This fukkin guy
Jerrys reaction
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
11-03-13 02:48 PM #71
-
11-03-13 02:49 PM #72Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
Become A Pro!
Join Date: 11-13-12Posts: 5,179Betpoints: 1897
Game over Cowboys.
congratulations, you just lost to the bum ass VIKINGS!
-
11-03-13 02:49 PM #73
romo is gay bitch of the homosexuality
-
11-03-13 02:51 PM #74
I love betting against tony romo lol
-
11-03-13 02:54 PM #75
Here's the drive Tony...
-
11-03-13 02:55 PM #76
I never understand how witten gets so wide open all the time lol
-
11-03-13 02:58 PM #77Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
Join Date: 11-13-12Posts: 5,179Betpoints: 1897
Now manage that fukking clock, Tony!
-
11-03-13 02:59 PM #78Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
Join Date: 11-13-12Posts: 5,179Betpoints: 1897
Manage that fukking clock, Tony!
-
11-03-13 03:02 PM #79
Typical Cowboy drama
-
11-03-13 03:04 PM #80
I'll never understand how in the final two minutes of games, teams score at will. Where was that the other 3.8 quarters?
-
11-03-13 03:05 PM #81
romo make the hero. is nice.
is not the gay bitch of homesxual suck on penises!
so much nice the romo!
-
11-03-13 03:06 PM #82
Love the person doing the score clock. Let that time keep ticking. He has done it multiple times too
-
11-03-13 03:07 PM #83
Defenses get tired
Originally Posted by The Kraken
-
11-03-13 03:08 PM #84
No teams play no defense
Should play tight D like the other 58 minutes of game
-
11-03-13 03:12 PM #85
Didn't cash, but a great call nonetheless.
Very well could (and should) have.
-
11-03-13 03:13 PM #86
easy win for the cowboys lol
-
11-03-13 03:13 PM #87
Poor conditioning? That was very predictable. Originally Posted by pavyracer
-
11-03-13 03:13 PM #88
-
11-03-13 03:19 PM #89
It more has to do with the hurry up offense inside the 2 min. They can't sub players to match the offense's personnel and end up having the wrong players to defend a certain play. Originally Posted by The Kraken
-
11-03-13 03:25 PM #90
-
11-03-13 03:49 PM #91
Great call slick Originally Posted by dink
-
11-03-13 03:52 PM #92
But he makes more money than you and gets laid on demand. Originally Posted by Sarunas
How you doin'?
-
11-03-13 03:52 PM #93
Actually it was. He had a +400 dog leading with two minutes left and 85 yards of turf to defend. I'd take that every day of the week and twice on Sundays if given the opportunity. Originally Posted by stevenash
-
11-03-13 03:55 PM #94
The OP had no reasoning as to why Dallas would lose, and here's the most important part, Dallas did not lose. Originally Posted by No coincidences
I love ya Coin, but if my Aunt Mary has a pair of nuts she'd be my Uncle Charlie.
-
11-03-13 03:57 PM #95
I give credit where credit is due. Originally Posted by stevenash
This wasn't a Deemer hit, where he lucked out on a PK. This guy called a +400 dog that very easily could have won. In the long run, that's why this guy probably wins and we all know how much Deem loses.
-
11-03-13 04:08 PM #96
Bottom line, Dallas Cowboys WIN> dink posts sux anus.
-
11-03-13 05:06 PM #97
Dallas got lucky
Smart people played vikings at the +
The wise knew what to do
-
11-03-13 05:26 PM #98
Originally Posted by bubblebuttluv
Very nice call, YFI.
-
11-03-13 05:28 PM #99
The wise didn't listen to your BS post and imbisicle prediction. Originally Posted by dink
How will your Vikes do next week dink, against the Bravehearts?
-
11-03-13 06:31 PM #100
How was it an imbecile prediction? Try telling me that at any stage during the game you didn't think Vikings had this won? Originally Posted by Petey Wheatstraw
You're a fukkin moron!
I don't follow Vikings and haven't thought about next week you idiot!
-
11-04-13 05:41 AM #101
I would have gave the pick much more respect as to why Dallas would lose. Originally Posted by dink
Shake it off, the play fell short.
-
11-04-13 08:32 AM #102
lol this is such terrible logic and you do it all the time in MLB too. Originally Posted by No coincidences
IF I CAN GET THE ASTROS, A +250 UNDERDOG IN A TIE GAME IN THE 7TH INNING I'D TAKE THAT EVERYDAY.
That is you in a nutshell.
-
11-04-13 09:58 AM #103
It's really sad to see how many people still don't get it after the fact.
Doesn't surprise me though. Classic SBR in this thread.
-
11-04-13 11:24 AM #104
I know what you are saying, it looked like a good value play going in, but it was what it was, a good value that fell short. Originally Posted by No coincidences
The riddle of the day is this:
Is there value in a value play if the value play doesn't win?
-
11-04-13 11:39 AM #105
Long-term? Absolutely. Unfortunately, most of this board just doesn't get it. Originally Posted by stevenash
It's the same fools who got away with throwing Seattle into a ML parlay yesterday. They win and then forget about how stupid it was to do so, so they repeat the pattern. That's why most bettors can't sustain long term -- or even come close.
Reply With Quote
