Originally Posted by
2daBank
but they are not getting most the action, i dont really buy into those sites that show percentages but all ive seen has more on det and that is backed up by the only real way to know what side taking more money, the line move. ultimately books dont move a line if they getting equal action, they moved it to -3 cause lions taking a bunch of money and they felt they had to offer 3 to bring philly money in..
ive always been of the belief you are much better off capping the game and betting according to where you see discrepancies with the line, trying to figure out a play based off percentage of bets, rlm, sharp/square, is a exercise in futility. im sure there a case to be made for lions that has nothing to do with any of that, problem for me was i could make about as good a case against. i tend to agree det the better team and if you got them less than -3 you have some value, i just didnt think it was enough to warrant a play. gl man