1. #1
    probettor1
    probettor1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-22-11
    Posts: 1,985

    Nite owl 66% winning percent in the long run? I say is impossible. Am I wrong?

    Nite owl sports I'm very sorry about all this. We have caused a lot of damage to each other. Good thing is I never said a lie. I said "I bet you are wunderdog or his servant". I didn't say you were him. The false info in your leaderboard was copy and paste so it is impossible to be a lie. I did bought from you and I can prove I did. If you get the forum to remove the negative posts I posted about you is not my problem. I will ask them to do so I you step foward and show your face to the world. Lets see if you have the courage to scam people and let them know who you are. By the way saying that "no warranties are implied" has nothing to do with the fact of using your info for illiegal betting. It just cover you from being sue for a scam. it is funny your disclaimer is almost impossible to be seen. You can threaten me all you want I even advised friends and family of our discrepancies in case you decide play the gangster card. I can give you my phone and address. You scammed me and I'm not afraid of you. You are the one who need to be afraid of the people you are scamming. Not from me, you are not worth a spit from me.

    What really is funny here is a guy claimming to win a 66% of his POD picks apparently has lost most of his clients(your alexa traffic rating is as bad as it gets) and is crying out loud for a bad review, plus the fact that you claim to be a lawyer. 66%? The following analysis is just a rough average of how much money you could make if you had that %.
    Innitial bankroll 100
    100 won 200
    100 won 300
    100 lost 200
    Out of your 2000 POD picks in one year you would have this cycle over 600 times. You would have made 60000 out of the first 100. If you add 100 from you salary each bet that would be an average of 30000 per each 100 added but 34% would be losts so it will be about 1300 times $100 multiplied by 30000 you have over 30 millions with a innitial bankroll of 200.000. Once you have 30 millions you repeat the cycle with a 30 million bankroll and you would win 4500 millions. For the third year $675000.000000(already 10 time the fortune of bill gates). The forth year $101250000.000000.( I dont think there is that amount of money in world)
    Do you realy need to sell picks.?
    My analysis has probably some major mistakes but if anyone correct it the number will be still over the billions and billions by the 4th year.

  2. #2
    Jaug
    1 in 2.7 mill
    Jaug's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-11-09
    Posts: 3,086
    Betpoints: 2977

    You cannot win 66% in the long run. Totally absurd.

  3. #3
    ACoochy
    Am i serious? Are you serious?
    ACoochy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-19-09
    Posts: 13,949
    Betpoints: 5324

    66% is attainable longterm BUT not as a everyday capper betting spreads...

  4. #4
    probettor1
    probettor1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-22-11
    Posts: 1,985

    This cappper has most of his pick in the -110 range, besides he give you units where he claims to have an even bigger number that the number of overall winning games. That make my formula using 100 to 200 pretty close to his claims.

  5. #5
    frizzelli
    frizzelli's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-06-10
    Posts: 8,915
    Betpoints: 12

    Fuk off tout

  6. #6
    B1GER1C828
    Bostoneric
    B1GER1C828's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-31-07
    Posts: 10,244
    Betpoints: 318

    Quote Originally Posted by ACoochy View Post
    66% is attainable longterm BUT not as a everyday capper betting spreads...
    ya if i fukin bet -2000 favs everytime ya its achievable. unreal

Top