1. 01-21-11 04:20 PM #71
    Powderguy
    Powderguy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-09
    Posts: 6,939
    Betpoints: 54

    LMAO!! OP is a fuking clown, 20 pts total they lost by in 6 games, possibly the best #6 seed ever
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-21-11 05:08 PM #72
    AmpleGamble
    AmpleGamble's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-04-10
    Posts: 568
    Betpoints: 834

    Steelers all the way to the bank..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-21-11 05:39 PM #73
    SpeedPro
    SpeedPro's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-10
    Posts: 643
    Betpoints: 187

    Packers have had a far better year than Chicago IMO.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 01-21-11 05:45 PM #74
    foutty25
    foutty25's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-10
    Posts: 116
    Betpoints: 24

    if anybody blew my mind it would be the jets, didnt see them makin it this far
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 01-21-11 06:06 PM #75
    Dex17
    Dex17's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-10
    Posts: 230
    Betpoints: 0

    Quote Originally Posted by oiler View Post
    green bay is dreaming if they think they will beat chicago at home..wont happen
    What a baseless statement. The Seahawks and Redskins beat the Bears at their place this season. The Pats were supposed to be unbeatable at home and lost to the Jets. Don't be one of those fools that overvalues the homefield factor.

    "Won't happen"... you say it like it's a fact that it's impossible for the Bears to lose at home and against the hottest team that just beat two teams that are better than the Bears on the road. Idiotic.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 01-21-11 06:36 PM #76
    tbab
    tbab's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-11
    Posts: 42
    Betpoints: 0

    GB has a better offense than Chicago. Far better. Last time I checked I believe whoever scores more points wins the football game, please correct me if I am wrong and the rules have changed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 01-21-11 07:36 PM #77
    alexy
    alexy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-23-10
    Posts: 217
    Betpoints: 1864

    Super bowl will be a very big box of surprises. You will see. Gl to all
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 01-21-11 07:46 PM #78
    raggman
    raggman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-15-10
    Posts: 239
    Betpoints: 1

    go packers beat the bears
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 01-21-11 09:11 PM #79
    meader99
    meader99's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-30-10
    Posts: 4,223
    Betpoints: 5231

    I will put my vote on the 1994 Stan Humphries led San Diego Chargers as the worst Super Bowl team ever.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 01-21-11 10:06 PM #80
    slacker00
    slacker00's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-05
    Posts: 12,262
    Betpoints: 15653

    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    Would help to read what I'm responding to
    I'll repost it, if it'll help you:

    Quote Originally Posted by Lazy-Man View Post
    Look at gb roster and compare it to jets or steelers. Now compare the schedule. Packers in the super bowl is a joke
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    GB pro bowlers: 5 PITT pro bowlers: 3 GB schedule rank: 9 PITT schedule rank: 10 GB vs. top 10 Sagarin teams: 6-3 PITT vs. top 10 Sagarin teams: 3-4 http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nfl10.htm
    So, the man says to look at a roster, but you assess a handful of players, badly at that.

    The man says compare schedule, so you take some bad statistics?

    I'm not even supporting his argument, I'll responding more to you laying a turd and others lapping it up.


    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    And you consider what when determining how good a team is?
    No team can be assessed in a void. It's all about matchups. That's part of what makes things like power rankings phony, especially at this time of the year when all remaining teams are top notch. The list of variables in matchups is long, but the first thing any experienced handicapper will look at is the injury report. There are complete books written about this type of subject and I don't feel like writing an entire book as a response here.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 01-21-11 11:04 PM #81
    tatommack
    cowboys make the playoffs
    tatommack's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-10-08
    Posts: 4,171
    Betpoints: 0

    not really that hard to believe they have looked the best of all the remaning teams
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 01-21-11 11:05 PM #82
    MexicanStallion
    MexicanStallion's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-08-08
    Posts: 20,429
    Betpoints: 11153

    Pittsburgh for me. They win their 7th
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 01-21-11 11:25 PM #83
    Sunde91
    Sunde91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,325
    Betpoints: 255

    Quote Originally Posted by slacker00 View Post
    I'll repost it, if it'll help you:





    So, the man says to look at a roster, but you assess a handful of players, badly at that.

    The man says compare schedule, so you take some bad statistics?

    I'm not even supporting his argument, I'll responding more to you laying a turd and others lapping it up.




    No team can be assessed in a void. It's all about matchups. That's part of what makes things like power rankings phony, especially at this time of the year when all remaining teams are top notch. The list of variables in matchups is long, but the first thing any experienced handicapper will look at is the injury report. There are complete books written about this type of subject and I don't feel like writing an entire book as a response here.
    No, you're responding out of your hatred for GB, or for some reason just decided to create an internet beef when you're 100% in the wrong.

    What is a general measurement of the quality of players on a roster? Something concise? Pro Bowlers would be a reasonable fit here outside of going up and down each roster to compare stats for every player. Did I post Pro Bowlers with the assumption that teams with more Pro Bowlers automatically = better quality players, or did I just post it as a general measurement so I could be brief? Reading comprehension is vital here.

    What is a general measurement of the quality of a schedule? It seems Sagarin rankings would be reasonable for all non-GB haters. Or I could say GB's: CHI 2x, @ Philly2x, @ ATL 2x, @ NYJ, @ NE, NYG > Pitt's: ATL, @ NO, NE, BALT 3x, NYJ

    (notice those are the best quality teams on each schedule, and all just happen to be in the top 10 of the Sagarin rankings, hmm)

    I "laid a turd" by posting pertinent, intuitively viable facts, but the OP's zero substance GB smear thread with claims like "GB would be the worst SB team of all time" gets a pass
    Last edited by Sunde91; 01-21-11 at 11:47 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 01-21-11 11:29 PM #84
    Finalnub
    Finalnub's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-17-10
    Posts: 74
    Betpoints: 0

    OP must be leveling. GB has comparable talent to PITS and they're believing that they can win. Would be surprised to see them not in the SB
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 01-21-11 11:45 PM #85
    hankcream
    hankcream's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-30-10
    Posts: 2,048
    Betpoints: 5458

    Lazy-Man do you own a large estate in Lousiana and have a wife named Deanna?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 01-21-11 11:49 PM #86
    Quake
    Quake's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-27-10
    Posts: 267
    Betpoints: 12

    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    GB pro bowlers: 5
    PITT pro bowlers: 3

    GB schedule rank: 9
    PITT schedule rank: 10

    GB vs. top 10 Sagarin teams: 6-3
    PITT vs. top 10 Sagarin teams: 3-4
    http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nfl10.htm


    Craziest part is that somehow Aaron Rogers isn't one of those pro bowlers... Yeah the past 2 weeks hes taken on NFC probowlers Matty Ice and Vick on the road and we know how that turned out..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 01-22-11 01:58 AM #87
    tbab
    tbab's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-11
    Posts: 42
    Betpoints: 0

    And now its Cutler's turn.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 01-22-11 12:12 PM #88
    slacker00
    slacker00's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-05
    Posts: 12,262
    Betpoints: 15653

    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    No, you're responding out of your hatred for GB, or for some reason just decided to create an internet beef when you're 100% in the wrong.

    What is a general measurement of the quality of players on a roster? Something concise? Pro Bowlers would be a reasonable fit here outside of going up and down each roster to compare stats for every player. Did I post Pro Bowlers with the assumption that teams with more Pro Bowlers automatically = better quality players, or did I just post it as a general measurement so I could be brief? Reading comprehension is vital here.

    What is a general measurement of the quality of a schedule? It seems Sagarin rankings would be reasonable for all non-GB haters. Or I could say GB's: CHI 2x, @ Philly2x, @ ATL 2x, @ NYJ, @ NE, NYG > Pitt's: ATL, @ NO, NE, BALT 3x, NYJ

    (notice those are the best quality teams on each schedule, and all just happen to be in the top 10 of the Sagarin rankings, hmm)

    I "laid a turd" by posting pertinent, intuitively viable facts, but the OP's zero substance GB smear thread with claims like "GB would be the worst SB team of all time" gets a pass
    You are simply repeating what you've already said, ignoring what I've said. There's no communication going on here.

    I never said I hated GB. I never said I was wrong. I never said Pro Bowl or Sagarin ratings were relevant, just the opposite.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 01-22-11 10:36 PM #89
    brumbies
    sail close to the wind
    brumbies's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-21-09
    Posts: 1,314
    Betpoints: 7712

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    LOL That;s why I win almost every year in every sport.
    Is that your son in your avatar? Are you a tout? I remember seeing some of your picks in the service plays section.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 01-22-11 11:33 PM #90
    bradnowell
    bradnowell's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-31-10
    Posts: 493
    Betpoints: 181

    I think rodgers will take a superbowl ring over a trip to the pro bowl
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 01-22-11 11:49 PM #91
    samgurt
    samgurt's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-31-10
    Posts: 2,980
    Betpoints: 90

    as long as the bears dont make it to the super bowl, it will be a good game
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 01-25-11 06:32 PM #92
    JACK MATZ
    JACK MATZ's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-12-09
    Posts: 832
    Betpoints: 2213

    Pitt will win this easy!
    Bet the house!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 01-25-11 09:57 PM #93
    tbab
    tbab's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-11
    Posts: 42
    Betpoints: 0

    Still can't believe this?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 01-25-11 09:59 PM #94
    wookieehumper
    wookieehumper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-09-09
    Posts: 355
    Betpoints: 114

    the line doesn't make sense to me... but i'm not going to question it and just stay away from betting this game
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 01-25-11 10:03 PM #95
    tbab
    tbab's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-11
    Posts: 42
    Betpoints: 0

    The line is what it is because Aaron Rodgers is the best QB in the NFL right now.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  26. 01-25-11 10:51 PM #96
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,533
    Betpoints: 1800

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Handicapable View Post
    Disagree....any of those first 3 Denver teams that got crushed....Elway was the ONLY talent they had! SF beat them 56-10 if my memory is correct?
    The niners were just THAT good.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  27. 01-25-11 11:06 PM #97
    Jeffito11
    Jeffito11's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-02-10
    Posts: 63
    Betpoints: 0

    Dumb post, no reasoning behind it. Lol at the bearbackers!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  28. 01-25-11 11:08 PM #98
    wtt0315
    This is the Broncos Year.
    wtt0315's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-07
    Posts: 8,037
    Betpoints: 1

    i really think the line is right on. i think the packers win by 10
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  29. 01-25-11 11:47 PM #99
    tbab
    tbab's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-11
    Posts: 42
    Betpoints: 0

    The Niners beat Denver 55-10.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  30. 01-25-11 11:59 PM #100
    TT77
    TT77's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-19-09
    Posts: 219
    Betpoints: 0

    packers will win you money
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  31. 01-26-11 12:10 AM #101
    Stevedore
    Stevedore's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-09-10
    Posts: 1,218
    Betpoints: 4435

    Quote Originally Posted by JACK MATZ View Post
    Pitt will win this easy!
    Bet the house!!
    I guess the ass whooping we put on BOTH of the NY teams in your state left you unimpressed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  32. 01-26-11 01:13 AM #102
    raiders32
    raiders32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-17-10
    Posts: 566
    Betpoints: 0

    I think the Steelers win a close game.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  33. 01-27-11 04:40 AM #103
    GunShard
    Invest In Ethereum And Bitcoin
    GunShard's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-05-10
    Posts: 9,983
    Betpoints: 1896

    Aaron Rodgers could be the next Joe Montana.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  34. 01-27-11 05:33 AM #104
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    greenbay.? they barely made it in to the playoffs. they had to win their last two. and lucky for them both at home. the bears were already packed up and ready for round 2 as divison winner when pack beat them in greenbay barely with a comeback win in the 4th quarter. in the last 5 minutes of the regular season.

    streak should stop now. steelers won thier divison in week 14. and clinched homefield in 15th.

    this does not matter.?
    who cares about trendy picks.

    steelers hang tuff and disrupt the pack back to their correct seed. (no excuses) 6th.

    steelers are #2 and that with rothlesberger out for a quarter of the season.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  35. 01-27-11 05:35 AM #105
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    to stand a chance maybe greenbay should lure Farve out of retirement as a backup quarterback or running back, for lateral passes.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
First 1234 Last
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »