[stevenash]

This game is better and bigger than UConn v. Stanford.

Coach Geno and the Husky dynasty versus the great beast, Britney Griner and the rest of the lady Bears.

If you like basketball, you can appreciate this women's match up, it is as good as it gets.
5 future pros are playing in this game tonight.

How good is Baylor? +6 good over UConn in Connecticut.
UConn hasn't been a home dog in over a decade.

Baylor at Connecticut
Mon 2/18		905 Baylor - Women	-6 -120		o135½ -120
9:00PM		906 Connecticut - Women	+6 -120		u135½ -120

Take the under, Bears play incredible defense.
Huskies will not hang their usual 75 points on their opponent tonight.
Bears allow a stingy 52 points per game.

Under 135.5 for 2* for me

[Vinnie Paz]

Suprused I can't get this....all I see is Norfolk vs Hampton. Damn. Gonna call these fukks and demand a line!

[stevenash]

^
5 Dimes

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

Baylor Women are looking good again this year!

They have a feisty defense!

I like the under!!

[stevenash]

How influential is ESPN?



According to Baylor coach Kim Mulkey, the months of January and February represent the time to put yourself in prime position to win a conference championship. It is not necessarily the time to play a high-profile non-conference game on the road.

The top-ranked Lady Bears clinched at least a tie for the Big 12 championship with a win over TCU Saturday. They will look to clinch the title outright against Texas Feb. 23. In between, they will face No. 3 UConn at the XL Center Monday (9 p.m.; ESPN2).

The match-up with the Huskies will be the latest that Baylor has played a non-conference game during in 13 seasons under Mulkey. Had it not been for the urging of ESPN officials, this game might not have been scheduled at all.

“The timing of it. Going on the road. A two-and-a-half hour flight. Getting back at 3 or 4 o’clock in the morning. Just the timing of it,’’ Mulkey said. “But I agreed to it because it is good for women’s basketball. I don’t know (UConn coach) Geno (Auriemma’s) Big East schedule, but I know the timing of ours is that I don’t want anything to take away from us having an opportunity to clinch an outright championship the next game when we get back from UConn. Initially, I said, `No.’ And just had a lot of phone calls from television, ESPN people, to give me their push why we should and I agreed to do it.

“I think it goes against what you’re trying to do with your program. Our program, really selfishly, is the most important thing in January and February to try to get to the postseason and to win a conference championship. But yet, at the same time, you feel a sense of a responsibility to do what’s good for the women’s game and keep the fan interest there and I understand that too. Which one is more important to me? It’s going to be Baylor University. But we’ll go and we’ll give it our best shot and I’m sure they will too. It should be a fantastic game. I just don’t want people to overemphasize it.’’

The latest non-conference game under Mulkey had been an 88-57 loss at LSU Jan. 20, 2006. That was also televised on ESPN2.

Auriemma also does not see this game as being ideal at this point in the season. But playing a non-conference game in February is nothing new for the Huskies over the past few seasons.

UConn faced Oklahoma on Feb. 13, 14 and 15 over the past three seasons, respectively. The Huskies also faced LSU Feb. 25, 2008 and Feb. 11, 2007 and Texas Feb. 12, 2006.

“I think it’s good in the sense that you kind of get away from the conference games for a while,’’ Auriemma said. “It’s a game that really doesn’t affect your ability to win a championship. Every conference game has an impact on whether you win the Big East regular season championship or not. This game doesn’t. And I think any time you can do that, to just play a game that’s kind of a preview of the kind of game you hope to play in March I think it’s always good. Regardless of whether it’s January, February.

“It’s not ideal in the middle of February. I think by now you’d like to just kind of be in a rhythm. But I think it’s good for your younger guys to see this is what potentially it could look like in March. So in that respect I think it’s pretty good.’’

[Harmy G]

Any idea on the line movement? UConn was favored yesterday...

[stevenash]

Any idea on the line movement? UConn was favored yesterday...

And it was a pick at noon time.
I am trying to find out

This is the guy to follow though. (Rich Elliot Ct. Post)
This is his last update 1/2 hour ago.

http://blog.ctnews.com/elliott/2013/...ylor-at-uconn/

[Vinnie Paz]

On it nasher, und 135 2X

[mistermatt891]

i cant bet woman

doesnt feel right

[stevenash]

i cant bet woman

doesnt feel right

But it feels right when you **** them, right?

[Harmy G]

And it was a pick at noon time.
I am trying to find out

Probably just lack of volume in the sport in general. Low limits. Heck, pinnacle doesn't even have a line on the game. Do you know what limits 5dimes has on it?

[stevenash]

^
regular NCAA limits

[Emily_Haines]

Probably just lack of volume in the sport in general. Low limits. Heck, pinnacle doesn't even have a line on the game. Do you know what limits 5dimes has on it?

5dimes has a $100 max bet on college women plus you have to lay -120

[stevenash]

5dimes has a $100 max bet on college women plus you have to lay -120

Wrong again.
Yes you have to lay -120
No the max is not 100.

164154139-1

2/18/13 2:37pm

$360.00

$300.00

Pending

2/18/13 9:00pm College Women Basketball 905 Baylor - Women/Connecticut - Women Under 135½ -120*

[Emily_Haines]

Wrong again.
Yes you have to lay -120
No the max is not 100.

164154139-1

2/18/13 2:37pm

$360.00

$300.00

Pending

2/18/13 9:00pm College Women Basketball 905 Baylor - Women/Connecticut - Women Under 135½ -120*

You think I just make shit up like your fantasy job and make believe 130k salary?

One or more wagers were over your wager limit. These wager(s) have been lowered to your maximum allowed.

Wager
	2/18/2013 9:00 PM College Women Basketball 906 Connecticut - Women* +5 -120 vs Baylor - Women Risking $120.00 To Win $100.00

MAX BET IS $100

[Vinnie Paz]

Emily I guess Tony fears your action

[stevenash]

You think I just make shit up like your fantasy job and make believe 130k salary?

One or more wagers were over your wager limit. These wager(s) have been lowered to your maximum allowed.

Wager
	2/18/2013 9:00 PM College Women Basketball 906 Connecticut - Women* +5 -120 vs Baylor - Women Risking $120.00 To Win $100.00

MAX BET IS $100

Problem with your account dude.
My wager went it smoothly

[BigBoi]

Its not allowing my wager either.

[stevenash]

^
Mine went in

[BigBoi]

I see that. I like the under

[stevenash]

I see that. I like the under

Love the under

[mistermatt891]

game started but u can still bet it at 5dimes

went to bet the under and then flipped channels and saw like 3 mins went by already

[InTheDrink]

id think about watching this but beth mowins makes my ears bleed

[stevenash]

53 total points at the half.
(pending these end of the half free throws)

[mistermatt891]

53 total points at the half.
(pending these end of the half free throws)

55 cuz of that foul

[Bengals28]

No 2h lines?

[sportsguy04]

How's the under 138 looking?

[sportsguy04]

Never mind the under is toast, apparently defense is optional in the 2h.

[mistermatt891]

under is looking dead

last time i ever bet woman

[sportsguy04]

They have shot lights out 2h

[mistermatt891]

there on pace to score 100 penetrating points in the 2nd half alone

total bullshit

[TheMoneyShot]

Unreal the scoring in the 2H

[ThaTopMoron]

when you bet women, you bet the better team. that is all.

taking Baylor last year in the women's final was the easiest bet ever... even easier than Bama vs LSU or Kentucky beating Kansas... man college championships were easy last year.

[InTheDrink]

who won

[OMGRandyJackson]

When I saw this headline first thing that jumped to my mind was "WTF HOW DID I MISS THIS GAME!>! AND WHEN DID RANKINGS CHANGE TO THIS!!"

Then I clicked thread and saw it was womens and then saw the title NCAA W..

who won

No one, its womens sports.