 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Cincinnati defense isn’t all that bad guys
If they get pressure on Stafford the guy will make a mistake
If they can shut down Kupp they will be fine, not worried about OBJ here, guy will choke
Donald will have his way tonight I’m not doubting that
But IMO Cincinnati’s wide receivers create serious mis-match potential , Ramsey probably won’t play Chase in one on one situations either
No bet on the game as of now, probably will just play some stupid props and hope to hit a box
Good luck all
LA defense fits very well to Bengals offense.
The weakest link in this plan is Troy Reeder in the middle of the field, but his mistakes will cost relatively little.
Stafford will do enough to gain and keep the advantage.
Well, all US books have moved their lines to -4.5 in consensus. What the hell does that mean? They want more Bengals money? I thought the majority of the public is on the Bengals but the sharps are mostly on the Rams. Can this SB be the one where the Sharps lose and the Public wins?Originally Posted by DJK
Meanwhile, I just saw this on TV and now I'm concerned about taking the Bengals.
"Matthew Stafford was on fire hitting all his targets at the practice last week."
Damn these TV people on ESPN are taking mostly the Bengals, which can only draw more public to the Bengals.
4 to 2 on the Bengals including Teddy.
Last edited by DJK; 02-13-22 at 01:06 PM.
Teddy Covers? Huge square. Sharp as a bowling ball.
Please explain. How so?
Donald gets extra blocking often. Doesn't that mean he's effective?
Forget him
still on tilt from niners losing
Johnny, this game is all about Handling the Pressure.
After the top-seeds went out, the Rams are really the only team standing. Rams have a roster that was built to win.
Bengals are a young team. Years ahead of the curve. Rams' game to lose.
If the Rams DO struggle...it's very likely b/c of Stafford. Game is on him.
Teddy Covers. How does this guy pay his bills? Guy never seems to go away:
I agree but rams d so stout this gm Stafford won’t need to do that much
Football is a game of What Ifs. Where would Rams be if Tartt caught this ez INT?
both defenses allow 21 points/game. i think it comes down to the 2-week layoff and which team starts off most negatively effected by that, special teams, stafford, and which coaching staffs can make the better adjustments
Bengals also have the superior kicker, that could play a major role
49ers most probably would have won.
A 75 year old grandmother could have caught that INT. Easily too.
Let me ask you this-has anyone, by anyone I mean anyone...
Heard a single negative word...
About Joe Burrow.
Anywhere.
Of course
He holds the ball too long and that's why he gets so many sacks. With LA then he will have even less time ...
This super bowl made me the most money on any game. The prop bets is the way to make profit.
So I guess most books are in trouble now since the public had Bengals +3.5 to +4.5.
Any reports jj?
This is all just the set up for Tom Brady’s return… the NFL and Brady didn’t want burrow with a ring… it’s scripted for Brady to come back
no thx fuk him and his lame ass gifted rings.
that game last year flag fest first half was puke city they wasn't gonna allow mahomes any shot to stop brady winning 1 with tampa with it being in tampa... joke
i've been on to the script last 4 SB... but got busted this year because the line was over 2.5
4 years in a row SB has gone under
under now leads all time 28-27
No, Teddy Bruschi.
Also, Teddy Covers had the game rated as Rams -1.5 in one of the YouTube videos, so based on that he was on the Bengals as far as I know.
Because there is a sucker born every minute
Books ended up winning
Cincy ML lost
Why would you not take +4 or +4.5 when the Rams/Bengals have both been playing tight games most of the year including playoffs? Idk? The final numbers will be interesting. Rams ML covered. Bengals + points covered. Everybody was on Kupp to get a TD. Smart bettors noticed Cincy starts slow and bet Rams 1Q. Total sacks Over 5.5 +105 cashed easily too. Kicking myself for not pounding that one.
Public always hits Over, but all the sharp money I saw was on the Under. The end results there will be interesting too
and again the Rams 100% perfect LOSE $ 0-4-1
i had two tickets $10 exact scores but only Bengals 31-28 and 26-23
payoff was huge $3010.00
pay off some debts then go frteaking nuts gambling in casino
Reply With Quote
