1. 10-06-13 12:50 AM #36
    El Nino
    October 2014 POTM
    El Nino's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-03-12
    Posts: 18,426
    Betpoints: 1868

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    Oh, did you lose? You should have gotten it back with a clever in-game when Washington was +9.5 and huge + money.
    Lol, no. Just fukkin' up my middle.
    Nomination(s):
    This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: The Giant
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote 1
  2. 10-06-13 12:50 AM #37
    Vegas39
    Vegas39's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-22-11
    Posts: 30,686
    Betpoints: 214

    Wow
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-06-13 12:50 AM #38
    MoneyLineDawg
    Update your status
    MoneyLineDawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 13,253
    Betpoints: 13

    Wow complete bullshit right there.....How do you overturn that
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-06-13 12:51 AM #39
    Ernie Mccracken
    Ernie Mccracken's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-11-11
    Posts: 1,986
    Betpoints: 4304

    Bad call
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-06-13 12:51 AM #40
    747planes
    [Too Long]
    747planes's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-25-13
    Posts: 658
    Betpoints: 334

    lol there u go.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-06-13 12:51 AM #41
    Darkside Magick
    Black Box Algorithm
    Darkside Magick's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-28-10
    Posts: 12,586
    Betpoints: 1258

    Garbage
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-06-13 12:51 AM #42
    Ra77er
    Ra77er's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-11
    Posts: 10,969
    Betpoints: 0

    I'm assuming they tapped into NASA satellites to see that
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-06-13 12:52 AM #43
    El Nino
    October 2014 POTM
    El Nino's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-03-12
    Posts: 18,426
    Betpoints: 1868

    Of all the video reviews...THAT was conclusive, indisputable visual evidence???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-06-13 12:53 AM #44
    winz
    refuse to lose
    winz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-12
    Posts: 537
    Betpoints: 949

    these crooks do whatever they want and get away with it every time so thats that.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-06-13 12:53 AM #45
    teaserpleaser
    teaserpleaser's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-14-08
    Posts: 26,016
    Betpoints: 0

    another great day of college football.... Today was fun
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-06-13 12:53 AM #46
    ChalkyDog
    Buy the ticket, take the ride.
    ChalkyDog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-02-11
    Posts: 9,598
    Betpoints: 13

    Rest of the country is sleeping as the best football is played.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-06-13 12:54 AM #47
    Wilfred
    Wilfred's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-19-12
    Posts: 1,908
    Betpoints: 528

    I think it hit the ground, but I don't see you can say that was conclusive enough to overturn the call on the field.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-06-13 12:54 AM #48
    sneakerhead
    I NEED MONEY
    sneakerhead's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-14-10
    Posts: 7,727
    Betpoints: 1417

    Quote Originally Posted by winz View Post
    these crooks do whatever they want and get away with it every time so thats that.
    You gotta be blind or on a black and white 21" tv to not see the ball touch the ground from the angle they showed. That was enough evidence to overturn it in my opinion
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-06-13 12:54 AM #49
    El Nino
    October 2014 POTM
    El Nino's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-03-12
    Posts: 18,426
    Betpoints: 1868

    Really wanted to see OT there. You could infer that it was trapped, but zero evidence proving it. Shame.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-06-13 12:55 AM #50
    ChalkyDog
    Buy the ticket, take the ride.
    ChalkyDog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-02-11
    Posts: 9,598
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    I think it hit the ground, but I don't see you can say that was conclusive enough to overturn the call on the field.
    It was a terrible call on the field.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-06-13 12:55 AM #51
    MoneyLineDawg
    Update your status
    MoneyLineDawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 13,253
    Betpoints: 13

    I literally can't stand replay reviews anymore.....They fukk it up half the time, overturn calls where this no "indisputable evidence", etc.....Just a disaster

    I don't know what the answer is but this ain't it......

    So fukkin inconsistent
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 10-06-13 12:55 AM #52
    BigDeem5
    2013-2016 NBA: 461-378-24 +52.65u
    BigDeem5's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-26-11
    Posts: 17,190
    Betpoints: 2158

    Wash 2h ml n spread, bang
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 10-06-13 12:56 AM #53
    MoneyLineDawg
    Update your status
    MoneyLineDawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 13,253
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by sneakerhead View Post
    You gotta be blind or on a black and white 21" tv to not see the ball touch the ground from the angle they showed. That was enough evidence to overturn it in my opinion
    It hit the ground in a split second, but from what I understand, the ball can touch the ground as long as it doesn't aid the catch if that makes any sense

    Call should have stood whether called incomplete or complete on the field....My issue is with overturning the call with the replays given
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 10-06-13 12:58 AM #54
    ChalkyDog
    Buy the ticket, take the ride.
    ChalkyDog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-02-11
    Posts: 9,598
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyLineDawg View Post
    It hit the ground in a split second, but from what I can tell, the ball can touch the ground as long as it doesn't aid the catch if that makes any sense
    No idea what angles were going on in that.

    However, I found it odd that the call of the game wasn't being replayed and chopped up and zoomed in on from every angle the booth had - like they do every single time with every single one of these.

    Instead, they showed the play twice. A third after the official call. The rest of the time was panning on players.

    No idea what it all means? Double Rainbows? But, I found it odd.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 10-06-13 12:59 AM #55
    winz
    refuse to lose
    winz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-12
    Posts: 537
    Betpoints: 949

    lol.. yea it looked like it hit the ground but im still surprised they overturned the call on the field..my point was that they could have easily left it alone with no consequences if they chose to do so.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 10-06-13 01:02 AM #56
    ChalkyDog
    Buy the ticket, take the ride.
    ChalkyDog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-02-11
    Posts: 9,598
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by winz View Post
    lol.. yea it looked like it hit the ground but im still surprised they overturned the call on the field..my point was that they could have easily left it alone with no consequences if they chose to do so.
    Ruling a failed catch to be good, is equally bad, except the teams celebrating switch.

    Catch the fukkin' ball.

    Refs got it right. What people are arguing is technicalities.

    "Even though I don't think it was a catch, since it was ruled a catch, the angles we saw of the play is inconclusive, even though I don't think it was a catch - we should rule it a catch."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 10-06-13 01:03 AM #57
    bubblebuttluv
    Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
    bubblebuttluv's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-12
    Posts: 5,179
    Betpoints: 1897

    The ball clearly flew through his hands and was on the ground under his body. If I knew how to post gifs of shit that happened two seconds ago like some of the computer wizards on here, I could give a video breakdown. I know it can be hard to sometimes distinguish between football and black skin.

    The ESPN announcers were douchebags. They wanted SO BAD for Stanford to lose since they suck Oregon's dick SO hard (Oregon will beat Stanford anyways though, this won't be like last year).

    The refs absolutely got it right and ESPN people were just being the typical biased, idiotic ESPN people.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 10-06-13 01:04 AM #58
    MoneyLineDawg
    Update your status
    MoneyLineDawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 13,253
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by ChalkyDog View Post
    No idea what angles were going on in that.

    However, I found it odd that the call of the game wasn't being replayed and chopped up and zoomed in on from every angle the booth had - like they do every single time with every single one of these.

    Instead, they showed the play twice. A third after the official call. The rest of the time was panning on players.

    No idea what it all means? Double Rainbows? But, I found it odd.
    I agree it was weird.....That review decided the game and even the announcers were kinda just acting like it was a standard play with little consequence

    I think the rule on catches like that is that the ball can touch the ground as long as the receiver has control when it comes in contact with the ground.....Now maybe for a split second the WR did not have control when it hit the ground, but how the fukk you overturning that in that spot with those replays that we saw?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 10-06-13 01:06 AM #59
    bubblebuttluv
    Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
    bubblebuttluv's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-12
    Posts: 5,179
    Betpoints: 1897

    Quote Originally Posted by sneakerhead View Post
    You gotta be blind or on a black and white 21" tv to not see the ball touch the ground from the angle they showed. That was enough evidence to overturn it in my opinion
    This.

    It CLEARLY hit the ground.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 10-06-13 01:07 AM #60
    bubblebuttluv
    Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
    bubblebuttluv's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-12
    Posts: 5,179
    Betpoints: 1897

    We will reference this thread again when the play comes on youtube or some shit.

    The point is Stanford could have been robbed from some bullshit.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  26. 10-06-13 01:10 AM #61
    MoneyLineDawg
    Update your status
    MoneyLineDawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 13,253
    Betpoints: 13

    I just went back on DVR.....I think the ball went through his hands and hit the ground and popped back up, all in less than a second......The problem was the replays given gave terrible angles it's hard to see even in slow motion

    Just so you guys know though, the ball is allowed to touch the ground IF the player has control when the ball comes in contact with the ground......This play here wasn't the case, but for the future, Ground doesn't always = incomplete
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  27. 10-06-13 01:13 AM #62
    Ra77er
    Ra77er's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-11
    Posts: 10,969
    Betpoints: 0

    My RCA with tin foil rabbit ears didn't see shit. They showed the replay from behind like 2 or 3 times and I couldn't see the ball very clearly. Looked like a trap but they ruled a catch so I assumed it had to be solid evidence to overturn. Maybe I should upgrade my TV.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  28. 10-06-13 01:16 AM #63
    MoneyLineDawg
    Update your status
    MoneyLineDawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 13,253
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by Ra77er View Post
    My RCA with tin foil rabbit ears didn't see shit. They showed the replay from behind like 2 or 3 times and I couldn't see the ball very clearly. Looked like a trap but they ruled a catch so I assumed it had to be solid evidence to overturn. Maybe I should upgrade my TV.
    You can't see the ball clearly on any of the replays, I'm watching them all right now on a brand new 70 inch HD......ball looks like it goes through his hands and pops up to his arms, but his right arm is underneath the ball, just hard to say he had control when the ball initially went through his arms and "probably" hit the ground

    Alright I need to quit this shit, I'm high as fukk and rambling about shit that doesn't matter
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  29. 10-06-13 01:19 AM #64
    bubblebuttluv
    Derek Jeter, the best shortstop ever.
    bubblebuttluv's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-12
    Posts: 5,179
    Betpoints: 1897

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyLineDawg View Post
    I just went back on DVR.....I think the ball went through his hands and hit the ground and popped back up, all in less than a second......The problem was the replays given gave terrible angles it's hard to see even in slow motion

    Just so you guys know though, the ball is allowed to touch the ground IF the player has control when the ball comes in contact with the ground......This play here wasn't the case, but for the future, Ground doesn't always = incomplete
    I'm glad you saw it to, bruh.

    You good pples.

    For everyone else, when the receiver dove down to the ground the ball flew through the space in between his hands and his chest. The ball landed under his body when the receiver hit the ground, and was trapped there. At best for the receiver, the end of the ball touched the guys fukking wrists after it was already trapped on the ground. clearly not a complete pass. Now of course being a receiver, he snatched that shit up real quick off the ground to try and fool the refs.

    Like I said, it would have been a robbery if they called it complete.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  30. 10-06-13 01:23 AM #65
    ChalkyDog
    Buy the ticket, take the ride.
    ChalkyDog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-02-11
    Posts: 9,598
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by Ra77er View Post
    My RCA with tin foil rabbit ears didn't see shit. They showed the replay from behind like 2 or 3 times and I couldn't see the ball very clearly. Looked like a trap but they ruled a catch so I assumed it had to be solid evidence to overturn. Maybe I should upgrade my TV.


    Always.

    New tvs are real nice.

    65 is the new 50
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
First 12
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »