1. #71
    StackinGreen
    Can't stop Won't stop
    StackinGreen's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-09-10
    Posts: 12,141
    Betpoints: 4514

    Mariners are the only staff in the AL better than the White Sox.

    I'll take the OVER 81.5 ALL DAY, their team only got better, and pretty much everywhere. Their bullpen was absolutely horrific last year and it is worlds better.

    Again, 87+ wins, I say

  2. #72
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    not sure why you think the White Sox starting rotation is so good.

    The Tigers starting rotation is deeper IMO.

    yeah the White Sox have a better bullpen than the Tigers but i also think the White Sox line-up is a bit overrated.

    All the Nationals fans said good riddance when they parted ways with LaRoche but somehow White Sox fans think they are getting an MVP type player.

    there is a reason the Nationals kicked him to the curb. Sure he has a little power but he is not a premier middle of the order type hitter

  3. #73
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    not sure why you think the White Sox starting rotation is so good.

    The Tigers starting rotation is deeper IMO.

    yeah the White Sox have a better bullpen than the Tigers but i also think the White Sox line-up is a bit overrated.

    All the Nationals fans said good riddance when they parted ways with LaRoche but somehow White Sox fans think they are getting an MVP type player.

    there is a reason the Nationals kicked him to the curb. Sure he has a little power but he is not a premier middle of the order type hitter
    Sale and Samarzjia > Price and Verlander
    Quintana and Danks > Sanchez and Simon

    Nationals did not kick LaRoche to the curb, he was a free agent, he got a good deal with Chicago, plus the Nationals needed the room at 1B to move Ryan Zimmerman to, because Zimmerman is an atrocious, horrible third baseman they coould not keep him at 3B anymore, because his throws go to places for reasons unknown, two hops to first some times, sometimes to the fourth row in the box seats.

    LaRoche hitting behind Abreu, who hits behind Melke will drive in 85 or more runs.
    A-Ram at SS is one of the better hitting SS's in the game too.

  4. #74
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    LOL at Quintanna and Danks being better than Anibal Sanchez and Simon.

    btw Shane Greene is better than Simon.

    so really Greene and Sanchez are better than Quintanna and Danks.

    you will see Nash... you dont have long to wait.

  5. #75
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Simon is the #5 starter.
    Alfredo Simon is an 8 and 10 pitcher in the AL.
    Alfredo Simon gave up over a homer a game last year, that number will be 1.25 this year.

  6. #76
    EDDIE MONEY LINE
    Get duckets
    EDDIE MONEY LINE's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-24-10
    Posts: 6,298
    Betpoints: 3311

    Mets under. Easiest money I've probably ever seen

  7. #77
    BeanTownClown88
    BeanTownClown88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-08-13
    Posts: 1,961
    Betpoints: 4131

    Mets just need to stay healthy and get guys that can hit...They have a nice young pitching staff, who knows maybe they can surprise

  8. #78
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by EDDIE MONEY LINE View Post
    Mets under. Easiest money I've probably ever seen
    Iffy.
    If Harvey pitches ot his old form, if DeGrom remains lights out, if Wright hits like he is capable of, if Cuddyer stays healthy, if Duda hits 25+ bombs, if Murphy remains his .285 self, Mets will steal a WC.

    If DeGrom comes down to earth, if Harvey isn't healthy, if their BP sucks moose rooster again, under is a lock.

    I'm not walking away from the Mets o/u prop.
    I'm running away from it.

    White Sox over for me.
    Pound that shit.

  9. #79
    broadway6
    on to the next one
    broadway6's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-14-09
    Posts: 13,337
    Betpoints: 1338

    other than angels under... i think i like the padres under 84.5

  10. #80
    Wrigley
    Wrigley's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-28-07
    Posts: 7,268
    Betpoints: 9423

    Twins Under 72.5

  11. #81
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by Wrigley View Post
    Twins Under 72.5
    Twins are going to be a special kind of shitty this year.

    but...
    In 3 years they will be a force, the talent on the farm is deep, and really good.

  12. #82
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by broadway6 View Post
    other than angels under... i think i like the padres under 84.5
    Angels under looks good. LMAO on the Angels thinking they can count on Garrett Richards to be their #1 starter after coming off Tommy John Surgery.

  13. #83
    broadway6
    on to the next one
    broadway6's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-14-09
    Posts: 13,337
    Betpoints: 1338

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    Angels under looks good. LMAO on the Angels thinking they can count on Garrett Richards to be their #1 starter after coming off Tommy John Surgery.


    I can't imagine him being an ace this year.

  14. #84
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    Angels under looks good. LMAO on the Angels thinking they can count on Garrett Richards to be their #1 starter after coming off Tommy John Surgery.
    Ummm, wrong.
    Dream Weaver is the ace of that staff, they are counting on him being the #2 guy.

  15. #85
    STAX
    STAX's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-13
    Posts: 3,718

    interesting how they are capping the AL Central. They have it 1a. CLE 1b. DET 3. CHIW 4. KC 5. MIN

    Top 4 teams between 80 and 84 wins predicted... I am a Tribe fan, and I love our chances this year. Cleveland had the worst defense in the ML last year, we got nothing (and I mean NOTHING) from about our top 6 or 7 players going into the season, yet we still were in the hunt at the end and won 85 games. You want a lock? Detroit under 83.5 or 84.5, you don't just lose a HOF manager, and 2 top 10 pitchers and still be dominant in a division this tough. White Sox are interesting to me, I like their team, KC wont get that dominance from their bullpen another year straight. Bullpen production fluctuates from year to year and its really unpredictable... only thing you can count on is return to the mean.

    Teams I like this year: ANgels, Dodgers, Nats, Cards, Yankees, Indians, Cubs

    Teams I hate: Tigers, Twins, A's, Braves, DBacks, Rockies, Reds, Pirates

  16. #86
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    Ummm, wrong.
    Dream Weaver is the ace of that staff, they are counting on him being the #2 guy.
    If they count on Jared Weaver and CJ Wilson contributing this season they are in for a LONG SEASON

    Both of the pitchers you might as well stick a fork in them b.c they are done.

  17. #87
    mr. leisure
    mr. leisure's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-29-08
    Posts: 17,505
    Betpoints: 33098

    Cleveland over
    a`s under
    braves under

  18. #88
    Fidel_CashFlow
    Fidel_CashFlow's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-03-12
    Posts: 53,995
    Betpoints: 30419

    crazy

    not a single soul has mentioned a team im lookin @ very closely right now

  19. #89
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    If they count on Jared Weaver and CJ Wilson contributing this season they are in for a LONG SEASON

    Both of the pitchers you might as well stick a fork in them b.c they are done.
    How exactly is Jared Weaver washed up?
    You can't really be this stupid.
    Maybe you are.

    Weaver led the major leagues last season in games started.
    34
    Started every game.

    18 game winner.
    18-9 3.59 / 1.20
    3:1 K to BB ratio-sound
    over 7 K's oer 9-sound.

    Do those sound like numbers of a washed up pitcher.

    Bear you better step up your game, people are pm'ing me you don't know what you are talking about.

  20. #90
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by Fidel_CashFlow View Post
    crazy

    not a single soul has mentioned a team im lookin @ very closely right now
    Who?
    I have the Steamer, and PECOTA numbers in my database open right now, I can help.

  21. #91
    FlyinAir
    SDQL
    FlyinAir's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-14-14
    Posts: 1,612
    Betpoints: 221

    Locked in my only two for the season

    Pads under 86 -115
    Cubs under 82.5 -110

  22. #92
    Cross
    Cross's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-15-11
    Posts: 5,777
    Betpoints: 9281

    I'll take yanks under, always overrated.

  23. #93
    Fidel_CashFlow
    Fidel_CashFlow's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-03-12
    Posts: 53,995
    Betpoints: 30419

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    Who?
    I have the Steamer, and PECOTA numbers in my database open right now, I can help.
    does not matter as much now. Was the rangers sitting at 77 wins, its not adjusted accordingly @ 79 and 79.5

    but one I really am liking at the moment is Royals over 79 wins

  24. #94
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Weaver aint #1 starter material anymore

    he aint scaring anybody with that 87mph fastball

  25. #95
    Stokes36
    Stokes36's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-17-13
    Posts: 494
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    Angels under looks good. LMAO on the Angels thinking they can count on Garrett Richards to be their #1 starter after coming off Tommy John Surgery.
    Umm...he tore his patellar tendon in his left knee. lol. Not even the same body part.

  26. #96
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by Stokes36 View Post
    Umm...he tore his patellar tendon in his left knee. lol. Not even the same body part.
    oh well then that makes sense. My mistake... i saw him on a Angels depth chart as the #1 starter and i thought to my self no fukkin way they are going to rely on a guy coming off injury to be their go to guy.

    i would not trust any of the pitchers coming back off tommy john to automatically go right back to where they left off.

    Jose Fernandez, Matt Harvey etc...

    I like Garrett Richards but i just dont think he is ready to take 200 inning load.

    for the Angels to be successful this year they need 15 wins each from CJ Wilson and Jared Weaver and that is not happening.

  27. #97
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Weaver is the same pitcher he was 6 months ago, he won 18.
    Why isn't he winning 15 this season all of a sudden?

  28. #98
    jt315
    jt315's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-12-11
    Posts: 20,382
    Betpoints: 13760

    Shoemaker looked pretty impressive last year. Why can't he win 15? Solid no. 3

  29. #99
    Andy117
    Andy117's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-07-10
    Posts: 9,511
    Betpoints: 25689

    Quote Originally Posted by EDDIE MONEY LINE View Post
    Mets under. Easiest money I've probably ever seen
    The Mets won 79 last year without Harvey. They have tons of pitching depth. Their bullpen was pretty good for most of the 2nd half. It'd be hard for them to get less out of LF than they did last year.
    I think you're gonna lost that money.

  30. #100
    StackinGreen
    Can't stop Won't stop
    StackinGreen's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-09-10
    Posts: 12,141
    Betpoints: 4514

    Sale injury, haha, but not how Big Bear saw it.

    Will that total move back to 81.5?

  31. #101
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyinAir View Post
    Locked in my only two for the season

    Pads under 86 -115
    Cubs under 82.5 -110
    Cubs may win 96 games pal

  32. #102
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by StackinGreen View Post
    Sale injury, haha, but not how Big Bear saw it.

    Will that total move back to 81.5?
    he is skinny as a toothpick he needs to eat better and get in the gym

  33. #103
    Chi_archie
    GASPING FOR AIR
    Chi_archie's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-22-08
    Posts: 63,130
    Betpoints: 2368

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    he is skinny as a toothpick he needs to eat better and get in the gym

    and not jump off his truck

  34. #104
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Bear View Post
    Cubs may win 96 games pal
    Really?

    You know Soler and Baez and Bryant are a strikeout waiting to happen.
    Their strikout out rate is eye popping high.
    Even Rizzo.

    I will start every strikeout staters in daily leagues against the Cubs this year and make a fortune.

    Kershaw or Cueto or any a healty Fernandez, or a healthy Harvey or even DeGrom could have seven combined strikeouts alone off of Baez and Bryant and Soler.

    Cubs ain't winning 96.

    Just go to fangraphs, click the links under the players name.
    Cubs have no chance, less than zero chance of winning 96

    Player PA BB% K% ISO BABIP
    Kris Bryant 557 9.30% 32.90% 0.244 0.344
    Anthony Rizzo 651 10.80% 20.00% 0.224 0.299
    Starlin Castro 674 5.30% 16.50% 0.143 0.325
    Arismendy Alcantara 645 6.20% 26.50% 0.184 0.316
    Miguel Montero 529 11.00% 21.20% 0.127 0.289
    Javier Baez 650 5.80% 32.60% 0.214 0.302
    Dexter Fowler 526 13.90% 22.20% 0.137 0.338
    Addison Russell 407 6.60% 24.80% 0.161 0.302
    Welington Castillo 417 7.70% 24.20% 0.147 0.304
    Albert Almora 576 3.00% 17.00% 0.118 0.301
    Tommy La Stella 459 8.70% 10.90% 0.098 0.293
    Rafael Lopez 394 8.60% 21.60% 0.093 0.292
    Jorge Soler 345 7.80% 22.30% 0.208 0.294
    Mike Olt 423 9.70% 32.60% 0.179 0.276
    Kyle Schwarber 591 8.30% 25.40% 0.193 0.283
    Matt Szczur 553 6.10% 17.90% 0.08 0.301
    Christian Villanueva 543 5.30% 26.20% 0.142 0.297
    Chris Denorfia 395 7.30% 17.00% 0.11 0.302

  35. #105
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Fangraphs is just someones opinion Nasher.

    Cubs really have no weaknesses

    1.Fowler
    2. Coughlan
    3. Castro
    4. Rizzo

    that top 4 is a proven commodity.

    you have a catcher in the #8 spot who will 20-25 HR's

    5-7

    Soler, Bryant and Baez will be some of the most exciting players to watch this year

    think Mike Trout and Yasiel Puig - that is the type of potential these players have.
    Last edited by Big Bear; 03-02-15 at 04:18 PM.

First 1234 Last
Top