[PhillyFlyers]

Fat piece of shit goes around talking bad about Rand Paul and trashing the state of Kentucky. Did the fat fukk ever stop to take a look at what a piece of fukkin shit his own state is?

How can anyone take seriously a guy who goes around saying shit like libertarianism in the GOP is a "very dangerous" trend?

Is he fukkin kidding me?

He just basically told the world he fears freedom. LOL what an asshole.

People like him are exactly the reason why the GOP can't win the white house anymore.

How many of these fukkin losers saying the same shit all the time is the GOP going to serve up?

McCain, Romney, Christie......FUKKIN LOSERS!

[SamDiamond]

I don't give a fuk what he said about that Rand Paul.

Since this is a gambling board, I can only give Christie credit for being the one willing to fight PAPSA to the end.

I don't care if he pisses on Paul or his old man.

Crush PAPSA and Christie is a god.

[PhillyFlyers]

I don't give a fuk what he said about that Rand Paul.

Since this is a gambling board, I can only give Christie credit for being the one willing to fight PAPSA to the end.

I don't care if he pisses on Paul or his old man.

Crush PAPSA and Christie is a god.

Christie is a fat jerkoff who runs a police state called new jersey. He's a political fukkin coward. He'd rather make some bullshit story up about Rand Paul not coming to new jersey to have a political discussion with the families of the victims of 911 rather than stand and defend the Constitution like a real man would.

He's a political fukkin hack and if he wins the GOP nomination the GOP will get crushed. Again.

[SamDiamond]

Christie is a fat jerkoff who runs a police state called new jersey. He's a political fukkin coward. He'd rather make some bullshit story up about Rand Paul not coming to new jersey to have a political discussion with the families of the victims of 911 rather than stand and defend the Constitution like a real man would.

He's a political fukkin hack and if he wins the GOP nomination the GOP will get crushed. Again.

How does the Governor of New Jersey impact anything in Philadelphia?

He won't win the GOP nomination because the GOP social conservatives won't allow it.

[rkelly110]

As a Dem, I'm loving every minute of those idiots mouth battles.

[PhillyFlyers]

How does the Governor of New Jersey impact anything in Philadelphia?

He won't win the GOP nomination because the GOP social conservatives won't allow it.

NJ does impact Philadelphia. Directly. We are right across the river from them. We've competed with them since colonial times. Many former Philadelphians now live in New Jersey as well.

He should never be considered for the GOP nomination. NOT EVEN CONSIDERED. He would set the GOP back another 10 years.

Rand Paul is easily the best candidate the GOP has. He should be the nominee. He's the only one with populous appeal that can win democrats over in the entire GOP.

No democrat will ever consider crossing over to vote for Christie and the GOP better wake the fukk up and realize it.

[SamDiamond]

NJ does impact Philadelphia. Directly. We are right across the river from them. We've competed with them since colonial times. Many former Philadelphians now live in New Jersey as well.

He should never be considered for the GOP nomination. NOT EVEN CONSIDERED. He would set the GOP back another 10 years.

Rand Paul is easily the best candidate the GOP has. He should be the nominee. He's the only one with populous appeal that can win democrats over in the entire GOP.

No democrat will ever consider crossing over to vote for Christie and the GOP better wake the fukk up and realize it.

Philly, you missed the question. How does any policy decision that Christie makes, or comments he makes, affect you?

And, I have another question.

Do you really think Hilliary Clinton is going to lose to anyone the GOP nominates? If she runs, it will be a bloodbath for the GOP no matter who they nominate.

[PhillyFlyers]

Philly, you missed the question. How does any policy decision that Christie makes, or comments he makes, affect you?

And, I have another question.

Do you really think Hilliary Clinton is going to lose to anyone the GOP nominates? If she runs, it will be a bloodbath for the GOP no matter who they nominate.

I just explained it to you. Philadelphia has been in competition with the state of NJ since colonial times. What NJ decides affects our decisions eventually somewhere down the line. If you need an example, years ago in the early 80s, NJ decided they wanted people to move from Philly into NJ. They decided the best way to do that was to lower property taxes and make new construction homes as affordable as possible. As a result of that decision, Philadelphia lost over 1 million people to NJ.

Now, fast forward to the present. NJ has the highest property taxes in the country. As a result, people have been moving back into Philly. This affects businesses, communities, neighborhoods, basically everyone.

As to your second question...it depends on who her opponent is.

If she's going against Christie, she's pretty strong against him because she can counter his arguments effectively enough to make people stay away from him.

If she's going against Rand Paul, then Paul would eat her alive in the debates.

[SamDiamond]

I just explained it to you. Philadelphia has been in competition with the state of NJ since colonial times. What NJ decides affects our decisions eventually somewhere down the line. If you need an example, years ago in the early 80s, NJ decided they wanted people to move from Philly into NJ. They decided the best way to do that was to lower property taxes and make new construction homes as affordable as possible. As a result of that decision, Philadelphia lost over 1 million people to NJ.

Now, fast forward to the present. NJ has the highest property taxes in the country. As a result, people have been moving back into Philly. This affects businesses, communities, neighborhoods, basically everyone.

As to your second question...it depends on who her opponent is.

If she's going against Christie, she's pretty strong against him because she can counter his arguments effectively enough to make people stay away from him.

If she's going against Rand Paul, then Paul would eat her alive in the debates.

Rand Paul? Seriously?

Come on man. You did the same thing with his daddy.

The Pauls do not have an audience. You have a better chance at winning the GOP nomination than Paul does.

[PhillyFlyers]

Rand Paul? Seriously?

Come on man. You did the same thing with his daddy. You had such a hard on for Daddy Paul, and how did that turn out?

Rand Paul is a gimic. He plays to a certain audience, and you seem to be part of that audience.

Ron would have won the GOP nomination if the GOP bosses hadn't fixed the vote in Maine. Even Obama said he was amazed at what happened in Maine.

The Constitution isn't a gimmick. What Hillary and Christie push for is.

[Snowball]

The problem is that an increasing number of "Americans" do not care
about personal freedoms anymore.
I agree that Rand Paul would garnish far more support nationwide than
Christie would, Paul would bring out the minions of pissed off real Americans.
Still, until they do something about the voting machines it can be rigged for Hillary/Bill,
or for Christie.

[SamDiamond]

The problem is that an increasing number of "Americans" do not care
about personal freedoms anymore.
I agree that Rand Paul would garnish far more support nationwide than
Christie would, Paul would bring out the minions of pissed off real Americans.
Still, until they do something about the voting machines it can be rigged for Hillary/Bill,
or for Christie.

Then why didn't his dad make more of a national splash?

Did you see the numbers Paul pulled in places like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania?

What is the difference between Ron and Rand? Except for age of course.

Christie won't get the nomination for the same reasons Rudy couldn't. The right wing social conservatives would crush both of them.

Throughout the entire GOP primary in 2012, Ron Paul finished behind Newt for cripes sake. Paul didn't carry a single state, not even his home state voted for him.

A knucklehead like Rick Santorum had a full 10% on Ron Paul in the GOP. That's scary.

[PhillyFlyers]

Then why didn't his dad make more of a national splash?

Did you see the numbers Paul pulled in places like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania?

What is the difference between Ron and Rand? Except for age of course.

Christie won't get the nomination for the same reasons Rudy couldn't. The right wing social conservatives would crush both of them.

More of a national splash? Did you know that Ron Paul raised more money from average American citizens than all the other GOP candidates combined?

You know who funded Romney? Super PACs and corporations, the same groups who are funding Hillary and Christie.

[SamDiamond]

More of a national splash? Did you know that Ron Paul raised more money from average American citizens than all the other GOP candidates combined?

You know who funded Romney? Super PACs and corporations, the same groups who are funding Hillary and Christie.

And all that money did what?

[PhillyFlyers]

Some national splash....and what did those americans get for those contributions? Paul got 4 fukin delegates.

FOUR.

Jon Huntsman won 3.

Remember him? Didn't think so.

Why would anyone fund his kid for the same results?

Because the vote was fixed.

And what happened even after all that fixing the GOP bosses did to ensure that Romney got the nomination?

He got crushed in the election.

[SamDiamond]

Because the vote was fixed.

That's funny.

Corporations can fix the vote for Romney, but they couldn't manage to get Obama voted out of office?

And how do these "Corporations" decided who gets to win, Obama or Romney?

And if it is as rigged as you say, why bother even voting for Rand Paul, if you already know the result?

[Snowball]

Then why didn't his dad make more of a national splash?

Did you see the numbers Paul pulled in places like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania?

What is the difference between Ron and Rand? Except for age of course.

Christie won't get the nomination for the same reasons Rudy couldn't. The right wing social conservatives would crush both of them.

Throughout the entire GOP primary in 2012, Ron Paul finished behind Newt for cripes sake. Paul didn't carry a single state, not even his home state voted for him.

A knucklehead like Rick Santorum had a full 10% on Ron Paul in the GOP. That's scary.

Rand does better with the Zionists and Evangelicals. Even though he is only patronizing
them with words, it has to be done, or you can't get anywhere in this country.

[PhillyFlyers]

That's funny.

Corporations can fix the vote for Romney, but they couldn't manage to get Obama voted out of office?

And how do these "Corporations" decided who gets to win, Obama or Romney?

And if it is as rigged as you say, why bother even voting for Rand Paul, if you already know the result?

The vote in Maine was fixed. That is a fact. Whether you find it funny or not doesn't matter.

Votes can be manipulated easily. Just because they can doesn't make a difference to me.

[SamDiamond]

The vote in Maine was fixed. That is a fact. Whether you find it funny or not doesn't matter.

Votes can be manipulated easily. Just because they can doesn't make a difference to me.

By the time Maine's Caucus rolled around, Romney already had a chuck of delegates.

On January 31st, Romney won Florida by getting 46% of the vote, Paul managed just 7% in Florida.

And it wasn't Romney that won the early February states, it was Santorum. Paul managed just 12% of the vote in Colorado and Missouri, with those numbers, he had no chance by the time Maine had it caucus.

What would have been significant about Paul winning more in Maine than he did?

[PhillyFlyers]

By the time Maine's Caucus rolled around, Romney already had a chuck of delegates.

On January 31st, Romney won Florida by getting 46% of the vote, Paul managed just 7% in Florida.

And it wasn't Romney that won the early February states, it was Santorum. Paul managed just 12% of the vote in Colorado and Missouri, with those numbers, he had no chance by the time Maine had it caucus.

What would have been significant about Paul winning more in Maine than he did?

To say that he would have had no chance had he won Maine is wrong.

A lot of primaries are about momentum. Santorum had it after he won Iowa.

What the GOP bosses did in Maine was disgusting.

Who knows how far it went? Maine is the one we know about but it could have extended to other states as well.

Paul was the people's choice. There is no question about this.

[SamDiamond]

To say that he would have had no chance had he won Maine is wrong.

A lot of primaries are about momentum. Santorum had it after he won Iowa.

What the GOP bosses did in Maine was disgusting.

Who knows how far it went? Maine is the one we know about but it could have extended to other states as well.

Paul was the people's choice. There is no question about this.

Let's be honest here. He was "10%" of the GOP people's choice.

Acting as if Maine would have changed the outcome is silly, its like saying if Houston beats Boston tonight, they can make a World Series run.

[PhillyFlyers]

Let's be honest here. He was "10%" of the GOP people's choice.

Acting as if Maine would have changed the outcome is silly, its like saying if Houston beats Boston tonight, they can make a World Series run.

I am being honest. You're not.

Paul was the people's choice. The only candidate in either party whose campaign was almost completely funded by average citizens.

Romney was backed by big money corporations and super pacs. Just like Obama was and Hillary and Christie now.

Ron Paul was the people's choice.