On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal of the case, adopting a different view that the case was akin to the U.S. Supreme Court's 1984 decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents, which held that the NCAA had violated antitrust laws by restricting the output of its broadcast games.The plaintiffs are arguing the Sunday Ticket package is exclusive, the report goes on to state. Residential consumers pay more than $250 per year, while rates for commercial businesses, like restaurants and sports bars, range from $2,314 to $120,000 a year.The argument is the rates are excessive, Law.com continues. The consolidated class action alleges the arrangement restricts competition in violation of the federal Sherman Antitrust Act.The overriding alleged issue is the antitrust problem with the Sunday Ticket-and, more broadly, with the NFL combining the broadcasting of games into bundled deals with NBC, CBS, Fox and ESPN-is that it precludes individual NFL teams from competing with one another in the broadcasting of games to out-of-town markets, SI.com added in a legal examination of the case.The arguments on sides are deep and steep and this could have a big impact on the way fans are able to watch NFL games if the plaintiffs win their case.