Rollover started in the summer of 2011 , almost a year after poker started here, Oringinally trny winnings were credited by a mod by hand. No such thing as poker pts or rollover. ( just a little historical info for those who weren't here )
I know there are some real all stars here who hate the idea of flipping to achieve rollover. I respect their opinions.
Here's why I flip. As I've said , I never played hold em anywhere but here. From the beginning the tourneys were fun for me, but the ring games for rollover were not. It was taking a very long time to do rolls at the small stake tables. To me, the ring games and trnys are quite different - requiring different skillls, strategies, and levels of patience. Playing with patience and trying to do rollover - well they just don't go together. It didn't seem logical to have to do rollover in a completely different setting than the one in which the pts were won. As I later discoverd , some top players felt the same way.
About a year after rollover started , I would typically have 40 or more cashes to roll. I remember that when I was introduced to flipping , I had 44 cashes for ~6k in the poker cashier. In fact , I had learned the hard way about the use em or lose em six month rule for rollover. I kept a record on paper of my cashes and rollover results. One day I noticed a 600 pt cash was gone. Luckily, when I contacted the staff, Lou ( this was back when Lou was Lou ) kindly gave me a one time dispensation from that rule and returmed the 600, with a new date and 6 more month to get to it..
In the summer of 2012 a top player here taught me about flipping and I joined what was then a small community of flippers. I was hooked. The number of cashes to be rolled diminished relatively quickly. The number of flippers gradually increased. As I said in another post, I've flipped with about 20 others and I would imagine some of the flippers I knew flipped with others I'm not aware of.
I'm sorry flp haters. Call me scaredy cat or wussy if you will. But it works for me - and apparently many others - some of them among the 'stars' here.
I emphasize that it is not a pts collusion thing. In any session you can easy lose or win many pts at 20 per flip. What made it appealing was the time saving compared to, for me, small stakes ring games - and that's with out the extra benefit described below.
After a awhile, we noticed that in omaha if the big stack shoved first and was called by a smaller stack, the big stack amount was credited toward rollover for that player. We wondered how long it would last. Surely it would be changed. As far as I know nobody ever reported it. It continued.
We had liked shoving situations anyway because A) it was more fun to see each others cards pre flop and B) we didn't have to keep clicking 'check' . So it was hard to not benefit from the "bug". Anyway , all hands were not like this -- sometimes very few. When both stacks were over 20 , it was bet 20 and check.
(see next post )