Originally Posted by
Auto Donk
easy answer..... none of the nations you listed ever decided to import hundreds of thousands of africans to own, beat and make perform hard labor, ultimately to see this segment of the population freed from those bonds, then nevertheless put down, beat down for another century, always keepin' em down, such that ghettos formed and crime became totally pervasive therein and around them, and with that crime came killings and black on black crime...... throw in a pervasive drug culture, and the fight to obtain a piece of that illegal pie, gun deaths skyrocketed.......
other factors are: England, guns are not pervasive and never have been; Germany, Hitler's first move was to disarm his own country to lessen resistance therein against his socialist party, making its rise to power much easier -- such that only the Nazi's held guns...... Canada -- very few blacks and too busy making bacon and syrup to kill each other (I love canada for its big deer in saskatchewon/alberta), but it has never had the socio-economic problems mixed with blacks and drugs to have the amount of gun violence we have here in the US..........
as for the French, me and my hunting club could take over the whole fck'n country in two weeks if we were so inclined; too big of pussies to kill outsiders, much less each other with guns.......
australia, what do you expect from a penal colony without a ton of blacks....... white criminals have a common bond, thus no desire to kill one another
ps.......... "assault weapons" of the type you speak of ARE BANNED AND ILLEGAL BUT FOR THE MOST HEAVILY REGULATED segment of the population that can get clearance to own them; a friend of mine is so-licensed, and I'm not even sure you can get those anymore (I'm not a gun nut and could give two fuks about owning a fully auto weapon, my 15-20 guns are all shotguns and rifles, I don't even own a fckin' hand gun, i use a baseball bat, my fists, and my cocck for home protection -- I'm deadly with all three).
but fully auto assault weapons aren't on every corner, and even if they were -- THEY ARE ALREADY ILLEGAL A "double ban" , or triple-ban, isn't going to remove them if the first f'n ban didn't.....
now, as far as "assualt weapons" are concerned, what a crock -- ALL WEAPPONS ARE ASSAULT WEAPONS -- PUTTING emphasis on how a .223 caliber ar-15 is a "deadly assault weapon" -- just because it looks like a military weapon -- is a f'n joke; my 7mm mag that shoots bullets twice as far and far more accurately and is 100 times more lethal in my hands than an uzi or mac 10 in the hands of an amped up Mexican Mafia drug dealer or some spook with a glock on the street corner.....
trust me, you'd much rather get hit with a .87 grain metal bullet fired from a .223 caliber ar-15 or mini-14 than a 150 grain LEAD, pointed soft point fired with twice as much power coming out of the end of my barrell.....
please, please, please let some unrest come down in my neck of the woods........ one isil beheading within twenty miles of my house, and you wussy ass liberals will get a taste of how some good ol Texas boys handle smelly dusty nuts with a religion problem.......