer if businesses work together to make “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Masks, No Service” the norm in California.
-
12-21-21 02:26 PM #4945
This is a forum you moron. Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 03:21 PM #4946
Social media is a collective term for websites and applications that focus on communication, community-based input, interaction, content-sharing and collaboration. Originally Posted by thomorino
People use social media to stay in touch and interact with friends, family and various communities. Businesses use social applications to market and promote their products and track customer concerns.
On your knees bitch..
-
12-21-21 03:48 PM #4947
Theres no collaboration here you moron, it's individuals posting. Shut the fuk up you moron. Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 03:57 PM #4948
Communication, interaction??? Originally Posted by thomorino
Its underlined and in blue because I copy and pasted you inbred fukking moron...
Wow!!!
You are THE dumbest human being alive..
BTW; There is collaboration on here between posters..
You're just the last person anyone wants information or ideas from...
-
12-21-21 04:16 PM #4949
That is the definition of old liberals. The people who are Liberals now, are actually not even liberals. They are radical marxist. Both in name, as well as their dogmatism that runs parallel with their ignorance. Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
-
12-21-21 04:32 PM #4950
-
12-21-21 04:38 PM #4951
Biden just said that giving inaccurate information regarding the virus or vaccine is immoral. pic.twitter.com/90gLvmk7wc
— Maze (@mazemoore) December 21, 2021
-
12-21-21 04:49 PM #4952
-
12-21-21 05:19 PM #4953
Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 05:29 PM #4954
She’s looks like needs a good dicking lol Originally Posted by DwightShrute
-
12-21-21 05:56 PM #4955
Liberals are now not liberals... Originally Posted by eidolon
-
12-21-21 05:59 PM #4956
You haven’t seen your 2 incher in a decade. She wouldn’t touch you. Originally Posted by mngambler
-
12-21-21 06:22 PM #4957
You are a moron who is obsessed with me. Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 06:33 PM #4958
Says the guy with 3 chins, we’ve all seen the pics tubby Originally Posted by vitterd
Points Awarded:
KnuckleHeadz gave mngambler 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
-
12-21-21 06:46 PM #4959
Is SBR forum a form of social media skippy? Originally Posted by thomorino
-
12-21-21 07:26 PM #4960
AOC needs more flair! Originally Posted by DwightShrute
-
12-21-21 07:48 PM #4961
and a load on the chin Originally Posted by eidolon
-
12-21-21 07:52 PM #4962
Not with that little thing you got, dick. Originally Posted by mngambler
-
12-21-21 08:26 PM #4963
Find someone else to stalk you me tally I'll dumb shit. Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 08:50 PM #4964
Originally Posted by thomorino
No truer words were ever spoken skippy...
-
12-21-21 09:00 PM #4965
[QUE=Buckandadime;30698863]I am a mentally ill dumb shitpy...[/QUOTE]
You are a moron
-
12-21-21 09:00 PM #4966
You are a moron Originally Posted by Buckandadime
-
12-21-21 09:01 PM #4967
hey it's panty sniffer, word is you've been arrested for trying to steal panties, what sick f*ck you are, should be shot Originally Posted by rkelly110
-
12-21-21 09:18 PM #4968
Its pathetic that you resort to editing other poster's post's and it still takes you more than one try to get it right.. Originally Posted by thomorino
All we do is quote you directly and we laugh and laugh and laugh..
All at your expense skippy!!!
-
12-21-21 09:23 PM #4969
-
12-21-21 10:05 PM #4970
COVID is in the 9th inning with 2 outs. They have gotten about all the mileage they can out of it. I am more worried about what they will release next time.
Reply With Quote
