Is overtime fair to unders players

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • newb411breaker19
    SBR Sharp
    • 08-21-05
    • 421

    #1
    Is overtime fair to unders players
    I hate that rule but I guess its just part of the game. A week ago I got a game that went into overtime for me and picked the over and got lucky. Tonight Donyell Marshall has to hit a three for cleveland to put into ot, i hate those. WHat's everyone's opinion on this.

    My opinion is mixed but I'm more against it because i'm an under player. In baseball they give the home team better odds on the runline because they may not get another chance to bat. Shouldn't under players get some sort of break. my opinion is probably pretty wrong though
  • kdmfox
    SBR MVP
    • 08-11-05
    • 1743

    #2
    An overtime is always the kiss if you have the under ... I've survived a few when I had the under but not many ... Is it fair? ... Hell no, but ot is part of the 2nd half ... It probably makes sense to grade the race, in fairness, when regulation ends, but side players would want the same thing if they had the dog ... I played a college football game once and had the under and there was 35 points in ot ... A special day.
    Comment
    • Quarm
      SBR Sharp
      • 10-03-05
      • 313

      #3
      it is fair, because if overtimes wouldnt count the odds would be different...
      Comment
      • onlooker
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 08-10-05
        • 36572

        #4
        Originally posted by Quarm
        it is fair, because if overtimes wouldnt count the odds would be different...
        Yep, the totals would probably be a bit smaller if they didnt count OT. So to me, it is fair.
        Comment
        • Illusion
          Restricted User
          • 08-09-05
          • 25166

          #5
          I hate losing an under bet in overtime, but the rules are fair im my opinion.
          Comment
          • onlooker
            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
            • 08-10-05
            • 36572

            #6
            Originally posted by Illusion
            I hate losing an under bet in overtime, but the rules are fair im my opinion.
            Well I hate losing period in OT.
            When you have two good dogs, on the same day, that lose in OT. That really hurts.
            Comment
            • Senator7
              SBR MVP
              • 08-20-05
              • 1559

              #7
              Is overtime fair to bettors who play sides? Regardless of whether or not its fair, it seems to be a necessary evil.
              Comment
              • Dead Money
                SBR Wise Guy
                • 08-30-05
                • 706

                #8
                10 guys sayin' "shit" the game is going to OT

                10 other guys doing cartwheels in there livingroom cause the had the over.


                Of course it's fair

                IMO
                Comment
                • freebie
                  SBR MVP
                  • 08-10-05
                  • 1174

                  #9
                  If you think it's unfair, why not just buy every game Over. This way you wouldn't be piss if it did go into OverTime.
                  Comment
                  • adriano
                    SBR MVP
                    • 11-10-05
                    • 1081

                    #10
                    don't expect totals to be much different if overtime does not count, it is just a clever trick by the bookies
                    Last edited by adriano; 11-14-05, 12:35 AM.
                    Comment
                    • Betman
                      SBR Sharp
                      • 10-20-05
                      • 300

                      #11
                      Screw the under.

                      Talk about sweating for a couple of hours. It isn't over (no pun intended) until the last second of the game.

                      Nothing like an over that covers at halftime and you just know you won no matter what. That is what I call a Julius Cesar moment
                      Comment
                      • Bill Dozer
                        www.twitter.com/BillDozer
                        • 07-12-05
                        • 10894

                        #12
                        OT is definitely a factor, especially for halftime bettors.
                        Comment
                        • bigboydan
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 08-10-05
                          • 55420

                          #13
                          Originally posted by onlòóker
                          Well I hate losing period in OT.
                          When you have two good dogs, on the same day, that lose in OT. That really hurts.

                          don't feel bad, i had the bobcats and bulls that night too
                          Comment
                          • Max Levine
                            SBR Wise Guy
                            • 10-12-05
                            • 614

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Bill Dozer
                            OT is definitely a factor, especially for halftime bettors.
                            Books are confused about OT. They include it in 2nd half wagers in BB and Football (which, IMO, they shouldn't as OT is not more a part of 2nd half as it is a part of 1st half) but exclude it in 3rd period hockey bets. IMO, they got it right in hockey; the half/period ends at the sound of the buzzer. If they were to do the same in basket and football, they could offer lines for OT. Or do they? Not much time to put them up but hey! we're fast! lol

                            Max
                            Comment
                            SBR Contests
                            Collapse
                            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                            Collapse
                            Working...