1. 01-24-11 09:18 PM #1
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Fed Looks Like A Fukkin Machine

    Although so does Nadal

    These guys are playing unreal Tennis

    Murray and DoJo also playing great

    Can Fed beat all these guys again ? It has been going on since early November
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-25-11 01:49 AM #2
    benrama
    benrama's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-19-11
    Posts: 1,499
    Betpoints: 106

    I made a play at my sportsbook for the final to *not* be Federer/Nadal, after I saw how Djokovic, Murry and Soderling were playing. I got +188 odds, but right now - don't like my chances. Nadal and Federer live for slams.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-25-11 01:51 AM #3
    Ace_of_Spades
    Golazo De Riverrrr!
    Ace_of_Spades's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-14-09
    Posts: 13,518
    Betpoints: 79

    They all look like machines. Hard to pick a winner out of the 4.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 01-25-11 01:56 AM #4
    JOHON8
    gambling fallacy
    JOHON8's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-28-10
    Posts: 7,712
    Betpoints: 338

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace_of_Spades View Post
    They all look like machines. Hard to pick a winner out of the 4.
    What I was thinking when I read his statement. When does Federer not look like a machine, that's when you can tell if he isn't winning a tournament.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 01-25-11 02:09 AM #5
    noober
    noober's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-09
    Posts: 2,012
    Betpoints: 5901

    and some stupid people were betting heavy on wawrinka. price went from 1.2 to almost 1.3
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 01-25-11 05:09 AM #6
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Going to be tough final four

    These punks like ranked from 5-20 just cannot even win a fukkin set most of the time on these guys

    They just know they cannot win and play like it

    Shame on them
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 01-25-11 05:58 AM #7
    Daveyboy
    Daveyboy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-12-10
    Posts: 1,317
    Betpoints: 0

    Cant believe Federer was as high as 1.3 before this match. Why?!?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 01-25-11 06:00 AM #8
    kingsr
    kingsr's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-23-10
    Posts: 1,983
    Betpoints: 3061

    Quote Originally Posted by Daveyboy View Post
    Cant believe Federer was as high as 1.3 before this match. Why?!?

    Because people thought Wawrinka had a chance and people jumped at what they called 'value' +300
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 01-25-11 06:14 AM #9
    Ace_of_Spades
    Golazo De Riverrrr!
    Ace_of_Spades's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-14-09
    Posts: 13,518
    Betpoints: 79

    Quote Originally Posted by kingsr View Post
    Because people thought Wawrinka had a chance and people jumped at what they called 'value' +300
    How many times have we seen that word been thrown around and the bet isn't even close.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 01-25-11 07:49 AM #10
    shari91
    shari91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-23-10
    Posts: 32,661
    Betpoints: 1689

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace_of_Spades View Post
    How many times have we seen that word been thrown around and the bet isn't even close.
    Not to offend anyone who uses the word but the only 'value' to be found in tennis betting is when you do your research and then do your calculations. If the price you can get is better than the chance your math suggests should be the price, then you should make the bet. If not, you should pass. Even if the odds are tempting. Sure, bet some big dogs for small amounts if you want action only but betting someone because they had a good run and you can get a good price is still a crappy bet if your work doesn't suggest those odds are worth it.

    As for Fed, he's not looking invincible. Neither us Nadal. But theychave the experience of dealing with guys trying to claim their thrones and that means a lot. With that being said, I think Murray will have a bit of a fight with Dolgo so you never know.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 01-25-11 07:58 AM #11
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Murray is a high level choker, thinks he cannot win big one
    DJO is not as bad

    Nadal right now killing the ball better than anyone, DoJo second followed by Fed
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 01-25-11 08:21 AM #12
    moses millsap
    moses millsap's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-25-05
    Posts: 8,289
    Betpoints: 1260

    dont see him beating rafa at all
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 01-25-11 08:36 AM #13
    bruceBRUCEbruce
    bruceBRUCEbruce's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-09
    Posts: 2,560
    Betpoints: 1959

    I had a small play on wawrinka last night, he was shredded by the best.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 01-25-11 09:00 AM #14
    SRBI
    SRBI's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-20-09
    Posts: 8,393
    Betpoints: 6

    Rafa is a tennis god.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 01-25-11 09:08 AM #15
    Glitch
    Glitch's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-08-09
    Posts: 11,790
    Betpoints: 5224

    Quote Originally Posted by kingsr View Post
    Because people thought Wawrinka had a chance and people jumped at what they called 'value' +300
    thats terrible, i had him at +37500 about a month ago. THATs value.

    i feel like nadals playing the best out of everyone right now- even tho i think fed is the best in the world.

    lotsa quality players still in, wouldnt be surprised if any of those big 4 won it. will be surprised if dolgolopov gets any more wins or take the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »