1. 03-18-13 11:22 PM #1
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    What happened to the empty net goal in hockey???

    I cant seem to catch an empty net goal to save my life lately! I love betting the puckline of -1.5 or -2.5, but when i win it is never on an empty net goal.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-18-13 11:26 PM #2
    onlooker
    I'm still watching...
    onlooker's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 36,572
    Betpoints: 4627

    Empty netters always seem to screw my unders.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-19-13 02:05 AM #3
    Dillonious Monk
    Dillonious Monk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-25-12
    Posts: 292
    Betpoints: 3839

    I got one with 3 seconds left to cash a +660 TB -1.5/Kings -1 parlay today. But I tried a bunch of other correlations like that and some came up short so I was barely in the green for the day. If Dallas would have won by 2 I would have cashed a Rangers ML/Dallas -1 1/2 at +454...sucks cause they were up 3-0 early.

    Kings have been money to win by more than 1 at home, though...but for some reason I always play them -1. I guess it's cause it's almost a fact that they will win by at least one lately and there's seemingly no chance of losing with a -1 lol
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-19-13 03:38 AM #4
    NittanyLionsFan
    Casey, show 'em how to smile.
    NittanyLionsFan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-26-10
    Posts: 2,857
    Betpoints: 438

    Tampa Bay had an empty net goal today that would have covered a -1.5 spread.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-19-13 05:05 AM #5
    ChicagoBlackhawk
    ChicagoBlackhawk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-13
    Posts: 518
    Betpoints: 160

    Quote Originally Posted by NittanyLionsFan View Post
    Tampa Bay had an empty net goal today that would have covered a -1.5 spread.

    and if you actually watched hockey you would know Anaheim also had a empty net to cover the spread. lol you dont watch too bad huh. keep posting locks tho
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 03-19-13 05:16 AM #6
    You mad bro
    You mad bro's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-15-12
    Posts: 16,641
    Betpoints: -23

    Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoBlackhawk View Post
    and if you actually watched hockey you would know Anaheim also had a empty net to cover the spread. lol you dont watch too bad huh. keep posting locks tho
    hes a kid leave him alone...might rat you out to his parents
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 03-19-13 08:50 PM #7
    Rich Boy
    Rich Boy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-01-09
    Posts: 9,713
    Betpoints: 1106

    Empty netters happen roughly 30% of the time in 1 goal games
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 03-19-13 09:08 PM #8
    ThaWoj
    hope i dont wake up tomorrow
    ThaWoj's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-09-10
    Posts: 6,260
    Betpoints: 3427

    Quote Originally Posted by Dillonious Monk View Post
    I got one with 3 seconds left to cash a +660 TB -1.5/Kings -1 parlay today. But I tried a bunch of other correlations like that and some came up short so I was barely in the green for the day. If Dallas would have won by 2 I would have cashed a Rangers ML/Dallas -1 1/2 at +454...sucks cause they were up 3-0 early.

    Kings have been money to win by more than 1 at home, though...but for some reason I always play them -1. I guess it's cause it's almost a fact that they will win by at least one lately and there's seemingly no chance of losing with a -1 lol
    of course the one time i played them 2 weeks ago they get beat up at home by dallas. Killed a 3 team -1.5 ticket. But yeah normally theyre money at home.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »