1. #36
    statnerds
    Put me in coach
    statnerds's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-23-09
    Posts: 4,047
    Betpoints: 103

    Quote Originally Posted by HeeeHAWWWW View Post
    It'll help losing players that are +EV but -EG though, by definition (ie those making good bets but drastically over-staking). That seems to be rather a lot of people.

    The simulation: you can select a negative to plus error range, and definitely should do so imo.
    i do like that. now you have me considering the true crux of the problem. i tend to believe the majority of bettors are -EV players. however, more than willing to accept your premise and explore that a potential larger problem isn't -EV, but a lack of discipline. but if over staking is the problem why not just tie these players to 1% flat betting and keep them there?

    maybe if we could get bettors to start at the end, ie what figure they want to achieve, and work backwards. it would introduce a whole bunch of reality to the equation.

    but i do like where you are coming from on this post. love when a post makes me review my stance on an issue.

  2. #37
    HeeeHAWWWW
    HeeeHAWWWW's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-13-08
    Posts: 5,487
    Betpoints: 578

    Quote Originally Posted by statnerds View Post
    i tend to believe the majority of bettors are -EV players.
    Yeah, I'd go with that - if I had to guess I'd say 95%+. Obviously no staking system can help them (well aside from results suggesting they are -EV, then Kelly says not to stake at all!).


    however, more than willing to accept your premise and explore that a potential larger problem isn't -EV, but a lack of discipline. but if over staking is the problem why not just tie these players to 1% flat betting and keep them there?
    Ultimately the purpose of using Kelly is optimal bankroll growth, both theoretical and practical (in my larger backtests it consistently provides about 20-25% more RoI). Thus, it's more of a refinement than a critical component - as long as you're not over-staking you're fine.

    The major problem with stake sizes of 1% is how difficult it is to make any serious profit. For example, if your average edge is 5%, to achieve 50% (median) bankroll growth you'll need around 900 bets. Partly that just reflects a basic truth of gambling: you need either very large volume, or a hefty bankroll.
    Last edited by HeeeHAWWWW; 04-23-14 at 07:28 AM.

  3. #38
    Jason Jones
    Jason Jones's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-18-14
    Posts: 28
    Betpoints: 42

    This is complicated stuff lol

First 12
Top