1. 09-01-15 11:34 AM #1
    actiondan
    actiondan's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-16-10
    Posts: 3,028
    Betpoints: 16732

    Bears season win total -7 ?!?!

    Have to lay -200 but how is this not free money?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-01-15 03:29 PM #2
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    i agree, Bears look strong.. should get off to a decent start.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-01-15 03:37 PM #3
    tatddy
    tatddy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-10
    Posts: 10,779
    Betpoints: 608

    He means under 7, Snowball. And if you think the Bears look "strong" you can get +225 on them finishing .500 or better this year.

    To the OP...having a huge limit with a local is the only logical way you can lay -200 on any future at all since your money wouldn't actually be tied up for half a year.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-01-15 03:40 PM #4
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    Bears ready to roll.. you will be surprised.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-01-15 03:41 PM #5
    tatddy
    tatddy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-10
    Posts: 10,779
    Betpoints: 608

    PS if I had to play a wins future, which I wont, I'd take the Rams over 7.5/8 depending on weather you want +150 or even money.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-01-15 03:42 PM #6
    tatddy
    tatddy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-10
    Posts: 10,779
    Betpoints: 608

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowball View Post
    Bears ready to roll.. you will be surprised.
    I have no opinion. Was just pointing out that you misinterpreted his post.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-01-15 03:44 PM #7
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    Quote Originally Posted by tatddy View Post
    I have no opinion. Was just pointing out that you misinterpreted his post.
    I am surprised at that line. Looking at it now.
    Who couldn't think of better bets than laying -200
    that Chicago won't win 7 of 16 games ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-01-15 03:46 PM #8
    trytrytry
    All I do is trytrytry
    trytrytry's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-13-06
    Posts: 23,503
    Betpoints: 273605

    5 wins for bears, easy under
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-01-15 11:58 PM #9
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Maybe Cutler will have a good year and surprises all but I doubt it I think the best the Bears can do a 7–9
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-02-15 12:00 AM #10
    Kermit
    My Finger Smells Like Pork
    Kermit's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-27-10
    Posts: 32,557
    Betpoints: 2611

    Quote Originally Posted by trytrytry View Post
    5 wins for bears, easy under
    I think they squeak out 6 with some goofy shit at the end of a game.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 09-02-15 12:01 AM #11
    TheMoneyShot
    TheMoneyShot's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 28,681
    Betpoints: 23701

    Some sharps must of smoked that UNDER? Don't recall ever seeing an Under at -200 on any WIN/LOSS record before. WOW.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 09-02-15 12:02 AM #12
    Kermit
    My Finger Smells Like Pork
    Kermit's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-27-10
    Posts: 32,557
    Betpoints: 2611

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot View Post
    Some sharps must of smoked that UNDER? Don't recall ever seeing an Under at -200 on any WIN/LOSS record before. WOW.
    You would think it would drop to 6.5 before that kind of juice.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 09-02-15 06:26 AM #13
    newguy
    [Too Long]
    newguy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-27-09
    Posts: 6,100
    Betpoints: 9978

    Quote Originally Posted by Kermit View Post
    You would think it would drop to 6.5 before that kind of juice.
    They will leave it there. Last year o/u was 8 I believe and it was over -300 at one point. They just suckered all the money on the over but books wouldn't move higher because of concerns of people coming back and hammering under. Same thing here. 7 is a good number. 6.5 and you put 7-9 a winning record instead of push. Books don't see Bears getting 8 so they can just keep juicing it to try and entice people to the over. Worst case for them they push but held all that money for 4 months.

    Starters didn't score a Td in pre season. I'm huge Bears fan but this year may be harder to watch than last year and last year sucked.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »