[RudyRuetigger]

Sitting at the 2/4 table right now. Come on over.

acr is down right now

do not lie

[mpaschal34]

Sat for 45 minutes in the SBR room. You were a no show.

Figures.

[RudyRuetigger]

Sat for 45 minutes in the SBR room. You were a no show.

Figures.

you a big fukkin guy wanting to take me on at 2/4 points??

why not accept the challenge instead

[bobbywaves]

why not accept the challenge instead

Nobody is interested in winning your pathetic 1 point, despite your false advertising of 10k.

What don't you understand about this?

Hint: Generate pts before offering a challenge broke dikk.

[mpaschal34]

You know Rudy’s completely lost it when I’m strongly agreeing with Waves.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Speaking of idiots, thanks for the 29k pts/$1,000+ bitcoin loser.

I can't take any credit for your losing investment in bitcoin, but you're welcome for losing our challenge, it was certainly a gift in several ways. Even though it was for chump change, it was a bit rough for a minute...but I appreciate you quickly retaking the title of biggest loser when you lost your challenge with DS. Doubt that record will be beaten any time soon

I just checked in

why did I say bobby should stay in his lane which is far right?

well it is not democrat/republican

it is when you are on the fukkin highway

far right lane is for grannies and morons that have their face by the wheel staring straight ahead

Bobbo's not even on the highway; he's puling a bobsled on the shoulder of the road, trying to tell everyone that it's actually faster than a car because he's on some top 15 road-shoulder-bobsled-pulling list

As for the challenge...mpas has far better things to do in life (same with most other people who could provide an interesting game), and bobbo is too chickenshit after getting spanked in his last several challenges (not to mention he's too afraid to sit and play a holdem cash game), so looks like no takers. Bobbo aside, I'd say nobody is afraid, just uninterested. Even if someone takes you up on it, I'm confused what you're trying to achieve, considering you belittled SBR poker stakes in the same thread you bragged about being undefeated at them

[bobbywaves]

I can't take any credit for your losing investment in bitcoin

Losing investment? You can easily check my store purchases to see when I bought bitcoin (7k). Are you ignorantly suggesting I bought in higher than the current 11k+ price?

You can take credit for my winning bitcoin investment. Since your losing poker bet & my other side bets, were responsible for a grand total of 35k.

but you're welcome for losing our challenge

It was my pleasure kicking your ass.

[RudyRuetigger]

As for the challenge...mpas has far better things to do in life (same with most other people who could provide an interesting game), and bobbo is too chickenshit after getting spanked in his last several challenges (not to mention he's too afraid to sit and play a holdem cash game), so looks like no takers. Bobbo aside, I'd say nobody is afraid, just uninterested. Even if someone takes you up on it, I'm confused what you're trying to achieve, considering you belittled SBR poker stakes in the same thread you bragged about being undefeated at them

wtf are you on?

these guys play sbr poker 1-1.5 hrs per day, 5times a week and clear their rollover after that

I'm offering a bet with what, 3 hours total amt of time played

don't give me this shit everyone is so busy when theyre wasting 8-10hrs at sbrpoker per week

[RudyRuetigger]

https://imgur.com/a/htEA3

[Triple_D_Bet]

Losing investment? You can easily check my store purchases to see when I bought bitcoin (7k). Are you ignorantly suggesting I bought in higher than the current 11k+ price?

You can take credit for my winning bitcoin investment. Since your losing poker bet & my other side bets, were responsible for a grand total of 35k.



It was my pleasure kicking your ass.

I'm pretty sure sharpangles already pointed out the idiocy involved in bragging about buying bitcoin at 7k, and I'm sure you lack the desire and ability to understand, so we'll just continue to chuckle as you.

Yup, you won 35k off our challenge...I'd be more embarassed if you didn't turn around and lose over double that to DS in a wager you proposed yourself and lost in hours Until you pay DS what you're stiffing him, you can't claim a profit on anything; it's DS' money you're stealing.

wtf are you on?

these guys play sbr poker 1-1.5 hrs per day, 5times a week and clear their rollover after that

I'm offering a bet with what, 3 hours total amt of time played

don't give me this shit everyone is so busy when theyre wasting 8-10hrs at sbrpoker per week

Playing a daily with few to no shits given, and the occasional rollover (definitely much less than 3 hours a day), takes far less effort than playing heads up for rollz. Dailies can easily be done while getting other work done, heads up definitely not....that's my point.

Not saying the time isn't worth it, sounds entertaining...if I had more time I'd happily take ya on for shits and giggles. Not scared of your 584 hand sample size

[bobbywaves]

I'm pretty sure sharpangles already pointed out the idiocy involved in bragging about buying bitcoin at 7k

Stating a fact to prove a couple of asshats "losing bitcoin investment" statement wrong, is not bragging.

Yup, you won 35k off our challenge.

Of course I kicked your ass in our challenge, Waves doesn't lie & steal like you.

[RudyRuetigger]

Not saying the time isn't worth it, sounds entertaining...if I had more time I'd happily take ya on for shits and giggles. Not scared of your 584 hand sample size

don't kid yourself because you aren't fooling me

maybe bobby will fall for you not having the time instead of not having the balls

also would love to hear your opinion on how long 10 buyins take to win at a heads up match

[RudyRuetigger]

jayvegas signed in and accepted the challenge

lets see if he keeps his word, I say no

[Sam Losco]

with all due respect rudy, how can you wager 10k in a poker challege when your 8k in the hole? whos your backer? dont see why anyone would do this on credit

[bobbywaves]

maybe bobby will fall for you not having the time instead of not having the balls

Why would I fall for that lame time excuse, when I already kicked Tripe's ass taking him for 29k?

Clearly a balls issue, nothing to do with time. Tripe will never have the balls to bet me an annual challenge again.

[Triple_D_Bet]

don't kid yourself because you aren't fooling me

maybe bobby will fall for you not having the time instead of not having the balls
















also would love to hear your opinion on how long 10 buyins take to win at a heads up match

Eh? I don't even log on half the time, and I can't remember the last time I had time to even finish a daily tourney. My 'balls' are currently being used to play poker for cash, which is both more entertaining and profitable. I do consider SBR poker fun, just not as entertaining as several other things I prefer to do these days.

Was never a heads up specialist by any stretch of the imagination, but 10k hands for 10 buyins would be on the low end for a serious player vs serious competition. In SBR poker, where the competition is a little less than serious and the stakes are low (not just cash-value-wise, but skin-in-the-game-wise), probably considerably fewer hands. Regardless, we can probably agree that a 584 hand sample size isn't terribly significant? If it is, I've got a $5600 net session from this week I'll enter into the epeen-measuring contest

with all due respect rudy, how can you wager 10k in a poker challege when your 8k in the hole? whos your backer? dont see why anyone would do this on credit

Rudy has backers and is good for it if they say he is...always a fair question around here though; some folks like bobbo don't get called out on being a stiff often, and people might not know until they ask.

...Tripe will never have the balls time to bet me an annual challenge again.

Fixed that for you. It's possible I'd have the time in the future, but almost certainly not the interest to play for chump change and with a known stiff no less. If I did though, the results are pretty predictable; after all, the last year I missed less than 2 months worth of dailies, you played damn near every day trying as hard as you could and I still smoked you.

If you weren't literally in poverty, you could make the stakes interesting enough to warrant my time, in theory. In reality, considering my fellow taxpayers and I are already subsidize your scamming ass, I'm not sure it would make sense to make you even poorer and in need of more handouts from us. You're always welcome to show up in Vegas when the rest of us are there, or at a Bash, to play this game you claim to be so good at (but can suspiciously never be bothered with except for freerolls)

[bobbywaves]

Fixed that for you. It's possible I'd have the time in the future, but almost certainly not the interest to play for chump change and with a known stiff no less. If I did though, the results are pretty predictable; after all, the last year I missed less than 2 months worth of dailies, you played damn near every day trying as hard as you could and I still smoked you.

If you weren't literally in poverty, you could make the stakes interesting enough to warrant my time, in theory. In reality, considering my fellow taxpayers and I are already subsidize your scamming ass, I'm not sure it would make sense to make you even poorer and in need of more handouts from us. You're always welcome to show up in Vegas when the rest of us are there, or at a Bash, to play this game you claim to be so good at (but can suspiciously never be bothered with except for freerolls)

Facts are: I beat you 3 out of the last 4 on annual board. I made annual board the last 4 years, compared to your 2. I also smoked you by 2k the only time it mattered, when we had a 29k wager.

We can wager whatever you want to warrant your time. I usually don't wager with known thieves such as yourself, but since post up with a 3rd party is required it's not an issue.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Facts are: I beat you 3 out of the last 4 on annual board. I made annual board the last 4 years, compared to your 2. I also smoked you by 2k the only time it mattered, when we had a 29k wager.

We can wager whatever you want to warrant your time. I usually don't wager with known thieves such as yourself, but since post up with a 3rd party is required it's not an issue.

The facts are a bit different in context, but it's not like you wanted to acknowledge the indisputable truth the first dozen times it was brought up, so I'll just leave you to your ignorance as usual

As for a wager that warrants my time, let's figure out what it would take. Let's call it 240 dailies a year at an hour each on average, at the $30/hr I can expect to make playing the games I do now, at 2,000 points/$100 cash conversion. That's 144k points...add in 72k more so when I win, I can give DS what you owe him (you'd still be a stiff, but at least he'll get the points he won fair and square). Round that 216k up a bit just so it'll sound better for posterity, and 229k is the minimum I'd consider worth my time. No discount for entertainment value or proving you wrong, as that's already been done over and over again.

Let me know when you get close to scraping that together, then I'll post it up and you can go from losing the biggest bet in SBR history to losing one an even bigger one

[bobbywaves]

The facts are a bit different in context, but it's not like you wanted to acknowledge the indisputable truth the first dozen times it was brought up, so I'll just leave you to your ignorance as usual

As for a wager that warrants my time, let's figure out what it would take. Let's call it 240 dailies a year at an hour each on average, at the $30/hr I can expect to make playing the games I do now, at 2,000 points/$100 cash conversion. That's 144k points...add in 72k more so when I win, I can give DS what you owe him (you'd still be a stiff, but at least he'll get the points he won fair and square). Round that 216k up a bit just so it'll sound better for posterity, and 229k is the minimum I'd consider worth my time. No discount for entertainment value or proving you wrong, as that's already been done over and over again.

Let me know when you get close to scraping that together, then I'll post it up and you can go from losing the biggest bet in SBR history to losing one an even bigger one

Coming from a guy with less than 2k.

Let me me know when u have 229k broke dikk.

[RudyRuetigger]

no one agrees to play


weird


10 buyins is about 10 hours, give or take

given the competition at sbr, and if we reload in 1 setting...itll be done in 5

[RudyRuetigger]

just won a fukkin grand today with $87 at BOL

do not have card catcher there so cant post graph

[Triple_D_Bet]

Coming from a guy with less than 2k.

Let me me know when u have 229k broke dikk.

You think having 221k less than the wager is more impressive than having 227k less? It would take less than a couple weeks for me to get there, but I'm not interested in getting it if you're going to duck out the same way you did with DS time after time.

It'd be easy enough to draft a quick agreement in plain English where upon agreeing, we'd both post up the 229k within a set time frame, and failure to do so would result in automatically losing the bet, with the loser agreeing not to participate in SBR poker, contests, sportsbook or posting until paid up. That's a big disadvantage to me, considering you've already proven you're willing to break your word for far fewer points...but there's a minimal entertainment value in proving you a liar yet again.

You just let me know if that sounds agreeable to you, and I'll draft it up; after agreeing, I'll post up the points with yisman and wait for you to fail to do the same.

just won a fukkin grand today with $87 at BOL

do not have card catcher there so cant post graph

Congrats...all skill?

If by some miracle bobbo doesn't run away from the above, I'll have an hour a day to play with ya and make ya 3-0

[bobbywaves]

You think having 221k less than the wager is more impressive than having 227k less?

Absolutely....Additionally, Waves cashing out 162K compared to your measly 47k is 3.5x more impressive!

It would take less than a couple weeks for me to get there, but I'm not interested in getting it if you're going to duck out the same way you did with DS time after time.

It'd be easy enough to draft a quick agreement in plain English where upon agreeing, we'd both post up the 229k within a set time frame, and failure to do so would result in automatically losing the bet, with the loser agreeing not to participate in SBR poker, contests, sportsbook or posting until paid up. That's a big disadvantage to me, considering you've already proven you're willing to break your word for far fewer points...but there's a minimal entertainment value in proving you a liar yet again.

You just let me know if that sounds agreeable to you, and I'll draft it up; after agreeing, I'll post up the points with yisman and wait for you to fail to do the same.

I'm not like you & DS, who need to do loans/gifts in an ignorant attempt to circumvent bets. I win my bets on pure skill, which I already demonstrated by taking your sorry ass for 29k in our poker bet.

Now get back to me when you have 229k without any outside help from your asshat cronies, broke dikk.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Ah, the bobbo-duck-and-run at its finiest...in about 24 hours, we go from:

...Tripe will never have the balls to bet me an annual challenge again.

to:

...We can wager whatever you want to warrant your time..

to:

...Let me me know when u have 229k broke dikk.

to finally:

...get back to me when you have 229k without any outside help

Common to the standard bobbo-runs-his-mouth-then-makes-excuses routine, more and more restrictions are piled on as he attempts to backpedal his way out of actually having to put points where his mouth is. He didn't mind accepting points sent by my 'cronies' when I borrowed to pay the previous challenge I lost, but we can safely assume the prospect of losing so many points, combined with his awareness that he's not as good as he pretends to be, has him scrambling for any excuse he can find.

Nothing wrong with being afraid bobbo, most would consider it reasonable behavior on your part...just try to realize that once you demonstrate it, you can't really go on pretending you're not afraid. I'll try to remind you if you forget though

Rudy, back to your regularly scheduled thread...well, after one more post from bobbo most likely, probably selectively quoting something and trying to backpedal some more

[bobbywaves]

Ah, the bobbo-duck-and-run at its finiest...in about 24 hours, we go from:



to:



to:






to finally:


Common to the standard bobbo-runs-his-mouth-then-makes-excuses routine, more and more restrictions are piled on as he attempts to backpedal his way out of actually having to put points where his mouth is. He didn't mind accepting points sent by my 'cronies' when I borrowed to pay the previous challenge I lost, but we can safely assume the prospect of losing so many points, combined with his awareness that he's not as good as he pretends to be, has him scrambling for any excuse he can find.

Nothing wrong with being afraid bobbo, most would consider it reasonable behavior on your part...just try to realize that once you demonstrate it, you can't really go on pretending you're not afraid. I'll try to remind you if you forget though

So you propose an unrealistic 229k bet to disguise being a true coward, by not accepting any more annual challenges after I kicked your ass. Apparently you learned your lesson, as I kicked your ass last year as well.

Proposing a 229k bet when you have less than 2k, only further demonstrates your ignorance. Well done chump.

[Triple_D_Bet]

So you propose an unrealistic 229k bet to disguise being a true coward, by not accepting any more annual challenges after I kicked your ass. Apparently you learned your lesson, as I kicked your ass last year as well.

Proposing a 229k bet when you have less than 2k, only further demonstrates your ignorance. Well done chump.

Not unrealistic for me; as I explained above, that's about what it would take for playing hundreds of dailies to be worth my time. If was going to play anyways, I'd let you off the hook for something smaller, along the lines of 10k + the 72k you owe DS....but that's not the case.

I'm fully aware that while that amount is only a portion of my current poker bankroll, it'd probably require you to take out a max mortgage on your house...but unfortunately, it being far more than you can afford doesn't make it any less inconvenient for me. Getting the 229k won't be a problem for me, as evidenced by the fact that I'm willing to post it up with yisman as a condition of action...obviously you can't say the same. Considering you won't even go 10k with DS, I'm sure we're all skeptical you'd take the wager even if you could come up with the funds...but since you can't, I guess it's irrelevant.

I'm sure turning down a challenge like this won't shut you up, but it'll be yet another handy point of reference to remind you of next time you start babbling about challenges

[bobbywaves]

Not unrealistic for me; as I explained above, that's about what it would take for playing hundreds of dailies to be worth my time. If was going to play anyways, I'd let you off the hook for something smaller, along the lines of 10k + the 72k you owe DS....but that's not the case.

I'm fully aware that while that amount is only a portion of my current poker bankroll, it'd probably require you to take out a max mortgage on your house...but unfortunately, it being far more than you can afford doesn't make it any less inconvenient for me. Getting the 229k won't be a problem for me, as evidenced by the fact that I'm willing to post it up with yisman as a condition of action...obviously you can't say the same. Considering you won't even go 10k with DS, I'm sure we're all skeptical you'd take the wager even if you could come up with the funds...but since you can't, I guess it's irrelevant.

I'm sure turning down a challenge like this won't shut you up, but it'll be yet another handy point of reference to remind you of next time you start babbling about challenges

Facts are:

You don't have 229k to offer such an ignorant wager. Offering to post up with Yis, doesn't change this fact.

I already accepted & crushed you in a 29k bet. So I would clearly bet you whatever amount we both have.

You offer an unrealistic 229k bet, in a pathetic attempt to disguise the coward you are. You haven't accepted my annual challenges after I kicked your ass years ago. Makes sense, you finally learned I'm the better player & choose not to lose any more to Waves. Smart decision to stay away after losing 29k, nobody blames you for that. But pretending you're the better player when I soundly kicked your ass in a skill based challenge, only further demonstrates your ignorance.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Facts are:

You don't have 229k to offer such an ignorant wager. Offering to post up with Yis, doesn't change this fact.

I already accepted & crushed you in a 29k bet. So I would clearly bet you whatever amount we both have.

You offer an unrealistic 229k bet, in a pathetic attempt to disguise the coward you are. You haven't accepted my annual challenges after I kicked your ass years ago. Makes sense, you finally learned I'm the better player & choose not to lose any more to Waves. Smart decision to stay away after losing 29k, nobody blames you for that. But pretending you're the better player when I soundly kicked your ass in a skill based challenge, only further demonstrates your ignorance.

I have the ability to get 229k in a timely manner, as evidenced by my willingness to stake my existence on SBR on it. It would be somewhat inconvenient for me to do, which is why you'd have to agree to the bet first and similar intent to get there before I pull the trigger.

You're clearly not willing to bet enough to make it worth my time. There's nothing wrong with not being able to afford it; there were plenty of years when I couldn't have either, and I'm not a ghetto-dwelling failure of the New Jersey special education system. There's also nothing wrong with declining out of concern you'd lose....but it has to be one of the two. Which is it, too scared or too broke?

[bobbywaves]

I have the ability to get 229k in a timely manner, as evidenced by my willingness to stake my existence on SBR on it. It would be somewhat inconvenient for me to do, which is why you'd have to agree to the bet first and similar intent to get there before I pull the trigger.

You're clearly not willing to bet enough to make it worth my time. There's nothing wrong with not being able to afford it; there were plenty of years when I couldn't have either, and I'm not a ghetto-dwelling failure of the New Jersey special education system. There's also nothing wrong with declining out of concern you'd lose....but it has to be one of the two. Which is it, too scared or too broke?

Again, I’m not like you & DS who have to do loans/gifts to circumvent a bet. In my 10 years here, I haven’t solicited any loans. Loans are for broke dikks, who can’t generate their own pts.

I know you don’t reside in NJ, or I would have pummeled you by now. You’re a ghetto-dwelling failure of the California special education system.

Easy to see you offered an unrealistic 229k bet, in a pathetic effort to act tough. In reality you’re a coward who wants nothing to do with another Waves bet, since I soundly kicked your ass. Basically stole 35k from you & others who ignorantly backed you.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Again, I’m not like you & DS who have to do loans/gifts to circumvent a bet. In my 10 years here, I haven’t solicited any loans. Loans are for broke dikks, who can’t generate their own pts.

I know you don’t reside in NJ, or I would have pummeled you by now. You’re a ghetto-dwelling failure of the California special education system.

Easy to see you offered an unrealistic 229k bet, in a pathetic effort to act tough. In reality you’re a coward who wants nothing to do with another Waves bet, since I soundly kicked your ass. Basically stole 35k from you & others who ignorantly backed you.

Your inability to come up with the funds and your inability to understand financial instruments aren't my problem. You said you'd wager whatever I wanted, I told you what I wanted, and you refused...not rocket science to see who the coward is between us

You screwed up your 'nuh-uh, YOU'RE that thing you said!' routine though; I never went to school in CA, and where I live is about the opposite of a ghetto. See, those are appropriate things to say about you because they're true; when you say them about someone else and they're not applicable, there's not really anything amusing or witty about it, you just make yourself look even dumber. Don't expect you to take that in, but maybe you can have someone smarter explain it to you, like a 10 year old

Yet again, 229k isn't unreasonable for me; I buy in for more than that every month...if you can't afford it, that's fine, but rambling about unrelated things doesn't change anything

[bobbywaves]

Your inability to come up with the funds and your inability to understand financial instruments aren't my problem. You said you'd wager whatever I wanted, I told you what I wanted, and you refused...not rocket science to see who the coward is between us

You screwed up your 'nuh-uh, YOU'RE that thing you said!' routine though; I never went to school in CA, and where I live is about the opposite of a ghetto. See, those are appropriate things to say about you because they're true; when you say them about someone else and they're not applicable, there's not really anything amusing or witty about it, you just make yourself look even dumber. Don't expect you to take that in, but maybe you can have someone smarter explain it to you, like a 10 year old

Yet again, 229k isn't unreasonable for me; I buy in for more than that every month...if you can't afford it, that's fine, but rambling about unrelated things doesn't change anything

The 229k you want to bet is unreasonable, as we can't buy pts. If SBR allowed me to buy the pts, it would be a snap call accepting your bet. You're willing to burden several others by soliciting loans to bet with pts you don't have, since I know only 1 guy who has 229k. And highly doubt he would loan it to you, considering I kicked your ass in previous challenge. I'm not willing to participate in such irresponsible loan behavior. Loans are for broke dikks like you, who can't generate their own pts.

You & Rudy are both the same: Two loudmouth, attention whore, windbags, who propose poker bets with pts they don't have. Buried, rest in peace Tripe.

[Triple_D_Bet]

The 229k you want to bet is unreasonable, as we can't buy pts. If SBR allowed me to buy the pts, it would be a snap call accepting your bet. You're willing to burden several others by soliciting loans to bet with pts you don't have, since I know only 1 guy who has 229k. And highly doubt he would loan it to you, considering I kicked your ass in previous challenge. I'm not willing to participate in such irresponsible loan behavior. Loans are for broke dikks like you, who can't generate their own pts.

You & Rudy are both the same: Two loudmouth, attention whore, windbags, who propose poker bets with pts they don't have. Buried, rest in peace Tripe.

You didn't have any objection to where the points came from last time; pretty obvious you're just making excuses at this point, for your lack of funds and/or fear of playing for decent stakes.

Rudy and I certainly have one thing in common: we can win at poker when the stakes aren't insignificant, more than you can claim

[bobbywaves]

You didn't have any objection to where the points came from last time; pretty obvious you're just making excuses at this point, for your lack of funds and/or fear of playing for decent stakes.

Why would I have an objection last time, when our pt balances had the 29k bet covered & my balance was much larger than yours? I actually wanted to bet more than the 29k, that I eventually suckered you into accepting. Your arrogance & irresponsibility kept you from holding onto your pts throughout the year, so you had to solicit 25k in pathetic loans just to pay Waves. Then you paid late, without interest compensation. Because you're a scumbag & it took you time to solicit these loans, despite me having locked up the win on 12/28. You were even ignorant enough to decline my generous early buyout offers, which would have saved you & your lenders pts.

What you're doing now is proposing an ignorant 229k bet, since you know we both don't have it. In your pathetic mind, this makes you feel tough. In reality, it shows the coward you are.

Rudy and I certainly have one thing in common: we can cowardly propose large bets with pts we don't have

[Triple_D_Bet]

Why would I have an objection last time, when our pt balances had the 29k bet covered & my balance was much larger than yours? I actually wanted to bet more than the 29k, that I eventually suckered you into accepting. Your arrogance & irresponsibility kept you from holding onto your pts throughout the year, so you had to solicit 25k in pathetic loans just to pay Waves. Then you paid late, without interest compensation. Because you're a scumbag & it took you time to solicit these loans, despite me having locked up the win on 12/28. You were even ignorant enough to decline my generous early buyout offers, which would have saved you & your lenders pts.

What you're doing now is proposing an ignorant 229k bet, since you know we both don't have it. In your pathetic mind, this makes you feel tough. In reality, it shows the coward you are.

Always amusing hearing your make-believe versions of reality. Of course, the problem with lying to yourself as often as others is that you end up getting it wrong a lot. I didn't have a 29k balance when I proposed to bet more, and you had no issue with where the points would come from. As I said, you're just making excuses, and pretty transparent ones at that

[bobbywaves]

Always amusing hearing your make-believe versions of reality. Of course, the problem with lying to yourself as often as others is that you end up getting it wrong a lot. I didn't have a 29k balance when I proposed to bet more, and you had no issue with where the points would come from. As I said, you're just making excuses, and pretty transparent ones at that

All I state are facts. 97.4% of my stated facts you don't even address, since it's indisputable. The other 2.6%, you try to dispute by twisting the facts.

Here's just a few indisputable facts:

1) I kicked your ass for 29k in our last poker bet.
2) You're now proposing an ignorant 229k poker bet, when you're 227k pts short.
3) You cashed out 115k pts less than Waves.