[t-wizzle]

Like I said before the series started, this is going to be a short series.

Spurs should sweep or win in 5. There's no way they don't get one in OKC. This Thunder team just can't hang with the well oiled machine that is the San Antonio Spurs.

[Big Bear]

good luck

[THam12]

Like I said before the series started, this is going to be a short series.

Spurs should sweep or win in 5. There's no way they don't get one in OKC. This Thunder team just can't hang with the well oiled machine that is the San Antonio Spurs.

But before playoffs started you said spurs would be lucky to win 1 series????
Im dumbfounded.

[crustyme]

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-ta...l#post21756119
total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Pacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
​Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loser


0-36 -158 psi

lol

[TheMoneyShot]

But before playoffs started you said spurs would be lucky to win 1 series????
Im dumbfounded.

It's called following line movement you dumb fuk. Who cares what he said before the playoffs started.

With an opening line like that... clearly San Antonio is the play. It's an embarrassment to OKC for a line that low.

[Cuse0323]

Looks too good to be true but Spurs should roll again.

[t-wizzle]

And yet the only future bet I've taken on Spurs all year was for them to either sweep or win in 5 in this series.

Get with the program.

[BadLuckSanta]

http://abload.de/img/okcspursjhs92.gif

[THam12]

It's called following line movement you dumb fuk. Who cares what he said before the playoffs started.

With an opening line like that... clearly San Antonio is the play. It's an embarrassment to OKC for a line that low.

Im talking about now he is saying they are this "well oiled machine" but before the playoffs started he had no respect for them.
Was he asleep the whole season while the spurs were playing just like they are now. Dont know why people are surprised.

[jjgold]

As long as Westbrook plays it's a great spurs play

He is killing this team
Too many bad shots

[crustyme]

And yet the only future bet I've taken on Spurs all year was for them to either sweep or win in 5 in this series.

Get with the program.

says the retard who picked the thunder to win last night.

Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loser

another lakerboy "hedge" from the dumbfuk.

lol

[t-wizzle]

Im talking about now he is saying they are this "well oiled machine" but before the playoffs started he had no respect for them.
Was he asleep the whole season while the spurs were playing just like they are now. Dont know why people are surprised.

Lmao I've been calling them that for years here.

Stay in your lane.

[t-wizzle]

http://abload.de/img/okcspursjhs92.gif

This is hilarious.

Lil B at the end

[BennyBigNuts]

Don't mush me you fukkkk

[t-wizzle]

Don't mush me you fukkkk

Benny big idiot lol.

If anyone is the mush it would be you being that I actually made my bets BEFORE the series whereas you needed to wait a game to have an opinion on the series.

[THam12]

Lmao I've been calling them that for years here.

Stay in your lane.

And you claimed that theyd be "lucky" to win one series in the playoffs this year.... doesn't make sense to me why youre now all over their nuts. Probably because you clearly dont know shit. Who did you think would out them in the playoffs if you think OKC is much inferior?????

[BennyBigNuts]

Benny big idiot lol.

If anyone is the mush it would be you being that I actually made my bets BEFORE the series whereas you needed to wait a game to have an opinion on the series.

Don't think you can be any dumber with that statement. Try reading that again and give yourself a chance to realize what an idiot you are.

[BennyBigNuts]

You're ok twizzler, I just wish you would stop making threads.

[t-wizzle]

THam go pound sand buddy.

I said I was wrong about Spurs. I also think they got a favorable matchup both last round and especially this round with Ibaka out.

I said from the getgo that Clippers and Rockets would give them a hard time. Clippers had a crucial game stolen from them last series by a bad call at the end.

[t-wizzle]

Benny let's try to comprehend pal. I bet on Spurs sweep and 4-1 PRE-SERIES. You took them after game 1.

There's only one possible mush in that scenario but the truth is Spurs got this one locked down.

[THam12]

THam go pound sand buddy.

I said I was wrong about Spurs. I also think they got a favorable matchup both last round and especially this round with Ibaka out.

I said from the getgo that Clippers and Rockets would give them a hard time. Clippers had a crucial game stolen from them last series by a bad call at the end.

Fair enough

[BennyBigNuts]

Benny let's try to comprehend pal. I bet on Spurs sweep and 4-1 PRE-SERIES. You took them after game 1.

There's only one possible mush in that scenario but the truth is Spurs got this one locked down.

That's the kind of thing "sharp money" does.
You wouldn't know anything about that though.

Get at me when they sweep.

[Seto]

Spurs might win by DD too. Gotta look into alt spreads.

[t-wizzle]

Spurs might win by DD too. Gotta look into alt spreads.

You think pal?

[Seto]

You think pal?

This is just too much of a mismatch... I've seen enough at this point. Plus which the Spurs aren't the Heat who are always an easy fade in game 3 when they're up 2-0. Especially not after what happened 2 years ago.

[crustyme]

whats funny is that this airbetting broketard dropped 158 air units the past week alone and cant post his spreadsheet and brag about how good he in the nba anymore.

lol

lost his ass in nfl
lost his ass in college football
lost his ass in college basketball
lost his ass in march madness
lost his ass in hockey
lost his ass in golf
losing his ass in nba

down over 500 air units the past few months.

hilarious.

lol

[t-wizzle]

This is just too much of a mismatch... I've seen enough at this point. Plus which the Spurs aren't the Heat who are always an easy fade in game 3 when they're up 2-0. Especially not after what happened 2 years ago.

Do you think the extra days off will disrupt their flow?

[Seto]

Do you think the extra days off will disrupt their flow?

They came out flat in game 3 in Memphis last year after a similar rest so maybe. But I think it's hard to compare both series. I have the Spurs going for the kill here.

What adjustments can OKC really make at this point? I mean their offensive sets have always been bad so it's not like it's going to start flowing tomorrow. Their defensive philosophy has always sucked too and a lot of their issues look like they were hidden by Ibaka's presence. They've tried every lineup in the book and nothing has worked.

What could change I guess is Durant being more aggressive and he's still the best player on the floor but he looks done. Time to get in the gym lol. Figured you'd have bumped that thread by now.

[t-wizzle]

They came out flat in game 3 in Memphis last year after a similar rest so maybe. But I think it's hard to compare both series. I have the Spurs going for the kill here.

What adjustments can OKC really make at this point? I mean their offensive sets have always been bad so it's not like it's going to start flowing tomorrow. Their defensive philosophy has always sucked too and a lot of their issues look like they were hidden by Ibaka's presence. They've tried every lineup in the book and nothing has worked.

What could change I guess is Durant being more aggressive and he's still the best player on the floor but he looks done. Time to get in the gym lol. Figured you'd have bumped that thread by now.

The only difference is the possibility of role players having a great game and Durant, Westbrook and co. feeding off the energy.

[Seto]

The only difference is the possibility of role players having a great game and Durant, Westbrook and co. feeding off the energy.

Their role players played pretty good yesterday tbh (part of why they had the lead early)

BENCH	MIN	FGM-A	3PM-A	FTM-A	OREB	DREB	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	PF	+/-	PTS
Perry Jones, SF	24	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	4	4	0	0	1	0	3	-22	2
Caron Butler, SF	19	4-8	1-3	0-0	1	3	4	1	0	0	3	0	-6	9
Steven Adams, C	33	4-5	0-0	1-4	5	3	8	1	0	1	2	2	-19	9
Reggie Jackson, PG	26	4-7	0-1	0-0	0	3	3	4	0	0	2	1	-11	8
Derek Fisher, PG	22	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	1	1	4	0	0	0	4	-5	2
Jeremy Lamb, SG	14	6-8	0-1	1-1	0	1	1	1	2	0	1	1	-6	13
Andre Roberson, SG	7	0-3	0-0	0-0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	-5	0

Now at home it's different especially with that crowd but I dunno... I've been "scared" to fade OKC these first 2 games because they have their 2 stars but the bottom line is the Spurs are just too good for them I think...

[jtoler]

Their role players played pretty good yesterday tbh (part of why they had the lead early)

BENCH	MIN	FGM-A	3PM-A	FTM-A	OREB	DREB	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	PF	+/-	PTS
Perry Jones, SF	24	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	4	4	0	0	1	0	3	-22	2
Caron Butler, SF	19	4-8	1-3	0-0	1	3	4	1	0	0	3	0	-6	9
Steven Adams, C	33	4-5	0-0	1-4	5	3	8	1	0	1	2	2	-19	9
Reggie Jackson, PG	26	4-7	0-1	0-0	0	3	3	4	0	0	2	1	-11	8
Derek Fisher, PG	22	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	1	1	4	0	0	0	4	-5	2
Jeremy Lamb, SG	14	6-8	0-1	1-1	0	1	1	1	2	0	1	1	-6	13
Andre Roberson, SG	7	0-3	0-0	0-0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	-5	0

Now at home it's different especially with that crowd but I dunno... I've been "scared" to fade OKC these first 2 games because they have their 2 stars but the bottom line is the Spurs are just too good for them I think...

I think Lamb's numbers are 4th quarter garbage numbers, other times Id probably be leaning OKC for Game 3, but they are just missing too much. Spurs constantly move for 24 seconds each possession, its hard to defend every time for 24 seconds, what they look for and usually find is any moment of defensive lapse and a man gets a hedge, a slight opening from a cut, an opening from anything and they take advantage. If the Spurs were mainly only hitting jumpers Id lean OKC here but Spurs are getting it anyway they want, inside, outside, mid range, you name it. I can only see this spread going down.

[The Kraken]

Agree 1000%

Line should close as a pk'em or Spurs favored

This isn't the same OKC team that beat LA

This OKC team would've an 8 seed at best

Bet whatever you can get down

[Seto]

I think Lamb's numbers are 4th quarter garbage numbers, other times Id probably be leaning OKC for Game 3, but they are just missing too much. Spurs constantly move for 24 seconds each possession, its hard to defend every time for 24 seconds, what they look for and usually find is any moment of defensive lapse and a man gets a hedge, a slight opening from a cut, an opening from anything and they take advantage. If the Spurs were mainly only hitting jumpers Id lean OKC here but Spurs are getting it anyway they want, inside, outside, mid range, you name it. I can only see this spread going down.

Lamb was yeah but they had a couple guys contributing early especially Adams.

Agreed. It's just too much of a mismatch. No zig zag here...

[t-wizzle]

Yea Seto those are extended garbage time numbers as they kept saying on the telecast.

I agree Adams played well but it didn't stop the Spurs from dominating the paint scoring. I'm more talking about timely 3s from perimeter players.

[Big Bear]

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-ta...l#post21756119
total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Pacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
​Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loser


0-36 -158 psi

lol

crusty you are very good at what you do. If i was an SBR pro i would pay you in points if you would troll a few posters for me...