1. #71
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    OK, movin. Putting you down for Chi Bears. Thx for posting:

    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Raiders -2 (2x. I'm counting USC's post as backing Raiders)
    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2

  2. #72
    MiDNiTe
    MiDNiTe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-11-13
    Posts: 7,088
    Betpoints: 1164

    Really like jags +6.5, excellent defence and TLaw starting to look good under a decent coach, should be a good match against a firing eagles tram

  3. #73
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by MiDNiTe View Post
    Really like jags +6.5, excellent defence and TLaw starting to look good under a decent coach, should be a good match against a firing eagles tram
    Thanks, midnite. Marking you down as a 2nd guy on Jags. Good Luck!

    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Raiders -2 (2x. I'm counting USC's post as backing Raiders)
    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5 (2x)
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2

  4. #74
    peacebyinches
    pull the trigger
    peacebyinches's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-13-10
    Posts: 1,105
    Betpoints: 3981

    Buffalo at Baltimore UNDER 51

    If this was played in a dome or in good conditions sign me up for a shootout but I can't believe this game's total is still so high (highest projected total this week I believe). According to rotowire:

    "Steady rain will likely lead to poor field conditions for Sunday afternoon’s game at M&T Bank Stadium. Strong, gusty winds blowing from sideline to sideline will also make passing and kicking difficult."

    This total is one of those "am I missing something?" type of lines but I see an increased workload for Buffalo's running backs and maybe **caution: hot take that I'll likely regret incoming...** Justin Tucker struggling or not even getting the opportunity to try longer FGs given the conditions. Are both secondaries banged up beyond all recognition (aka BUBAR, aka term I just made up)? Are both offenses way better than both defenses? Am I galaxy braining this pick in a desperate attempt to find a solid edge this week? Yes, yes and probably, but I see a much quicker game with the clock being chewed up by a very run heavy Ravens team and a Bills team that might still be suffering from heat stroke after that surprisingly hot game in Miami last week.

    If this pick goes wrong it'll be the secondaries giving up stupidly big plays, maybe even because of the wet and windy conditions... but sign me up for the UNDER on an otherwise high total in weather conditions not conducive for long passes or FGs.

  5. #75
    Easy-Rider 66
    Racetrack Television Network
    Easy-Rider 66's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-14-12
    Posts: 31,039
    Betpoints: 5616

    thx for the info Peace will change some things based on your info

  6. #76
    MiDNiTe
    MiDNiTe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-11-13
    Posts: 7,088
    Betpoints: 1164

    Quote Originally Posted by ChuckyTheGoat View Post
    Thanks, midnite. Marking you down as a 2nd guy on Jags. Good Luck!

    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Raiders -2 (2x. I'm counting USC's post as backing Raiders)
    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5 (2x)
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2
    Thanks chucky, gl to all your bets too, taking Arizona +1.5 and raiders -2.5

  7. #77
    MiDNiTe
    MiDNiTe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-11-13
    Posts: 7,088
    Betpoints: 1164

    Yeah nice info peace, hate betting totals but now will be interested in checking the scores of that gane

  8. #78
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Very good info, Peace. Looks like weather could impact the game:

    https://www.wgrz.com/article/weather...3-e22d602194f5

    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Raiders -2 (2x. I'm counting USC's post as backing Raiders)
    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47

    Buff/Balt UND 51
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5 (2x)
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2

  9. #79
    klemopixx
    Shit just got real.
    klemopixx's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-02-14
    Posts: 3,504
    Betpoints: 4329

    Commanders +3.5 at Dallas

    I expected this line to be bigger but you can never tell what happens in an NFC East division game.
    I have to think Rivera knows Wentz is a sitting duck back there for that Dallas pass rush. If he runs the ball and throws enough screens and jet sweeps they could counter that rush. Washington defense is good enough to make this a game. Something just isn't right here.

  10. #80
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 91,348
    Betpoints: 3251

    Quote Originally Posted by klemopixx View Post
    Commanders +3.5 at Dallas

    I expected this line to be bigger but you can never tell what happens in an NFC East division game.
    I have to think Rivera knows Wentz is a sitting duck back there for that Dallas pass rush. If he runs the ball and throws enough screens and jet sweeps they could counter that rush. Washington defense is good enough to make this a game. Something just isn't right here.
    Why would the line be bigger? Dallas qb is garbage.

  11. #81
    Easy-Rider 66
    Racetrack Television Network
    Easy-Rider 66's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-14-12
    Posts: 31,039
    Betpoints: 5616

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    Why would the line be bigger? Dallas qb is garbage.
    so is Wentz?

  12. #82
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 91,348
    Betpoints: 3251

    Quote Originally Posted by Easy-Rider 66 View Post
    so is Wentz?
    Yes but the line is fine. Dallas can't do anything without dak.

  13. #83
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by klemopixx View Post
    Commanders +3.5 at Dallas

    I expected this line to be bigger but you can never tell what happens in an NFC East division game.
    I have to think Rivera knows Wentz is a sitting duck back there for that Dallas pass rush. If he runs the ball and throws enough screens and jet sweeps they could counter that rush. Washington defense is good enough to make this a game. Something just isn't right here.
    Thank you, Klemo, GL. Agree that the pts have a good chance to play here.

    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Raiders -2 (2x. I'm counting USC's post as backing Raiders)
    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47

    Buff/Balt UND 51
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5 (2x)

    Wash +3.5
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2

  14. #84
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    Yes but the line is fine. Dallas can't do anything without dak.
    Laker, got a question for you:

    *Does return of QB ZWilson matter at all for the Jets?

    Line reaction was almost lateral for Flacco to ZWilson. At Flacco's age, not sure that's accurate.

  15. #85
    kaliboyz
    Update your status
    kaliboyz's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-30-09
    Posts: 3,023
    Betpoints: 335

    Carolina Panthers PK for me today.

  16. #86
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by kaliboyz View Post
    Carolina Panthers PK for me today.
    Thank you, Kali, GL. Should be a fun day of games.
    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47
    Buff/Balt UND 51


    Raiders -2 (2x)
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5 (2x)
    CAROL (pk)
    Wash +3.5
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2
    Points Awarded:

    kaliboyz gave ChuckyTheGoat 50 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  17. #87
    TheLock
    TheLock's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-06-08
    Posts: 14,419
    Betpoints: 6986

    Raiders -2.5 -110
    Points Awarded:

    consom888 gave TheLock 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  18. #88
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 91,348
    Betpoints: 3251

    Quote Originally Posted by ChuckyTheGoat View Post
    Laker, got a question for you:

    *Does return of QB ZWilson matter at all for the Jets?

    Line reaction was almost lateral for Flacco to ZWilson. At Flacco's age, not sure that's accurate.
    No it won't matter because they both stink

  19. #89
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLock View Post
    Raiders -2.5 -110
    Thx, Lock. Hope we get there:

    (Thur) Miami +4: ATS loss

    Clev/Atl: UND 48...with UNd 47
    Buff/Balt UND 51


    Raiders -2 (2x)...with -2.5
    Hou +6...with Hou +5.5
    Jax +6.5 (2x)
    CAROL (pk)
    Wash +3.5
    Chi+3
    Jets +3.5
    Ten +3...with +3.5
    San Fran -2

  20. #90
    Tomatero
    Tomatero's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-06-17
    Posts: 336
    Betpoints: 1875

    Quote Originally Posted by Tomatero View Post
    NYJets +3.5, i dont be suprise if jets win SU
    Jets SU ✅

  21. #91
    pologq
    Make SBR Betpoints Matter Again
    pologq's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-07-12
    Posts: 17,892
    Betpoints: 2707

    Quote Originally Posted by pologq View Post
    and with this i am leaning falcons to pull out a win at home
    i am still surprised falcons pulled this off

  22. #92
    pologq
    Make SBR Betpoints Matter Again
    pologq's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-07-12
    Posts: 17,892
    Betpoints: 2707

    Quote Originally Posted by pologq View Post
    titans +3. i got no faith in the colts. colts should have lost that game last week and still look crappy to me. the chiefs lost that game more than the colts won.
    colts really blow

    taylor is nothing like last year

  23. #93
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Mixed bag on the early games:

    *The total plays sweep. Very nice info.

    *Props to Polo and edawg. Each guy wins their play. Makes each 4-0 ATS, one winner each wk. Awesome!

  24. #94
    pologq
    Make SBR Betpoints Matter Again
    pologq's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-07-12
    Posts: 17,892
    Betpoints: 2707

    there is value now cause the books are still treating teams with preseason hype. once it adjusts it will be tougher.

  25. #95
    peacebyinches
    pull the trigger
    peacebyinches's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-13-10
    Posts: 1,105
    Betpoints: 3981

    Was a little worried about that Baltimore/Buffalo under after that quick start but the weather really factored in during the second half. Glad we hit that one.

  26. #96
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by peacebyinches View Post
    Was a little worried about that Baltimore/Buffalo under after that quick start but the weather really factored in during the second half. Glad we hit that one.
    Yes, very good info in your post. Nice winner.

  27. #97
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Raiders get there, win by 9. Props to The Lock...who has won 6 straight (I believe).

  28. #98
    jackpot269
    You are blind to the truth
    jackpot269's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-24-07
    Posts: 9,322
    Betpoints: 6837

    Chucky this could be the thread of the year!!!! YOU ARE THE MAN!! Well maybe a little premature but WHAT A GREAT START!!!

  29. #99
    TheMoneyShot
    TheMoneyShot's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 27,703
    Betpoints: 81

    I definitely like Chucky's thread... the only thing I question... when we say Contrarian... how do we truly know what the force of the public is was on?

    For example... Denver VS Las Vegas... I believe the line opened at Las Vegas -2. At game time it was -2.5 and some shops offered -3 +100 This was a MUST WIN game for Las Vegas early in the year. To say everyone was on Denver... I'd say you're full of sh##.

    I would say this is a rare case in which the Contrarian Angle wouldn't work.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 12/01/2022

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 11/28/2022


  30. #100
    USCPHILLYGUY
    HORSES MODERATOR
    USCPHILLYGUY's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-15-12
    Posts: 21,049
    Betpoints: 16727

    Chucky Iím already starting the week 5 thread!

    Arizona +5.5

  31. #101
    TheMoneyShot
    TheMoneyShot's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 27,703
    Betpoints: 81

    I tend to take Dogs a lot... but the games that stood out to me... from vibes alone...

    Philadelphia -6.5
    N.Y. Giants -3
    Dallas -3
    Las Vegas -2.5

    Glad I stayed away... those games were just too tough to call from an underdog point of view. Philadelphia is one strong MF'ing team. Jacksonville is young/talented... but not proven in all stages of a game. Chicago played like crap on the road. Giants showed up after that sh## performance against Dallas a week ago. Las Vegas... Must Win Situation. And Washington is just pure sh## with Carson Wentz. I don't think the team believes in him at all.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 12/01/2022

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 11/28/2022


  32. #102
    MiDNiTe
    MiDNiTe's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-11-13
    Posts: 7,088
    Betpoints: 1164

    Quote Originally Posted by MiDNiTe View Post
    Thanks chucky, gl to all your bets too, taking Arizona +1.5 and raiders -2.5
    Zona, raiders and buffalo saved me from bad bet on jags, wtf TLaw with his awful turnovers

  33. #103
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by jackpot269 View Post
    Chucky this could be the thread of the year!!!! YOU ARE THE MAN!! Well maybe a little premature but WHAT A GREAT START!!!

    Thank you, Jack! Trying, my man.

    Maybe premature. Nowadays, I'm just happy to get there at all.

  34. #104
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by USCPHILLYGUY View Post
    Chucky Iím already starting the week 5 thread!

    Arizona +5.5
    Good start, USC!

  35. #105
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 24,208
    Betpoints: 12969

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot View Post
    I definitely like Chucky's thread... the only thing I question... when we say Contrarian... how do we truly know what the force of the public is was on?

    For example... Denver VS Las Vegas... I believe the line opened at Las Vegas -2. At game time it was -2.5 and some shops offered -3 +100 This was a MUST WIN game for Las Vegas early in the year. To say everyone was on Denver... I'd say you're full of sh##.

    I would say this is a rare case in which the Contrarian Angle wouldn't work.
    It's a good question, Shot. I'd say a lot of the modern lines do a good job of generating two-way action.

    Title of the thread might be a misnomer. It's all about the Dead Presidents. In my experience, the most obvious NFL play is a side that is going to have a tough time cashing.

    You are right about these NFL lines. I saw a guy say that Miami was a public dog at CINN. Really? Looked like everyone was on CINN to me. Guess he's talking about a Sharp/Square split.

    Sorry for rambling. Yes, wish I had a better way to precisely measure Public Sentiment. You used to see some of that on Office Pool stats.

First 1234 Last
Top