1. #1
    easyliving
    easyliving's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-25-12
    Posts: 8,876
    Betpoints: 11

    Any significance of beating first half closers in NBA?

    I have started tracking my 1h plays in NBA compared to Pinny closers over the past month and most of the time I am getting a better # than the closing line, meaning if I take under 99.5 the line closes at 99 or if I take +6 line closes +5.5 etc. My sample size is just over 100 bets at the point but at this point I am confident I can keep it going and will continue to beat the closing lines. I am hitting just over 54% at this point on these wagers alone, but my sample size is simply too small. Are Pinnacle's first half lines as sharp as their lines in other sports and can I expect my profits to continue longterm?

  2. #2
    downsouth
    Bobbywaves is a stiff
    downsouth's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-13-11
    Posts: 11,579
    Betpoints: 25117

    Generally beating the closing line will correlate with winning. It will not be as significant on the totals but is a pretty significant amount getting a .5 point on half wagers for sides. Continue tracking, find an average CLV for sides and totals over a meaningful sample size and then determine if your generally beating the close. If you are odds are you will also be hitting a profitable win rate.

    Good luck

  3. #3
    gui_m_p
    gui_m_p's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-13
    Posts: 123
    Betpoints: 1537

    I think you can expect a long term profit. A 0.5 point in basketball generally represents a difference of 0.06 in decimal odds (not with totals). So think that, if you bet +6 and line closes +5.5, you basically bet +5.5 with (almost) +odds. This probably will be enough to win in long haul.

    Moreover, I don't think that firts half lines are less sharper than full game. If I'm right a move in one come along with the other.

  4. #4
    deltgen
    deltgen's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-31-10
    Posts: 865
    Betpoints: 4528

    easyliving--I want to keep track of this thread, but I'm curious about something. You say that at about 100 bets that your sample size is too small, which I agree with, but what would be considered an acceptable and meaningful sample size for something like this?

  5. #5
    gui_m_p
    gui_m_p's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-13
    Posts: 123
    Betpoints: 1537

    I don't think the sample is that small. The skill of a handicapper is not susceptible to variance like a game outcome. I use to track the CLV of people I intend to follow and, for what I see, the CLV is relatively stable. Of course a grater sample is better, but with 100 plays you can have a good idea of what you are capable of.

Top