Lol
OK
lol
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
11-28-20 11:32 PM #1
-
11-28-20 11:33 PM #2
Love the post fight interview.
-
11-28-20 11:33 PM #3
-
11-28-20 11:35 PM #4
Tyson was -3350 on draft kings after round 6 to a draw Oh boy. Vegas didn't get enough Jones money
-
11-28-20 11:36 PM #5
Originally Posted by jjgold
-
11-28-20 11:39 PM #6
You guys betting on grumpy old men when UFC is on and dogs are CRUSHING
-
11-28-20 11:39 PM #7
This result was decided ahead of time.
-
11-28-20 11:40 PM #8
Main event next!!! Originally Posted by gauchojake
-
11-28-20 11:42 PM #9
Vegas was taking money on this fight? Originally Posted by biggie12
-
11-28-20 11:44 PM #10
Tyson be like "We humanitarians now"
Biggie knows.
-
11-28-20 11:56 PM #11
Originally Posted by gauchojake
Well that was pretty fukkin quick. Originally Posted by KVB
Main event next!!!
-
11-28-20 11:58 PM #12
Yeah good times. Smith is a beast
-
11-28-20 11:58 PM #13
Draw was +800 pre fight at Draft Kings.
-
11-29-20 12:02 AM #14
I wonder what the hold on tyson by ko tko was at dk I saw it around -105 Originally Posted by raiders72001
-
11-29-20 12:12 AM #15
no official winner correct? it was always going to be a draw it was a ploy just like that golf match
-
11-29-20 12:45 AM #16
I believe draftkings was the only US book with this fight. They sponsored the fight, and they voided everyones bets. On twitter people are posting voided draw bets. This was a total scam to get peoples money into their book.
-
11-29-20 12:55 AM #17
I can't wait to pay for the rematch...
-
11-29-20 01:14 AM #18
How could they void draw bets??? Are you serious? That's Fd up. Originally Posted by GOIRISH
-
11-29-20 01:45 AM #19
That's a ballsy move! Originally Posted by GOIRISH
What was he official explanation?
-
11-29-20 02:34 AM #20
My bets have been voided too. I had over 6,5 rounds and a draw, both tickets voided. explanation was that there was no referees at the match and the points were not counted, and it was a technical draw. Although I have placed the bets not at draftkings.
-
11-29-20 02:55 AM #21
It was well known how it would be scored all along. Originally Posted by willkur23
-
11-29-20 03:09 AM #22
Is there some official provider of the information? like the scores of judges etc? they claim there was no points counted at all. So maybe if I show them some official results they will pay.
-
11-29-20 03:33 AM #23
This is what the sanctioning body said days before the fight Originally Posted by willkur23
“Let’s call it an exhibition. That’s what it is. I want the public to know what this is because I don’t want people to be disappointed. As long as they know this is an exhibition, I’m fine for everybody to earn. … There’s no official judges. The WBC is going to have some guest celebrity judges remotely, not official, not 10-9 [scores], nothing like that.
“No cumulative score. No winner announced. That’s a very entertainment centered thing. It’s about entertainment. It’s not about competition. … It is what it is and it’s not more than it is but it’s going to be fun,” Andy Foster of the CSAC had said in a statement.
-
11-29-20 03:38 AM #24
If I read and understand this correctly (English is not my native language) than bookmaker is correct. Although I wish they were not
However, this not explains why the over 6,5 was voided.
-
11-29-20 03:44 AM #25
They may be "right" about what they said about scoring. But they should have known that was how it was being done before offering the bets. It's not a good excuse to use afterward. Originally Posted by willkur23
If I read and understand this correctly (English is not my native language) than bookmaker is correct. Although I wish they were not However, this not explains why the over 6,5 was voided.
Especially for Over 6.5 bets like yours.
The scoring method has no bearing on that.
-
11-29-20 04:07 AM #26
Betradar provides all the odds and results for that bookmaker. I guess I should email them.
-
11-29-20 06:29 AM #27
that fight was comical. i feel bad whomever wasted money on that.
-
11-29-20 06:35 AM #28
Officials should be put in jail
lol look who they were..Vinnie Paz a compulsive gambler and drunk that lost all his boxing earnings and two other losers
-
11-29-20 06:38 AM #29
I know Vinny, he's not a loser, JJ. Originally Posted by jjgold
-
11-29-20 06:42 AM #30
YOu guys still talking about this? LOL
-
11-29-20 02:18 PM #31
Does Uncle B still owe you 3 dimes? Originally Posted by raiders72001
-
11-29-20 04:00 PM #32
Oh wow. Originally Posted by GOIRISH
Something not right there. I wonder how many new deposits they got for the fight.
I hope they allow immediate withdrawals of those funds, with no conditions.
Terrible look here.
-
11-29-20 05:37 PM #33
From what I read it's due to the over 90% of bets on Tyson that they decide to void it. Originally Posted by KVB
Which does sound a little bit better than voiding to avoid paying Draw bets.
But a dogs breakfast still.
I'm surprised any gambling regulator approved of them offering odds on it to start with, in hindsight.
-
11-29-20 06:25 PM #34
That’s terrible the thing was rigged
-
11-29-20 06:25 PM #35
Yeah, it was widely publicized as a sparring event and with the judges not even in house it's a little weird. Originally Posted by Optional
I can see why they wanted to offer odds, they were showing the odds during the broadcast and it was sponsored by the book. There must have been tons of interest.
The Legends Only League will have future events, it will be interesting how they handle those betting wise.
Reply With Quote
