Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard...
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
11-05-13 06:50 AM #1
A -415 NHL side
-
11-05-13 07:01 AM #2
jeeeesus
Heritage -440
-
11-05-13 07:45 AM #3
-
11-05-13 08:22 AM #4
i would never lay -400 in hockey, even if i knew the line would be off
-
11-05-13 08:28 AM #5
Three things...
#1. It is Buffalo
#2. It is SJ on Home Ice
#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?)
Originally Posted by jayc88
But you are correct
-
11-05-13 08:36 AM #6
they're not 0-2...they're 0-0-2...losing in OT or shootout is a lot different in hockey than losing in regulation time Originally Posted by Sam Odom
Three things...
#1. It is Buffalo
#2. It is SJ on Home Ice
#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?)
But you are correct
-
11-05-13 08:43 AM #7
Originally Posted by Russian Rocket
True in the way the NHL scores it... Sammy believes they are 10-1-3 but psychologically they are 0-2 last two. At least that is the way the sports press are writing it
-
11-05-13 08:46 AM #8
I would risk $40,000 if I had it Sammy on this
Its a sure thingPoints Awarded:
VegasInsider gave jjgold 5 SBR Point(s) for this post.
-
11-05-13 08:48 AM #9
Originally Posted by jjgold
Its a sure thing
Considering all things... you are mostly right
-
11-05-13 08:48 AM #10
actually psychologically they are 0-0-2...I'm not sure if you followed those games or not, but Sharks were on a verge of winning them both. The loss to LA in OT is legit...but losing to Yotes in shootout is a flip coin, so I'm not sure how you can put any weight on them going 0-2 here. Originally Posted by Sam Odom
-
11-05-13 08:48 AM #11
i've heard brock landers needs this one badly to make up for the Packers debacle yesterday.
-
11-05-13 09:04 AM #12
Not even Brock would do this one... Would he ?
-
11-05-13 09:06 AM #13
So do we bet the doggy
-
11-05-13 09:19 AM #14
What about taking Buffalo +1.5 (EV)
I like those odds.
-
11-05-13 09:22 AM #15
Originally Posted by VegasInsider
If playing a side probably best option. Or be ballsy and bet buff in regulation
-
11-05-13 09:24 AM #16
I know Vegas is sprinkling some on that line today Originally Posted by Vegas39
-
11-05-13 09:25 AM #17
Originally Posted by Russian Rocket
Dan Boyle believes they lost against Phx. He said it felt good getting back to playing but went on to say "It's unfortunate we got the loss. We probably deserved better."
AP Sports wrote today:
A visit from the lowly Buffalo Sabres might provide the San Jose Sharks with a good opportunity to end their minor rough patch.
They'll look to avoid a third straight loss while trying to halt their recent struggles against the Sabres by handing them a fifth consecutive defeat Tuesday night
-
11-05-13 09:25 AM #18
tempting since as Sammy said your boys were dominated last 2 games Originally Posted by Russian Rocket
I know Vegas is sprinkling some on that line today
-
11-05-13 09:28 AM #19
Originally Posted by VegasInsider
maybe the best option... other than the Total
-
11-05-13 09:31 AM #20
which side of total is better Originally Posted by Sam Odom
-
11-05-13 09:31 AM #21
"It's unfortunate we got the loss. We probably deserved better." ---they deserved better because they were dominating that game Originally Posted by Sam Odom
-- good luck with your hockey bets if you base them off of AP Sports articles
-
11-05-13 09:34 AM #22
Vegas take Buffalo under 1.5 Originally Posted by Vegas39
which side of total is better
-
11-05-13 09:34 AM #23
Originally Posted by Vegas39
which side of total is better
If Sammy had to choose... Take the + and go Ov 5 1/2
-
11-05-13 09:34 AM #24
Sharks TT O3.5 (+110) looks juicy, if you think the -400 is really warranted
-
11-05-13 09:42 AM #25
Originally Posted by Russian Rocket
You seem to be confused...
You said losing a game in OT/SO really isnt losing psychologically
Sammy used being 0-2 as a motivational edge (ranked 3rd) for SJ to WIN tonight.
Simple as that
-
11-05-13 09:44 AM #26
Sabres+1.5 @+106 is the bet here
-
11-05-13 09:45 AM #27
Originally Posted by Sam Odom
It it isn't the same. Team still gets a point.
Just hope playoff time San Jose shows up
-
11-05-13 09:45 AM #28
Don't twist this shit Sammy Originally Posted by Sam Odom
your original post:
#3. SJ are 0-2 last two (losing 3 in a row !?) -- that's you're talking about SJ winning tonight? give me a fukking break here
-
11-05-13 09:50 AM #29
Originally Posted by Russian Rocket
Yes... No other way to read post #5 otherwise... Sammy was making the case for SJ being -415
Rocket... You went off on a tangent then got lost in the weeds
-
11-05-13 09:53 AM #30
The most retarded reply Rocket read the entire day. Originally Posted by Sam Odom
Yes... No other way to read post #5 otherwise... Sammy was making the case for SJ being -415
Rocket... You went off on a tangent then got lost in the weeds
Rocket wishes you luck with your hockey betting this year!
-
11-05-13 09:57 AM #31
that only means jay Vegas and seaweed haven't posted today Originally Posted by Russian Rocket
-
11-05-13 09:59 AM #32
Rocket one word: Interrobang
-
11-05-13 10:03 AM #33
no bet for me..............
-
11-05-13 10:06 AM #34
Originally Posted by Vegas39
that only means jay Vegas and seaweed haven't posted today
-
11-05-13 10:11 AM #35
I'm glad you brought this up - you obviously don't know when to use a fukking interrobang Originally Posted by Sam Odom
Reply With Quote
