This is a classic case of diminishing the family of importance........
<dt style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">
FAMILIES TO DIMINISH IN IMPORTANCE</dt><dt style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"></dt><dt style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Families would be limited in size. We already alluded to not being allowed more than two children. Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. Most people who marry will marry more than once. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common - nobody would even ask questions about it. It would be widely accepted as no different from married people being together.
More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies.
The extended families would be smaller, and more remote. Travel would be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to travel would feel they could get back to their families, not that they were abruptly being made remote from their families. But one of the net effects of easier divorce laws combined with the promotion of travel, and transferring families from one city to another, was to create instability in the families.
If both husband and wife are working and one partner is transferred, the other one may not be easily transferred. Soon, either gives up his or her job and stays behind while the other leaves, or else gives up the job and risks not finding employment in the new location. Rather a diabolical approach to this whole thing!
New World System structuring exposed in 1969!</dt>