Originally Posted by
JayHorne3
There has to be a time of non-existence or there could not a creation of anything. In my opinion this is the biggest argument for a pro god vs. no god debate. I am not saying you have to believe in a book with 0 scientific backing but you also can not say with certainty that a supreme power initiated the creation of the universe. If you could, you would have to explain how abolute nothing was made into the particles that caused creation or led to it should I say. And I believe one poster suggested science has explained this, please elaborate. Please do not give me the Stephen Hawking explanation as has already been shredded by scientific debate. Hawking tried to explain the existence of anti-matter in today's world but this would not have worked in a world at the time of non-existence. Therefore, this is the part of the debate where nobody is going to be able to "prove or explain" with absolute certainty. It is just my personal opinion, that existence can not evolve from non-existence without the materials needed for creation. That along with many other factors leads me to believe in God. Now how God interacts with humans is an entirely different debate.