Originally Posted by
Auto Donk
haven't read the article yet, but have always set forth the proposition that all rifles are "assault" weapons.....
as for "mean"/bad ass looking military style weapons with bayonet attachments and all the other bullshit that they used to define "assault" weapons for purposes of banning them (most of which had little to do with the lethality of the weapons involved), the focus of the liberals has always been misplaced.
I own several rifles that are far more deadly, more accurate, more powerful, etc., than any so-called "assault weapon" that the liberals had put on their original list, and the list they'd like to ban now....
my Remington 7mm mag has a bullet and casing that is twice the nearly twice the size of an 87 grain .223 caliber bullet, which most "assault weapons" are calibered for.... Bigger bullet, longer range generally, particularly when I'm firing it while looking through a leupold 3x9 variable scope....
No person in their right mind would prefer to be shot with my 7 mag instead of a less accurate, .223 caliber assault weapon....
all weapons are made to assault, whether it be targets, animals, or other humans