5Dimes line mistake. Quick

**DrStale** · 03-09-11, 10:28 PM

So much stupid in this thread. Guess what? It doesn't matter if YOU consider it cheating, it matters if the book considers it cheating. Do this once and they'll probably just cancel it, keep doing it and they will boot you. It's that simple.

**DMB40** · 03-10-11, 12:03 AM

if you bet halftime lines for soccer it includes the 1sthalf.... Different than the other sports halftime lines

**MartinBlank** · 03-10-11, 12:05 AM

I still don't understand the idea of drawing mass attention to it....on here.

**xKMACKx** · 03-10-11, 12:47 AM

I took an over in a baseball game overnight at 9 when it was 9.5 everywhere else and they cancelled my bet, needless to say they were pretty cool about it and graded the over 9 after i cleared it up on SBR

**ehp6737** · 03-10-11, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

I still don't understand the idea of drawing mass attention to it....on here.

Agreed. Anyone planning on laying down on the line and getting away with it got shot in the foot with this thread.

**ehp6737** · 03-10-11, 01:03 AM

Originally posted by xKMACKx

I took an over in a baseball game overnight at 9 when it was 9.5 everywhere else and they cancelled my bet, needless to say they were pretty cool about it and graded the over 9 after i cleared it up on SBR

A .5 difference on a baseball total is not a "bad line" by any stretch. Any book cancelling that wager after the game is just straight trying to rob you. That's why they were so "cool" about it when you got sbr involved.

**Sawyer** · 03-10-11, 02:05 AM

Don't bet on mistake/wrong lines. Sportsbook management won't appreciate that..specially 5Dimes

**LostBankroll** · 03-10-11, 02:23 AM

5D doesnt have live in game for soccer only full game 1st and 2nd Hs. And this line was probably right. What if score was say nil nil at half. o2.5 would dictate 3 goals in 45 minuts of play in the 2nd. +239 not a BAD line actualy fair line...

**Hareeba!** · 03-10-11, 02:41 AM

brainfade

**sharpcat** · 03-10-11, 03:13 AM

This thread is the reason why online bookmakers are fair by not accepting bets on pricing errors where Las Vegas accepts them!!!

If a casino made a pricing error it would take several hours for word to spread and players to make their way to that casino allowing the casino fair opportunity to catch the error.

Online some clown runs to a chat forum and informs hundreds of players about the error causing the online book to get flooded with hundreds of bets for max wager amounts within 10 minutes.

Mistakes happen and I do not see any book staying in business for long if every little typing error they make, replacing a "-"with a "+", could cost them $10,000 or more.

**HauntingTheHoly** · 03-10-11, 06:11 AM

Would it be a viable solution for the book to pay you for the correct line? "Dear player, the line was supposed to be -250, not +250, obvious error. We paid you for -250." It's true the book shouldn't pay the bad line, but it's a real crime to give the player nothing but a refund b/c that absolutely means the book gets rewarded (a free shot at you) for posting a bad line.

Also: Not all players who bet the line are guilty of shot taking. Plenty of casual non-degen/obsessed players out there who don't even know much about anything and are just playing for fun.

**Cap dat 4ss** · 03-10-11, 06:43 AM

Originally posted by FourLengthsClear

I did wonder about this with two particular European books. In the case of 5Dimes I am sure that it is a simply a case of poor administration/incompetence.

This and they get to identify the shot takers and keep tabs on them. Come cash out time they may or may not cash out their winnings

They don't need much to say "sorry but we've labeled you as a shot taker or you've had chargebacks" etc.... They will then settle to pay about 25% of what is owed

They're not idiots

**jjgold** · 03-10-11, 06:46 AM

Definitely take shot at books because they will take shots at you

**LUSabres** · 03-10-11, 06:48 AM

Good bet.

**stevenash** · 03-10-11, 07:00 AM

It's been my experience that if you catch a bad line, just tell the book, more times than not they'll throw you a little something your way, like a free 50 dollar bet or something.

Take it, a freebie with a rollover is so much better than trying to be cute and cashing in on an honest mistake you have no chance in hell collecting on.

**Cap dat 4ss** · 03-10-11, 07:03 AM

Originally posted by jjgold

Definitely take shot at books because they will take shots at you

JJ don't be a ratard. Books don't lose. They hold all the power. You take shots at books the play is null and void, unless you lose, then they win. Lose-Lose for the player. Plus you'll get black listed if it keeps happening.

**Vaughany** · 03-10-11, 07:05 AM

Originally posted by BettingGeek

in this motherfu(king world

"Either your a shot taker or you taking shot at"
Bill Walter

Ha was about to put his quote as well "You're either the hustler or being hustled"!

**King_Suckerman** · 03-10-11, 02:05 PM

Originally posted by stevenash

It's been my experience that if you catch a bad line, just tell the book, more times than not they'll throw you a little something your way, like a free 50 dollar bet or something. Take it, a freebie with a rollover is so much better than trying to be cute and cashing in on an honest mistake you have no chance in hell collecting on.

yes this has worked for me a couple of times.

**mr.inpak** · 03-10-11, 02:13 PM

you are in a no win situation if the bet losses you lose your money if the bet wins the money is refunded the smart thing to do is to call them and report it

**TRE1968** · 03-10-11, 04:38 PM

all i know is tony is a dick, i bet euro hoops game that was in the 4th q not knowing it was cuz i was following pinny and thier line was moving like crazy..so i put 30 bux on it not sure what was up..turns out my team was up 20 ans almost lost the cover..you shoulda heard that fuk tony.i asked him what do i need to ck to see if every game has started before i bet it..good thing i had money over there or i would told that fuk a thing or two

**GOIRISH** · 03-10-11, 04:53 PM

The way i look at it is, if a book puts out a bad line, then they are at fault. Why should the player be at fault, was he the one paid to post the lines or adjust them? If it is offered and someone takes it , then the book should have it canceled before 10 mins pass in the 2nd, other wise it should stand. when a game is over the book should not look to see if the bet won or lost and decide what to do, that is theft and bullshit in my opinion.

**TRE1968** · 03-10-11, 05:07 PM

that fuker tony acted like he wanted to police his lines

**DrStale** · 03-10-11, 08:57 PM

Originally posted by GOIRISH

The way i look at it is, if a book puts out a bad line, then they are at fault. Why should the player be at fault, was he the one paid to post the lines or adjust them? If it is offered and someone takes it , then the book should have it canceled before 10 mins pass in the 2nd, other wise it should stand. when a game is over the book should not look to see if the bet won or lost and decide what to do, that is theft and bullshit in my opinion.

Oh that's they way you look at it? Well guess what? It doesn't matter how you look at it. You are playing the game by their rules, they are not playing by yours.

**GOIRISH** · 03-10-11, 09:32 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Oh that's they way you look at it? Well guess what? It doesn't matter how you look at it. You are playing the game by their rules, they are not playing by yours.

wrong, i dont play with offshore books for just so reasons, i play by my rules. its bullshit for a book to wait until the end of a game to rule a bet void, but if it were to lose they would still want the money even if it was a bad line.No freakin way am i gonna get swindled like that. If my local gave me a bad line he would own up to it, because its his job not mine to give me the correct info.