Shrink was telling everyone that the Colts were a Billy Walters play. I remember making a post saying that all the sharps in Costa Rica were on the Saints and Walters was too. Shrink dismissed it which I remember thinking 'what is he doing?' Walters admits to manipulating people by giving them the opposite side of what he really wants to bet hoping the line will move and then blasting the other side. It happened again with Duke and Butler where Shrink claimed Duke was a Billy play. It wasn't.
When you "manipulate a line" what you really do is manipulate people. If you ever hear 'this is a Billy Walters play' you should probably run. Because if you bet it, you are likely betting against
Billy Walters (not with him) and that could be at least hazardous to your finances.
He may look like a great guy on 60 Minutes but as he himself said; "Look around the room, if you can't tell who is the mark, then you are the mark."