Guys why the love for Seattle here???
Yeah their defense is tight but the Rams play them tight (as last year proved), plus its a division game. Another reason why this stays closer than a lot of people think...
GL
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
10-28-13 05:52 PM #36
Nomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: No coincidences
-
10-28-13 05:56 PM #37
Uhhh--- negative to all that..not going to be close--- AT ALL
Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
10-28-13 06:00 PM #38
Over here for sure.... it's been the play lately (look at the scoreboard from yesterday). If the books set this line to where they think the game will be it would probably be around 47. Overs have been killing it lately but the public won't catch on. Books set the lines to get equal $$ on each side.... not where they think the game will actually be.
I'm thinking it's going to be a Seattle blowout.... as in 14-0 half way through the first qtr. It just depends if they will keep their foot on the gas.
-
10-28-13 06:02 PM #39
Hell..id give you 17 pts to take the Rams....and tell you the game goes OVER 49pts...thats my pic and Im sticking to it!!
-
10-28-13 06:02 PM #40
Ok wheres the motivation for the Seahawks to keep their foot on the gas for a full 4 quarters here?? Originally Posted by cutter341975
This line screams backdoor cover imo...
-
10-28-13 06:04 PM #41
[QUOTE=LT Profits;20062056]I have no interest in laying double-digits on the road in the NFL, but I do like the ‘under’ here because the Seahawks will be the only team doing much scoring. It seems to me the Rams are throwing Clemens to the wolves here vs. the ferocious Seattle defense, and St. Louis lacks the running game to slow down the pass rush. Now Seattle should score, but I don’t think they will score SO many points to prevent an ‘under’. Seattle is still very conservative offensively averaging the second fewest pass attempts in the NFL, as the only reason they are averaging 27 points is because the defense keeps giving the offense short fields. Look for lots of running by Lynch to take time off the clock.
Will there be a Brett Favre sighting? Nah,LOL LOL!!!!! but desperate St. Louis did put in a call to the 44-year-old future Hall of Famer, supposedly in jest,after losing Sam Bradford for the season. In lieu of Favre, the team will go with journeyman Kellen Clemens. They also signed Brady Quinn and Austin Davis as insurance plans, using the term liberally. Seahawks wined this NFC West foe, winning 14 of the past 16, and the ’Hawks are roaring now. So many things are going right, and dynamic WR Percy Harvin (hip surgery) is close to making his Seattle debut, though it won’t be here. Marshawn Lynch has three straight 100-yard games vs. St. Louis.
***My Prediction***: Using my Formula and Analysis plus The Linemakers & Sporting News [have no association with illegal gambling,or offshore betting, Seahawks, -13 ... 28-0 in a blowout or more.... Don’t despair,SBR sports fans,World Series Game 5 is tonight, also in St. Louis. LOL LOL!!
-
10-28-13 06:06 PM #42
Falcons beat Rams
Cardinals beat Falcons
Seahawks beat Cardinals
hence
Seahawks beat Rams
This is Gambling 101 for you newbies.
-
10-28-13 06:08 PM #43
Bc they think this is their year...they wanna show up the Saints soo bad...pride/arrogance...thats y. Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
10-28-13 06:18 PM #44
You have to dodge too many unpredictability just to survive an under bet, better off not even betting it. The Broncos game was well on pace to go under somehow went high. The Cowboys also was well on it's way to go under, still went high. Under are just bad bets in my book, unless you betting Hockey, Basketball, or Baseball.
-
10-28-13 06:28 PM #45
Like every other team doesn't believe that in themselves?? Why would they go out to play if they didn't believe it was 'their year'?? Originally Posted by cutter341975
That's a flawed logic pal, far from significant and makes me feel more confident in Taking the rams if anything...
GL either way...
-
10-28-13 06:40 PM #46
Under 21.5 1st half +105
Rams scoreless 1st half, while Seahawks scores 17 points max
-
10-28-13 06:40 PM #47
well..donate then..just donate..yeh..take the Rams u screwball. Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
10-28-13 06:44 PM #48
Hard to believe in yourself and team when you CANT have a winning season..you dummy--- Rams just playing to earn their salary bow..I mean why get hurt?? Why even try??... 90% of any losing team..just wants their pay. Thats y they wont play hard..check out that logic..dummy
-
10-28-13 06:48 PM #49
I couldn't agree more. You hit on every key point to this game. It's the under or nothing for me. I too hate laying double digits on the road in the NFL. Just not a high percentage play IMO. Best of luck to you tonight LT!
-
10-28-13 06:51 PM #50
last year is last year pal. Originally Posted by ACoochy
last year, they almost beat sf.
look what happened this year.
-
10-28-13 06:54 PM #51
2 dummies agreeing...lol...neither of you will bet a cent either way. Originally Posted by BroncosBettor
-
10-28-13 06:54 PM #52
Fixed. Originally Posted by Ghenghis Kahn
-
10-28-13 06:58 PM #53
U posting another loser huh LT!!! Originally Posted by LT Profits
Fixed.
-
10-28-13 06:58 PM #54
LOL Originally Posted by cutter341975
Go look at my spreadsheet junior if you wanna know why I say what I say...
You think I talk to waste my breathe??
This is a fukkin business pal, treat it as such junior...
-
10-28-13 07:05 PM #55
ok..u old ass fart...ill wipe my butt with your spreadsheet..and ERASE your bankroll if you ever even tried to get serious about betting against me...enjoy the game and remember lights out at 10pm at the Rest Home.. Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
10-28-13 07:08 PM #56
Originally Posted by cutter341975
Kid wins a few games and all of a sudden thinks he's the next Billy fukkin Walters...
Kid go back to the noob forum and post up at least 500 posts before coming here and talking smack to guys that don't just throw darts...
-
10-28-13 07:08 PM #57
seawhores and over
-
10-28-13 07:12 PM #58
Sure the past could be a indicator for future results but Rams aren't THAT bad offensively (aka not Jags bad)... Originally Posted by Ghenghis Kahn
If this wasn't a divison game then yes id be all over the Hawks...
Predicting Rams score at least 2 TD's and 2 FG's here once Seahawks defense tapers off towards the end...GL
Havent read a single reason (that makes sense) as to why Seahawks come out 100% firing here...
-
10-28-13 07:12 PM #59
Go change your Depends..and clean your dentures. Ohh..isnt it spongebath day..their at the Rest Home?...38-17..Seahawks...write that down on your Bingo Pad..Grandpa Originally Posted by ACoochy
Kid wins a few games and all of a sudden thinks he's the next Billy fukkin Walters...
Kid go back to the noob forum and post up at least 500 posts before coming here and talking smack to guys that don't just throw darts...
-
10-28-13 07:18 PM #60
Haha make sure you don't spend that whole $20 your parents give you as weekly allowance on the 1 game now... Originally Posted by cutter341975
Gotta spread out those $5 bets remember??
And yes im in my early 30's and wearing depends you fukkin hamburger...
-
10-28-13 07:18 PM #61
Cutter consider a psychiatrist
-
10-28-13 07:21 PM #62
I put 1k on the Over and 2.5k..on the Seahawks to cover...MONEY LONG! Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
10-28-13 07:22 PM #63
i have..and tha shrink gets his NFL picks from Big Daddy cutter. Originally Posted by onacloud
-
10-28-13 07:23 PM #64
you're saying they score 20 points with their backup qb? Originally Posted by ACoochy
i say they score 13 max.
-
10-28-13 07:23 PM #65
2 words for me: Kellen Clemons Originally Posted by ACoochy
Also like the under.
-
10-28-13 07:24 PM #66
money long like Shaqs feet boy! Originally Posted by cutter341975
-
10-28-13 07:25 PM #67
38-17..Seahawks--- remember ole cutter said it..before u saw it!!
-
10-28-13 07:32 PM #68
Im saying the seattle defense wont want to risk injury once they've built a solid lead (presuming they even show up aka broncos for 1st 3 quarters last night) and this is where the majority of Rams points will come from because what do seattle have to prove otherwise in this spot??. Originally Posted by Ghenghis Kahn
Seahawks have form in allowing garbage time TD's and FG's and can see rams taking advantage of this is all...GL
-
10-28-13 07:34 PM #69
No Bradford for this game. Originally Posted by onacloud
-
10-28-13 07:35 PM #70
38-17..Seahawks grandpa Originally Posted by ACoochy
Reply With Quote
