I am starting to see suspicious evidence that; if you're not a "clique" member, you're not considered to be too valuable, and are likely to be ignored quite a lot on P.T. How true do other member's see this as a possibility?
I mean, maybe, if you buck heads with some member's on PT, who are recognized to having plenty of backup clout, do they sometimes PM their palsy-wowsies and say, let's ignore this member because we:
#1. Don't like him.
#2. His agenda, whatever, doesn't fit with ours?
#3. He's new on PT and we don't respect newbies unless they soon fit right in to our buddy-clique?
#4. He may be a trouble maker by using, believable, truthful statements that many seasoned member's find too annoying?
#5. Suspected of being a rat. Turning in member's who seriously break the rules?
#6. Made one too many old veteran member's look like fools because he dominated them in a personal debate?
What do our member's have to say? Anything that would make good sense or anything that might even come close to making good sense?
*My opinion: I'm just , and seeking the truth about SBR and it's member's.
PS: I have great respect for rules and a stickler for rules applying to each and everyone.