[lakerboy]

This is garbage.

[shadymcgrady]

Tell me about it, I had the first half under

[thomorino]

yeah agree, what the fuk is VAR for. They are only suppose to be overturning calls that are clear and obvious, she was at most offside by a half an inch, that's not clear and obvious.

[packerd_00]

To hell with Cameroon, spitting on the English players. Vile. If you lost money im not trying to rub it in,I just dont feel bad for them.

[funnyb25]

I rarely even watch soccer on TV anymore. VAR has completely ruined the game and has been used incorrectly ever since introduced. It was introduced to fix clear and obvious error, and instead it is just completely re-officiating the game.

They need to get rid of it. Unless of course, it gives the fix what they need.

[2daBank]

I rarely even watch soccer on TV anymore. VAR has completely ruined the game and has been used incorrectly ever since introduced. It was introduced to fix clear and obvious error, and instead it is just completely re-officiating the game.

They need to get rid of it. Unless of course, it gives the fix what they need.

I feel same way about replay in mlb. Seemed like a good idea to fix obvious errors but instead they have used it to change the spirit of rules, annoys me. All the while we still have to deal w some blind jerkoff missing obvious ball/strike calls we all see on the box at home. They should put a 17 year old w a iPad back there and pay him minimum wage!! lol

[jtoler]

quite a few matches have been ruined this world cup by bs

[daneblazer]

They’re probably used to it

[packerd_00]

I rarely even watch soccer on TV anymore. VAR has completely ruined the game and has been used incorrectly ever since introduced. It was introduced to fix clear and obvious error, and instead it is just completely re-officiating the game.

They need to get rid of it. Unless of course, it gives the fix what they need.

This is why it was introduced,you remember this.

[pavyracer]

Mark my words. In 5 years VAR would be history. It creates more controversy than solved. Both England's goals first half were bogus. First one the back pass was not intentional. It happens all the time in men leagues and they never call it. It has to be an intentional pass to the goalie to avoid moving the ball forward.

The second goal it was a judgement call on the offside. But then given the fact that the first goal was a ref error it shouldn't have counted. In football and baseball the refs and umpires make up calls all the time when a questionable call for a holding was given earlier or a ball was called a strike and vice versa.

Now the Cameroon goal was also a judgement call but since they were already fukked up already on 2 previous calls they should have been given the benefit of a doubt.

[funnyb25]

This is why it was introduced,you remember this.

I remember that, and that was clear and obvious error. What they are overturning in today's game is not. They are just using VAR to re-do opinion on plays which is total bullshit.

[packerd_00]

I remember that, and that was clear and obvious error. What they are overturning in today's game is not. They are just using VAR to re-do opinion on plays which is total bullshit.

The ones I dont like are when they miss a foul in the penalty box and then go to VAR after the game has continued playing.

[thomorino]

The problem isn't VAR its there is no clear standard for overturning plays. If the standard is what FIFA says it is, clear and obvious, you can't overturn plays every game for being offsides by 1 inch, which is what happened in the Cameroon game.

[swordsandtequila]

Both calls regarding offsides were correct. Stop whining

They're going to look at all goals, close or not.

[2daBank]

Both calls regarding offsides were correct. Stop whining

They're going to look at all goals, close or not.

I dunno why but I believe this guy!!

[Joey Vigs]

This is why it was introduced,you remember this.

[swordsandtequila]

I dunno why but I believe this guy!!

[funnyb25]

Another VAR for no reason in France match

[funnyb25]

Another bullshit call. That is terrible.

[pavyracer]

You can't interfere with the goalie in the box. It's in the rules.

[funnyb25]

You can't interfere with the goalie in the box. It's in the rules.

Goalie did not have possession of the ball. The only thing marginal there was a hand ball into the net which wasn't clear and obvious. That point of VAR is not being maintained at all. In fact, it is the complete opposite.

[Emily_Haines]

They should get rid of replay in all sports. All it does is slow the game down and piss people off.

[pavyracer]

Goalie did not have possession of the ball. The only thing marginal there was a hand ball into the net which wasn't clear and obvious. That point of VAR is not being maintained at all. In fact, it is the complete opposite.

Has nothing to do with possession.

Here is how the rule is worded in FIFA Laws of the Game.

"It is an offence to restrict the movement of the goalkeeper by unfairly impeding him".

[dlowilly]

To hell with Cameroon, spitting on the English players. Vile. If you lost money im not trying to rub it in,I just dont feel bad for them.

Wow I didn't see that, unreal

She's from Cameroon too so it's almost like throwing a knife at her considering what might be in that stuff

[packerd_00]

Wow I didn't see that, unreal

Yep vile bastards. Meant to be women for f@ck sake.

[lakerboy]

Wow I didn't see that, unreal

It wasn't on purpose

[2daBank]

Goalie did not have possession of the ball. The only thing marginal there was a hand ball into the net which wasn't clear and obvious. That point of VAR is not being maintained at all. In fact, it is the complete opposite.

The guy on Brazil says it was right call, imagine that.

[packerd_00]

It wasn't on purpose

Says who,and besides what does that matter.

[fried cheese]

It wasn't on purpose

getting robbed = replay getting close calls right. no call for spitting = wasnt on purpose. very unbiased.

[lakerboy]

Says who,and besides what does that matter.

Go and look at the replay. It was arm to spit not spit to arm

[thomorino]

Every player has a right to the ball, the French player hit the ball when the goalie didn't have control - there was nothing even close to obvious about the call. Replay has its place for obvious calls, like if the ball crossed the goaline or not, quesitonable fouls shouldn't be reviewed unless they are clear and obvious, and that one wasn't even close to being an obvious foul.

[packerd_00]

Go and look at the replay. It was arm to spit not spit to arm

Mate she had phlegm all over her arm. I dont want hear no bullshit excuses.

[lakerboy]

Mate she had flem all over her arm. I dont want hear no bullshit excuses.

Feel however you like. You obviously didn't watch what happened. I personally don't care about that. The ref was a retard in this match

[thomorino]

Goalline technology is great but VAR has been a shit show, the main issue has been no one knows what a clear and obvious error is, they are consistently overturning 50/50 calls.

[packerd_00]

Feel however you like. You obviously didn't watch what happened. I personally don't care about that. The ref was a retard in this match

Ive seen the photographs bud,thats all that counts.