[Sam Odom]

[nonohecantplay]

losing bet, pass

[Sam Odom]

losing bet, pass

Sammy thinks the line will keep climbing .... we'll see

[rm18]

MIght take LA Bickerstaff still the coach in that game he will probably go undefeated then Dantoni will start losing again

[Sam Odom]

MIght take LA Bickerstaff still the coach in that game

Key players not happy on Lakers - sammy will watch studiously

[Gonz312]

Doubt the bug that went through SA's lineup is completely gone and LA pounding bad teams isn't enough for me... I am staying away

[nonohecantplay]

lakers will win by double digits,

[rm18]

Key players not happy on Lakers - sammy will watch studiously

Who other than Gasol is not happy?

[Goat Milk]

Key players on LA overjoyed that Dantoni is taking over. Nash Howard Kobe all love the move. Bryant had a say in the move.

Parenthetically, stop referring to yourself in the third person. We have enough of those already at sbr.

[Sam Odom]

lakers will win by double digits,

wow

[Sam Odom]

Parenthetically, stop referring to yourself in the third person. .

Sammy will consider

[lakerboy]

Books like san an. PASS.

[Sam Odom]

LB , -2 1/2 tomorrow ?

[lakerboy]

I think it closes -2.

[vaas187]

no idea....

tbh goat is sharp with his NBA. i started hot and have been off the past few days. call it unlucky lol....under in the boston chicago game was a dud, went way over. denver lost....utah got lucky as penetrate.....jefferson does that 1 million times it never happens again

[wantitall4moi]

Lakers been a home dog to Spurs 8 times since 1999 theyre 1-7 SU and 1-7 ATS, safe to say they need to win to cover, but that is obvious since its a +1 line on them.

Like I always say only thing you need to know abut the NBA is fade lakers and bet on Spurs, when they are heads up it is obvious what to do. Heads up since 1999 Spurs are 38-28 ATS versus the Lakers considering how many rings lakers have won in that stretch that is an impressive record by the Spurs.

[vyomguy]

obviously pounding spurs here...line should be spurs -4.5 here.

[Goat Milk]

obviously pounding spurs here...line should be spurs -4.5 here.

uh no. Lakers don't get 5 points at home. I can't even remember the Lakers getting +5 at home when Kwame Brown and Smush Parker were in the starting lineup....maybe a couple times tops. This team will NEVER be +4.5 at home. ever.

[Lakers714]

Lakers been a home dog to Spurs 8 times since 1999 theyre 1-7 SU and 1-7 ATS, safe to say they need to win to cover, but that is obvious since its a +1 line on them.

Like I always say only thing you need to know abut the NBA is fade lakers and bet on Spurs, when they are heads up it is obvious what to do. Heads up since 1999 Spurs are 38-28 ATS versus the Lakers considering how many rings lakers have won in that stretch that is an impressive record by the Spurs.

Useless trend, please delete. Since 1999? R u fukin kidding me?

[Lakers714]

Line is interesting opening at Spurs -1. The Spurs had the last couple days off and the Lakers have blowout 2 bad teams under Bernie. I personally think they keep rolling playing pickup ball like they have been since Brown got fired.

[wantitall4moi]

Useless trend, please delete. Since 1999? R u fukin kidding me?

would you prefer since 2008? Then the Spurs are 7-7 and 8-6 ATS. Since 2010? Then Spurs are 4-3 SU and 4-3 ATS.

If you want to use the lakers at home then since 2008 theyre 3-3 SU and 3-3 ATS. Since 2010 theyre 1-2 Su and 1-2 ATS.

So it isnt a useless 'trend', SU winners covers, end of story. I just went back to 1998 to prove a point, it also got in some of the very good Laker teams and not these shit squads they have ben throwing out there the past few years.

[Lakers714]

would you prefer since 2008? Then the Spurs are 7-7 and 8-6 ATS. Since 2010? Then Spurs are 4-3 SU and 4-3 ATS.

If you want to use the lakers at home then since 2008 theyre 3-3 SU and 3-3 ATS. Since 2010 theyre 1-2 Su and 1-2 ATS.

So it isnt a useless 'trend', SU winners covers, end of story. I just went back to 1998 to prove a point, it also got in some of the very good Laker teams and not these shit squads they have ben throwing out there the past few years.

Yes, just as I thought, you're an idiot. Please delete.

So it went from 1-7 since 1999 to 7-7 since 2008. Lmfao. You're an idiot. Stop using these stupid ass trends. They're meaningless bro. We're the exact same players on those teams? No right? So if u see the roulette board that says its been black 15 times in a row, what r u gonna bet black again? My point is each game is independent. See what happened to your initial argument when u posted 1-7 since 1999 and then u changed to 7-7 since 2008. Don't look at trends from 1999 or 2008 or whatever, just cap the game.

[wantitall4moi]

Yes, just as I thought, you're an idiot. Please delete.

So it went from 1-7 since 1999 to 7-7 since 2008. Lmfao. You're an idiot. Stop using these stupid ass trends. They're meaningless bro. We're the exact same players on those teams? No right? So if u see the roulette board that says its been black 15 times in a row, what r u gonna bet black again? My point is each game is independent. See what happened to your initial argument when u posted 1-7 since 1999 and then u changed to 7-7 since 2008. Don't look at trends from 1999 or 2008 or whatever, just cap the game.

hey fucktard, one is a home dog, one is overall. Lakers as a home dog since 1999 are 1-7 Su and 1-7 ATS, and you can bet EVERY team they had on the floor (except for last years) was better than this one they have now. So I dont care who was playing or why. When theyre a home dog there is a reason, because trust me books know every penetrating clueless idiot like you who cant wait to piss money away on the lakers bets them when they are a dog, and twice as much when they are a home dog.

As far as 'capping he game', useless. because kobe is on the team, and you never know what he is gong to do. He might jack up 50 shots, you also dont know if he is going to be hot or not. You cant cap that. Nor can you handicap ron artest going 3-20 from the 3 point line, which is a distinct possibility.

capping the NBA is for suckers, you look at two teams you look at how books grade them and you go from there. Lakers always over rated even when theyre a dog. Spurs have been at least 3 point favs against everyone but the Clippers at Staples where they were the same -1 they are here. Last I checked Clippers were a much better team than the lakers at this point. But then again Clippers also blew out San Antonio that night as well.

Seriously this line should really be -4, but books are scared to put that number up because of the name on the jersey.

[ThaTopMoron]

1st half over

i love this bet in the NBA, like tonight in the heat game

especially love 1st half overs in Cavalier games

[Goat Milk]

hey fucktard, one is a home dog, one is overall. Lakers as a home dog since 1999 are 1-7 Su and 1-7 ATS, and you can bet EVERY team they had on the floor (except for last years) was better than this one they have now. So I dont care who was playing or why. When theyre a home dog there is a reason, because trust me books know every penetrating clueless idiot like you who cant wait to piss money away on the lakers bets them when they are a dog, and twice as much when they are a home dog.

As far as 'capping he game', useless. because kobe is on the team, and you never know what he is gong to do. He might jack up 50 shots, you also dont know if he is going to be hot or not. You cant cap that. Nor can you handicap ron artest going 3-20 from the 3 point line, which is a distinct possibility.

capping the NBA is for suckers, you look at two teams you look at how books grade them and you go from there. Lakers always over rated even when theyre a dog. Spurs have been at least 3 point favs against everyone but the Clippers at Staples where they were the same -1 they are here. Last I checked Clippers were a much better team than the lakers at this point. But then again Clippers also blew out San Antonio that night as well.

Seriously this line should really be -4, but books are scared to put that number up because of the name on the jersey.

I can bet that most of the time they were home dogs were in the 05 and 06 seasons when Kwame Brown, Smush Parker, and Chris Mihm were in the starting lineup. Nuff said.

[vaas187]

Yes, just as I thought, you're an idiot. Please delete.

So it went from 1-7 since 1999 to 7-7 since 2008. Lmfao. You're an idiot. Stop using these stupid ass trends. They're meaningless bro. We're the exact same players on those teams? No right? So if u see the roulette board that says its been black 15 times in a row, what r u gonna bet black again? My point is each game is independent. See what happened to your initial argument when u posted 1-7 since 1999 and then u changed to 7-7 since 2008. Don't look at trends from 1999 or 2008 or whatever, just cap the game.

To that point? How many times have you seen 6 blacks and everyone crowds the table playing red assuming it HAS to change and it hits black again LOL

[DDK997]

hey fucktard, one is a home dog, one is overall. Lakers as a home dog since 1999 are 1-7 Su and 1-7 ATS, and you can bet EVERY team they had on the floor (except for last years) was better than this one they have now. So I dont care who was playing or why. When theyre a home dog there is a reason, because trust me books know every penetrating clueless idiot like you who cant wait to piss money away on the lakers bets them when they are a dog, and twice as much when they are a home dog.

As far as 'capping he game', useless. because kobe is on the team, and you never know what he is gong to do. He might jack up 50 shots, you also dont know if he is going to be hot or not. You cant cap that. Nor can you handicap ron artest going 3-20 from the 3 point line, which is a distinct possibility.

capping the NBA is for suckers, you look at two teams you look at how books grade them and you go from there. Lakers always over rated even when theyre a dog. Spurs have been at least 3 point favs against everyone but the Clippers at Staples where they were the same -1 they are here. Last I checked Clippers were a much better team than the lakers at this point. But then again Clippers also blew out San Antonio that night as well.

Seriously this line should really be -4, but books are scared to put that number up because of the name on the jersey.

Not true, if insiders really believe Spurs will win this game they would have no problem opening this line at -4, but in this case I believe the Lakers will win and win big. Think about it and look what the public sees (Lakers have beaten no one but scrub teams, Spurs are the best team in the league, Spurs is the LOCK of the day, Spurs -1 is the play of the year, Spurs only lost to the Clippers) *bookies all laugh

Trends are dumb and hate how these "experts" use it to predict the outcome of their "angles" and "adjust accordingly blah blah blah" fine example with this is drbobsports, who completely have gone down the crapper the past five years and still uses this terrible plan, just check out his score prediction for proof. Absolutely horrible crapper.

[daimoshokage]

kobe is apeshit mad with the d'antoni hire.. he wants jackson.. 11 rings > 0 ring.. will submarine the lakers..

[vyomguy]

lakers havent beaten anybody who can actually score

spurs have ton of scorers....heck their bench can beat bottom 5 nba teams...captain jack, green, ginobli...all coming off bench against whom?....jordon hill???, steve blake???...lol

this game wont even be close....spurs will win by double digits.

I am not even talking about the rivalry and how much spurs hate lakers...they want to bury lakers here.

[DDK997]

incase anyone missed it heres what happened at Bookmaker... left side is Spurs, right side Lakers...check out the bold

11/13 01:53 AM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/13 01:23 AM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/13 12:33 AM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/13 12:31 AM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/13 12:31 AM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/13 12:31 AM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/13 12:05 AM	-1 -123	+1 -123
11/12 11:58 PM	-1½ -110	+1 -104
11/12 11:32 PM	-1½ -110	+1½ -110
11/12 11:31 PM	-1½ -103	+1½ -110
11/12 10:43 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 10:19 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 10:17 PM	-1 -115	+1 -110
11/12 09:00 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 08:09 PM	-1½ -110	+1½ -110
11/12 08:08 PM	-1 -110	+1 +100
11/12 07:58 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 07:57 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 07:57 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 07:57 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 07:56 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 07:33 PM	-1 -110	+1 -110
11/12 05:33 PM	PK -110	PK -110
11/12 05:33 PM	PK -110	PK -110
11/12 05:33 PM	PK -110	PK -110
11/12 04:44 PM	PK -110	PK -110
11/12 04:37 PM	PK -110	PK -110
11/12 04:36 PM	-1 -105	+1 -105
11/12 03:58 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:39 PM	+1 -110	-1 +100
11/12 03:35 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:28 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:28 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:26 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:26 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:26 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 03:26 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110
11/12 01:51 PM	+3½ -110	-3½ -110
11/10 12:10 PM	+1 -110	-1 -110

[DDK997]

lakers havent beaten anybody who can actually score

spurs have ton of scorers....heck their bench can beat bottom 5 nba teams...captain jack, green, ginobli...all coming off bench against whom?....jordon hill???, steve blake???...lol

this game wont even be close....spurs will win by double digits.

I am not even talking about the rivalry and how much spurs hate lakers...they want to bury lakers here.

Stop...just stop...Steve Blake is not even playing. Dude just stop.

[vyomguy]

Stop...just stop...Steve Blake is not even playing. Dude just stop.

thats even worse....he is considered one of the best players off their bench.

[kobstopa]

just keep it simple SA it is.
In poker world like they Say it: you think long you think wrong

[sando]

[Mantle7]

Lakers win by double digits.