What you're referring to is points won from tournaments (of which I only have 17k); as you've correctly figured out, this is why I'm not on the leaderboard and not in the running for the
$0 and
0 points to be handed out to members of the prestigous leaderboard. Might be interesting to note that it took me half as many cashes to get there.
What I'm talking about is overall points won in poker...I thought I was being clear enough, but perhaps not. To clarify, that's dailies, weekend tournaments (which I hardly ever play), special tourneys and ring games. In this regard, the difference between you and me is massive; it's about as many points as you've won in tourneys all this year. The winrates I quoted above are accurate, and give you a good idea of how your winrate stacks up to mine. Again, congratulations for hanging on in the dailies for mincashes; call me old fashioned, but I prefer a strategy that gets me more points for my time, and this strategy seems to be working quite a bit better than yours
In the end it's all pretty meaningless trying to judge these things on SBR...it's only concrete if you have data which we don't have available to us. My point is that when there's 0 incentive to being on a leaderboard, you can't make the assumption that it's a terribly accurate guage of skill even for just tourneys. Or rather, you can make that assumption, but you come out looking a little foolish. Offering ridiculously low odds on something where you're an overwhelming favorite even if you don't log in to play, and believing those odds are fair, makes you look downright dense