Who (post expansion era) is the best hitter after the batter in front of him was just intentionally walked?
Or in other words, who is the best after an intentional walk?
I am interested in batter's performance after an intentional walk. My local Mets announcers said on a recent broadcast that Kevin McReynolds was at his best when the pitcher intentionally walked Darryl Strawberryto get of him. "McReynolds always seemed to come up with a big hit." The implication is that McReynolds felt the slight, and wanted to make the pitcher pay. Is there any validity to this statement? Who has been the best all-time after an Intentional Base on Balls? It might be a different measure of "clutch." And it might be a (tiny) lineup or pinch-hitter consideration.
Hope you're as interested as Henry was, or at least as interested as I was. I've got some answers: 1. Was Kevin McReynolds "at his best" when the pitcher intentionally walked Darryl Strawberry to get to him? Kevin McReynolds had a .416 OBP and .693 slugging percentage after a batter was intentionally walked in front of him. That's 89 plate appearances, and while not all of them were after a Darryl Strawberry IBB specifically, I have to assume that the IBB, not the Strawman, is the relevant variable here. Was that "his best"? Arguably so! He hit .359/.450/.641 in 120 plate appearances with a runner on third and two outs, which is darned good, and maybe that was his best. He hit .378/.472/.644 with the bases loaded and two outs, but that's only about 50 plate appearances. He hit .346/.471/.769 in 34 plate appearances at Tiger Stadium, which was his very very best, but again, small number of trials. I'm comfortable saying that, in fact, Kevin McReynolds was at his best after a pitcher intentionally walked Darryl Strawberry (or Steve Garvey, or Howard Johnson, or anybody) ahead of him. 2. Who has been the best all-time after an Intentional Base on Balls? Depends how low you want to set the filter. Since 1980, which is all time to me, with a minimum of 10 plate appearances in this situation, it's Nick Markakis, whose .643 OBP and 1.000 SLG gives him the highest-ever post-IBB TAv, at .598. But to get to a decent number of plate appearances ("decent" being relative) requires scrolling nine more spots down the leaderboard:
In all honesty, Bobby Bonilla never struck me as a guy who took much offense. Then I remembered that, actually, he was definitely a guy who took much offense:
Okay, how about this then: In all honesty, Bobby Bonilla never struck me as a guy who didn't switch-hit. It's rare to intentionally walk somebody to get to a switch-hitter, especially one who could really switch-hit. Who are those 38 batters who were passed in favor of Bonilla?
As you can see, a lot of these came away from his Pittsburgh years, but he was good for a lot of non-Pittsburgh years. Those 10 after Rafael Palmeiro came with the Orioles, and he was really good with the Orioles! Maybe it was right-handed pitchers trying to avoid facing Palmeiro with the platoon disadvantage, but Bonilla was also really good against right-handers: .297/.375/.497 those two years, worse than Palmeiro but not IBB-this-guy worse. Anyway. You probably don't even remember Matt Franco, but he got intentionally walked 18 times in his career. Eighteen! The batters after him produced a .183 True Average, and even the non-pitchers in that group produced only a .194 True Average. That's why we have that old baseball saying: "Always intentionally walk Matt Franco." If you want a really good sample, you'd go down to Richie Sexson, with a .478 OBP, 1.069 SLG, and .470 True Average in 69 plate appearances. Nice, nice, nice and niiice. Further down, Manny Ramirez, with 82 plate appearances with .463/.721 and a .384 TAv, which isn't as impressive as Sexson but makes you wonder how 82 people were IBB'd to face Manny Ramirez; did MLB sneak in a season where Ramirez and Bonds were on the same team and we just didn't notice? Finally, if you want somebody with at least 100 trials you get to Jeff Conine, who had a .422 OBP, .585 SLG, and a .340 True Average. He had a .273 career True Average. Jeff Conine was a guy who knew how to take a slight. Unasked questions 3. Who was the worst? One answer: Ryan Spilborghs, 0-for-10, -.0861 True Average Another: Tony Phillips, 0-for-12, but in a much more difficult offensive environment this is actually better than Spilborghs: -.0542 True Average Or: Brent Mayne, who got 33 PAs, and hit .151/.035, some of it in Coors, for an .063 True Average And: Bo Jackson, because scrolling upward he's arguably the first hitter who was actually good. He hit .148/.120 with a .091 True Average. Josh Hamilton, Frank Thomas and Kyle Seager are basically at the same level, but in smaller doses than Jackson, who got 27 shots at this. However, to really answer the question, I prefer this list of hitters who got lots of chances, were generally good, and were occasionally A.J. Pierzynski, let's all point and gloat at A.J. Pierzynski:
A note: Remember, this is since 1980, so some of Winfield's career is excluded. All the same! This table, for reasons obvious, will not appear in Juan Gonzalez's Hall of Fame brochure. 4. And, going down a different track, which intentionally walked hitters had the best cumulative performances by the batters immediately after them? Who is, in other words, the anti-Matt Franco? Requiring a sizeable sample, it's Joey Votto or Raul Ibanez, whose followers were basically identical in 83 plate appearances each. Ibanez gets the nod because seven of the 83 batters after him homered. Cumulative: .463 OBP, .732 SLG, .401 True Average. 5. And the worst? Mike Benjamin's followers went 0-for-19 but they were all pitchers. Let's call this one Andrew McCutchen: Batters after him have gone .154/.088 with a .101 True Average, in 39 tries. 6. And Bonds? Following 688 IBBs, just two of which preceded a pitcher, batters had a .255 True Average. Just a tiny bit worse than the league hits overall. Bonds, meanwhile, was faced 32 times after an intentional walk. He had a .348 True Average.
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
Trivia Time: After the intentional walk.
Reply With Quote