And here comes the race card
I did not witness anything but according to U.S. law the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that GZ is not telling the truth and that he hunted down and murdered TM.
I have yet to hear you use factual evidence to support your belief that GZ set out with a depraved mind and murdered TM. I have yet for you to disprove that TM passed on his 5 minute window to go home and avoid the situation and decided to go back and confront GZ.
All I hear from you is the same old 1 liners about race, skittles, and iced tea.
Unlike yourself I do not claim GZ to be innocent or guilty because that would require me to make assumptions. I am simply saying that there is no evidence to suggest that GZ's versions of events is not what happened.
If you want to sit back and assume that within the 2 minute window before police arrived on the scene that (GZ broke his own nose, fabricated a story that was so believable that the original prosecutor felt that he was telling the truth, and he was also able to pass a lie detector test 2 times) then good for you. Maybe Al Sharpton and Benjamin Crump will sell you some of that ocean front property in arizona also.
So save me your race card and your blanket statements deflecting from the facts.
I will stick to the proven facts that we have in the case and you can keep deflecting away from that by telling us about Trayvons butterfly collection and how innocent he was.