[jjgold]

Interesting as of right now

[johnnyvegas13]

Still early tho

if this even true first place

[jjgold]

Very true

Every bookmaker Vegas says they need rams

Tons ml bets Cincy

[Renegades]

Taking the dog on the ml in these games has become trendy

The better team doesnt always win. NYG were much inferior twice and won

[RangeFinder]

Ram money starting to come in, M took a large wager on the Rams -4.

[Wrongside]

Bengals are a true public dog. Scary stuff. Although, public dogs seem to have a better chance in SB than other big games…

[jjgold]

Bengals got every break
Last 3 games

When does luck run out ?

[johnnyvegas13]

Bengals got every break
Last 3 games

When does luck run out ?

Beating chiefs not that lucky they had a awful d

maybe the huge comeback was lucky

[lakerboy]

Bengals got every break
Last 3 games

When does luck run out ?

Rams didn't get any luck?

[johnnyvegas13]

Rams didn't get any luck?

Really just niner gm

abd niners one tough team I will admit

[Bcatswin]

Luck beating 1 and 2 seeds? And chiefs 2 weeks before playoffs?

[WireWire]

Bengals got every break
Last 3 games

When does luck run out ?

So holding Mahomes to a QB rating of 12.3 in the second half was luck?

[johnnyvegas13]

Luck beating 1 and 2 seeds? And chiefs 2 weeks before playoffs?

Again the chiefs not very good

they got hot 2h season but not a good d

[johnnyvegas13]

So holding Mahomes to a QB rating of 12.3 in the second half was luck?

Again

chiefs...

[WireWire]

Chiefs what???

[kursonik]

My impression is that the entire playoffs have been played by the Rams below their potential, and the Bengals above. That's why people go with Bengals and the books have an imbalance towards the Bengals. I think Superbowl this year will finally reflect the potential of the teams, this time against the trend ... ;-)

[big joe 1212]

Will books get hurt if the number lands on 4?

[OldBill]

fugggggggggggg all the BOOKS they always say they need this team or that team and BTW guys Vegas books got hammered for a long streak in NFL season because we have information just mouse click away

BEST way to Beat the BOOKs is Learning from your losses thier are two types of teams those who play to win and those who play NOT to LOSE

Thier is always a reason why you lost go back n find it make notes so you dont make same mistake next time

[MartingaleMikey]

Yea let’s just ignore how lucky the Rams were to play the the injured Bucs without AB and then have a 49ers DB drop a gift from Stafford that may have ended the game. Bengals were lucky but let’s not act like the Rams weren’t. Still think the Rams are much better though seeing as how they have a loaded roster.

[Bcatswin]

We shall see. Bring it.

[Eddy Munny]

Rams didn't get any luck?

Not really, nothing out of the ordinary.

The Bengals are a team on a true Cinderella run, they've required a lot of breaks to get to this point, expecting the breaks to continue unabated is somewhat foolhardy.

The Rams dominated the Cards. They dominated the Bucs but lost their edge with a large lead and that complacency, combined with a rash of 2H turnovers, allowed the Bucs a miraculous tie late in the game. The 49ers did nothing against the Rams offensively and the Rams played a very sloppy half of football in the first 30 minutes. Shanny has LA's number but the right team won that game.

[johnnyvegas13]

My impression is that the entire playoffs have been played by the Rams below their potential, and the Bengals above. That's why people go with Bengals and the books have an imbalance towards the Bengals. I think Superbowl this year will finally reflect the potential of the teams, this time against the trend ... ;-)

Pretty well said here

i don’t think below potential

but 3 gms in 13 days was hard

two week reset favors rams

[ThaTopMoron]

Rams are winning

how obvious do they got to make it for you?

[ThaTopMoron]

Not really, nothing out of the ordinary.

The Bengals are a team on a true Cinderella run, they've required a lot of breaks to get to this point, expecting the breaks to continue unabated is somewhat foolhardy.

The Rams dominated the Cards. They dominated the Bucs but lost their edge with a large lead and that complacency, combined with a rash of 2H turnovers, allowed the Bucs a miraculous tie late in the game. The 49ers did nothing against the Rams offensively and the Rams played a very sloppy half of football in the first 30 minutes. Shanny has LA's number but the right team won that game.

2 of those Tampa TD's were miraculous 30 yard drives vs a defense that finally started to wilt after being put back on the field over and over again on a short week... they would strip sack Brady and ... boom the ball gets snapped over Stafford's head like yeah OK. 4th down stop turnover on downs... oh no... let me fumble and give it back you to and give brady yet another shot. Rams defense closed out that game twice and the offense should've closed it out with a FG to go up 17 with less than half a quarter left but the FG was short? lol

offense still closed it out with those 2 passes to Cupp. The Bucs acting was so bad on those plays. first play dude "falls down" when Cupp stops and runs for a deep out route... suspiciously fake looking fall. then next play they blitz the guy on Cupp and the safety didn't start back peddling with Cupp running at him full speed till they were almost even with each other that's why he was wide open deep.

whole 4th quarter felt like piss poor acting from the teams.

[Jowframs]

Bungles everywhere
Go Rams!

[Covering the #]

Books are going to take a loss no matter what happens. Plenty of Rams futures offset by Bengals hedges is very common. Only way books make money is very low scoring game and all the under prop bets neutralize the public.

[AribaAriba]

Drake got 1.25 miion riding the rams.. i think action is pretty even in terms of this big primetime game. Books always win with the juice.

[mtofell]

Game is a coin toss.... value is on CIN ml for sure. Gun to my head to pick a winner? Sure, give me the Rams. +165 with CIN ,-195 Rams? I'm on CIN.

[clockwise1965]

Bengals ml.

[jjgold]

Money pouring in 75.% ML bengals

[kursonik]

Money pouring in 75.% ML bengals

Good sign for ... Rams

[garygroundwork]

Books are going to take a loss no matter what happens. Plenty of Rams futures offset by Bengals hedges is very common. Only way books make money is very low scoring game and all the under prop bets neutralize the public.

what about futures on kc, Tampa, greenbay, cows, bills etc

think the books r doing fine

[Alfie White]

no, books need rams or they go down insta

jjgold methodology, years of experience

[ByeShea]

Rams didn't get any luck?

I still haven't made peace with whatever the fuk DC Bowles was thinking at the end of Rams/Buccs.

"Cooper Kupp - run in a straight line to catch a pop fly? I'd like to see him try ..."

[ByeShea]

Good sign for ... Rams

Big time. It all feels so familiar. Especially when my head and heart is all in on the Bengals. I never get this game right.