1. #36
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    Since the revolutions of the late 18th >early 20th century, money has come to rule
    government and societal formation. The Ancien Regime, or Christendom, did not emphasize
    money, and it was not elevated. Beginning in the 1500s, with the Reformation in Northern Europe
    and the funding of Middle/Southern European forays into the New World, finance wiggled its way
    into most secular monarchies. Jewish power through the gradual permeation of usury and fractional
    reserve lending, coupled with a shift in high society's philosophical underpinnings, transformed our world.

    What resulted, formed by the alliance of Freemasons, Illuminati (the real one), and Jews was the slave trade,
    complicated debt contracts (now legal), British naval power to enforce taxes and debt contracts, the Napoleonic
    Wars, establishment of capital markets (not real goods markets), insurance via the Dutch Jews and a worldwide
    drug/vice trade that was not made unlawful by the new political leaderships.

    A giant turn from need-based, cooperative communities such as trade guilds to corporations, canon law
    replaced in the courts by secular, political law as envisioned, practiced and written by the revolutionaries.
    "Workers", or, more properly, "wage earners" without guild protection and oversight were given "jobs"
    by the capitalist elite, who were selected personally by the bankers, as they are today.
    Jefferson and Lincoln were very much against what they saw concerning wage slavery. It was not what America was supposed to be. Some of our presidents fought against the powers of high finance, especially the European high finance, a Jewish operation to this day. Capitalism as it exists today, and "communism" as it existed in the early Soviet Union were Jewish affairs.

    To say "communism" is only Bolshevism, or Menshevism, is to disregard very important distinctions.
    In Latin America, and in pre-colonial North America, communalism was practised with an idea of harmony and cooperation, this mentality also existed in the Southern Agrarian movement, exists today in some Latin American countries, albeit always under assault by the NWO, which seeks to control the whole world.

    Capital when separated from labor is sinful. Capital that grows and is made without effort, and compounds over time to such a degree that a miniscule percentage of people own more wealth than BILLIONS, is a Monopoly board game played on the planet Earth that is over. 99.99% of the players have been eliminated.
    This result is the veritable destiny of capitalism.
    It is an unsustainable situation that will be rectified, eventually, by blood or by political remission.
    Last edited by Snowball; 07-21-18 at 08:13 AM.

  2. #37
    dante1
    dante1's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-31-05
    Posts: 38,640
    Betpoints: 392

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy117 View Post
    Who is defending communism here?
    certainly not me, it is a losing economic system, I am simply stating that the idiot brooks thinks these isms are the same, they are not. they are different. he attempts to defend his stupidity with a website quotation and the exact quotation tells him in black and white they are different. and he claims success.

  3. #38
    Andy117
    Andy117's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-07-10
    Posts: 9,511
    Betpoints: 25689

    Quote Originally Posted by brooks85 View Post
    before you ask questions you should make sure you've passed ESL.

    You are on record as a habitual liar and someone who can not read the English language like when you read a quote by Biden and then proceeded to lie about what he said.

    You're either a low IQ liar or a low IQ idiot. That is what you have shown.

    You're wrong on all of those counts. That has been shown numerous times. Either way, no one is defending communism within this thread.

First 12
Top