question of the day: is a porno chick really a "star" simply because she makes one or two pornos?
I know the obvious answer is "yes", because any one babe who does so is always called a "star." If any of you have ever had a girl from your high school wind up in porn, you know everyone says she that "became a porn star" -- even if she made only one poorly done amateur porno that was filmed by some seedy So-Cal wannabe porno director working out of his sleazy one bedroom san fernando valley apartment who promised her "she'd make it big" if she blew him while he recorded it on his iphone..... she probably didn't even swallow in it, and still had her tiny pre-boob-job A-cup , so how the fck could society really consider her a "star"????
When we really analyze the situation, it's clear they don't meet traditional "star" requirements (fame, money, notoriety, etc.) Take the triple anal russian from my other post, for example.... she has no fame, no money, no nothing (well, other than a bad coke habit and a sore ass.....) So, I submit to you that a woman who makes only a few pornos here and there is not a star...... and this is particularly true for those triple anal hos for whom you can jumpshoot an orange into their asses from 18 feet away and hit nothing but the bottom of the net!!!