[Ghenghis Kahn]

Seattle was a one hit wonder.

Brady picked apart their defense in crunch time to the tune of 14 points with the game on the line in the final 9 minutes.

LOB? Lmao. LOB couldn't stop a bunch of short white guys, Gronk, and Brady.

Patriots greatest dynasty ever.

Rain City Bitch Pigeons one hit wonder.

settle down pal. how much did you win? $50?

[boomer62]

All Pat fans talking shit and gloating are Classless and JERK OFFS. Unbelievable how you come on here and GLOAT when you won by the skin of your teeth and 99% of the time with three cracks into the end zone less then a yard THEY SCORE! And you wonder why people despise the Pats. Lets see what happens next with the investigation, arrogance never wins out.

[Ghenghis Kahn]

he had $0 on the pats. that's right $0.

clown talking shiit about the hawks and puts nothing on the pats.

he's just bitter he lost his under. done feeding the troll.

[stevenash]

he had $0 on the pats. that's right $0.

clown talking shiit about the hawks and puts nothing on the pats.

he's just bitter he lost his under. done feeding the troll.

Did I lose nanci boi?

290862839-1	2/2/15 7:16pm	$324.00	$300.00	$624.00	Win	2/2/15 7:35pm Reduced Basketball 708 Brooklyn Nets +8½ -108* vs Los Angeles Clippers
290625498-1	2/1/15 5:13pm	$200.00	$452.00	$652.00	Win	2 Team Parlay
					Win	2/1/15 6:30pm NFL Football 101 New England Patriots/Seattle Seahawks 1st Quarter Under 10 -131*
	2/2/15 3:11pm				Win	2/2/15 8:05pm NBA Basketball 710 New Orleans Pelicans +4 -118* vs Atlanta Hawks
290601054-1	2/1/15 3:58pm	$550.00	$500.00	$1050.00	Win	2/1/15 3:00pm College Basketball 817 Connecticut/Houston U 2nd Half Over 66½ -110*

gtfoh with your nonsense.[/QUOTE]

[BigDofBA]

settle down pal. how much did you win? $50?

$250

Not that much money. Just having fun with it.

[stevenash]

he had $0 on the pats. that's right $0.

clown talking shiit about the hawks and puts nothing on the pats.

he's just bitter he lost his under. done feeding the troll.

You're turn asshole

[Ghenghis Kahn]

Did I lose nanci boi?

290862839-1	2/2/15 7:16pm	$324.00	$300.00	$624.00	Win	2/2/15 7:35pm Reduced Basketball 708 Brooklyn Nets +8½ -108* vs Los Angeles Clippers
290625498-1	2/1/15 5:13pm	$200.00	$452.00	$652.00	Win	2 Team Parlay
					Win	2/1/15 6:30pm NFL Football 101 New England Patriots/Seattle Seahawks 1st Quarter Under 10 -131*
	2/2/15 3:11pm				Win	2/2/15 8:05pm NBA Basketball 710 New Orleans Pelicans +4 -118* vs Atlanta Hawks
290601054-1	2/1/15 3:58pm	$550.00	$500.00	$1050.00	Win	2/1/15 3:00pm College Basketball 817 Connecticut/Houston U 2nd Half Over 66½ -110*

gtfoh with your nonsense.

[/QUOTE]

do you want me to bury you? do i have to bump your post where you said you only have the under?

[stevenash]

Bring it Ghenghis.
penetrating faggboy

[Ghenghis Kahn]

You're turn asshole

show me your pats bet you fukking fraud.

[stevenash]

do you want me to bury you? do i have to bump your post where you said you only have the under?[/QUOTE]

Yeah fagg boy, I lost 315 to lose 300 under 300 on the under.
Long story short I made a profit asshole.
Your turn asshole

[stevenash]

show me your pats bet you fukking fraud.

I just did asshole

[EmpireMaker]

I agree and have been saying the same thing. The only thing I believe they should have done differently would be to throw the fade route to the corner of the end zone where only the Sea. player could have caught it instead of throwing into the middle.

[stevenash]

I lost 315 to win 300 on under 48 and still made a profit.
God, what an asshole you are.

[stevenash]

show me your pats bet you fukking fraud.

No response asshole?
Have a good night asshole.

[Ghenghis Kahn]

Right here.
I don't have the Pats.
I don't have Seattle.

I have the under, and only the under.

fukking fraud. why didn't you have a wager on the pats if seattle is over-rated and they didn't belong?

[Ghenghis Kahn]

No response asshole?
Have a good night asshole.

are you gonna bury me like how you buried me when i said jews control the banking system?

you're a fukking fraud that didn't have money on the pats.

[boomer62]

I lost 315 to win 300 on under 48 and still made a profit.
God, what an asshole you are.

Did he hit a nerve. Come down with the anger Mr self-righteousness unless it comes to cheating then that's okay.

[stevenash]

fukking fraud. why didn't you have a wager on the pats if seattle is over-rated and they didn't belong?

Because I had a 200 dollar bet with a co-worker.
I didn't need anymore action on that side.

I own your ass.

[Ghenghis Kahn]

Did he hit a nerve. Come down with the anger Mr self-righteousness unless it comes to cheating then that's okay.

of course i did. he's a fukking fraud. do you see how this fraud is trying to redirect the argument?

[stevenash]

Did he hit a nerve. Come down with the anger Mr self-righteousness unless it comes to cheating then that's okay.

Another loser joins in.

[stevenash]

of course i did. he's a fukking fraud. do you see how this fraud is trying to redirect the argument?

Yeah, whatever.
If that gets you through the night loser boy

[Ghenghis Kahn]

Because I had a 200 dollar bet with a co-worker.
I didn't need anymore action on that side.

I own your ass.

you are a tool. you point out that seattle is over-rated and do not belong in the super bowl.

so i call you out and you try to redirect what i said by posting some basketball plays?

you should become a politician. nice try though you fukking fraud.

[boomer62]

Now I see why people talk trash about Nash. Guy is always arguing in every thread and bashing others. Definitely has to be right at all costs. But doesn't realize his self righteousness has a cost. Should read DaleCarnegie's "how to win friends and influence people" Nash, bet you don't have many friends. Or read 7 habits of highly effective people. Habit #4 Seek first to understand then be understood. You seem to want to be understood and right all the time. Just trying to help

[stevenash]

you are a tool. you point out that seattle is over-rated and do not belong in the super bowl.

so i call you out and you try to redirect what i said by posting some basketball plays?

you should become a politician. nice try though you fukking fraud.

Let's see.

Hmm, I had over 48 on the total, lost that bet.
But I had a parlay with the under 1Q and a basketball game, and won that.
Had NE on side bets and won that.
And on and on and on....

Sorry about your damn luck, I cleared 2K this weekend, how you do loser boy?

[stevenash]

Now I see why people talk trash about Nash. Guy is always arguing in every thread and bashing others. Definitely has to be right at all costs. But doesn't realize his self righteousness has a cost. Should read DaleCarnegie's "how to win friends and influence people" Nash, bet you don't have many friends. Or read 7 habits of highly effective people. Habit #4 Seek first to understand then be understood. You seem to want to be understood and right all the time. Just trying to help

Who talks trash about me?
Leet? Guy is a proven loser?
Who else big boy?

[Ghenghis Kahn]

Let's see.

Hmm, I had over 48 on the total, lost that bet.
But I had a parlay with the under 1Q and a basketball game, and won that.
Had NE on side bets and won that.
And on and on and on....

Sorry about your damn luck, I cleared 2K this weekend, how you do loser boy?

Because I had a 200 dollar bet with a co-worker.
I didn't need anymore action on that side.

ok last post not gonna waste anymore time with a fraud like yourself.

according to you, seattle is over-rated and doesn't belong in the super bowl. new england is clearly the superior team.

so are you telling me, $200 action with your coworker was enough action for a degenerate that bet $500 on 2nd half college basketball totals?

why not go all-on the pats if seattle really sucked that bad?

lol you fukking fraud. more you speak, the more you're getting exposed. i'd just stop and bail if i were you like how you bailed in that jew banking thread...

[stevenash]

ok last post not gonna waste anymore time with a fraud like yourself.

according to you, seattle is over-rated and doesn't belong in the super bowl. new england is clearly the superior team.

so are you telling me, $200 action with your coworker was enough action for a degenerate that bet $500 on 2nd half college basketball totals?

why not go all-on the pats if seattle really sucked that bad?

lol you fukking fraud. more you speak, the more you're getting exposed. i'd just stop and bail if i were you like how you bailed in that jew banking thread...

[stevenash]

ok last post not gonna waste anymore time with a fraud like yourself.

according to you, seattle is over-rated and doesn't belong in the super bowl. new england is clearly the superior team.

so are you telling me, $200 action with your coworker was enough action for a degenerate that bet $500 on 2nd half college basketball totals?

why not go all-on the pats if seattle really sucked that bad?

lol you fukking fraud. more you speak, the more you're getting exposed. i'd just stop and bail if i were you like how you bailed in that jew banking thread...

You are so fukkng clueless.

[KRIT]

Actually OP is wrong. Here's why. I've looked at this many ways, seeing that i lost almost a dime on the seahawks.

When Lynch had his first down run to the one-yard line, by the time the play was over, there was about 1 minute left in the game. That means, they have roughly 50 seconds to run 2 plays. Very do-able in a hurry up offense, especially if you are just running the ball. So they could have ran three times in a row, and then taken a timeout after third down.

Instead, Seahawks burned about 35 seconds of clock after Lynch took it to the one-yard line.

Even if throwing it on 2nd down was the right call, which i do understand, throwing a slant to Ricardo Lockette over the middle....really? Either throw to the outside or put Wilson on the move on a boot or play action.

Sorry, but still a horrible call however you want to spin it.

[sneakerhead]

Actually OP is wrong. Here's why. I've looked at this many ways, seeing that i lost almost a dime on the seahawks.

When Lynch had his first down run to the one-yard line, by the time the play was over, there was about 1 minute left in the game. That means, they have roughly 50 seconds to run 2 plays. Very do-able in a hurry up offense, especially if you are just running the ball. So they could have ran three times in a row, and then taken a timeout after third down.

Instead, Seahawks burned about 35 seconds of clock after Lynch took it to the one-yard line.

Even if throwing it on 2nd down was the right call, which i do understand, throwing a slant to Ricardo Lockette over the middle....really? Either throw to the outside or put Wilson on the move on a boot or play action.

Sorry, but still a horrible call however you want to spin it.

I think some had to do with Bellichick not calling a timeout, Pete definitely expected that Patriots will call a timeout and that probably created some time of confusion in play calling. If Bill did call a timeout, im sure it was gonna be a run play.

[thechaoz]

Wrong

[upscope]

If they failed on second down, they could spike on third down. Then push the line on fourth. But the slant was terrible.

[upscope]

Why does eveybody always want to see winning tickets?? Who gives a fk if they really bet what they say they did?? One guy has a hard on trying to convince cyber space that he bet on the winning team when he obviously didn't & the other guy has an even bigger hard on demanding to see a ticket that doesn't exist!!

[fly fisher]

Actually OP is wrong. Here's why. I've looked at this many ways, seeing that i lost almost a dime on the seahawks.

When Lynch had his first down run to the one-yard line, by the time the play was over, there was about 1 minute left in the game. That means, they have roughly 50 seconds to run 2 plays. Very do-able in a hurry up offense, especially if you are just running the ball. So they could have ran three times in a row, and then taken a timeout after third down.

Instead, Seahawks burned about 35 seconds of clock after Lynch took it to the one-yard line.

Even if throwing it on 2nd down was the right call, which i do understand, throwing a slant to Ricardo Lockette over the middle....really? Either throw to the outside or put Wilson on the move on a boot or play action.

Sorry, but still a horrible call however you want to spin it.

I agree and if you really want to pass with that many people stacked in the box you run the slant then delay flat off of play action to lynch so that they commit to lynch

[dalogester]

I won on pats. No ticket necessary. Seacocks got a taste of their own medicine. Fk that arrogant team and that gum chomping cheating coach.
I'm more happy about the seacocks losing then me winning $350.