 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
That last play in Atlanta was a Falcon TD
Did you see the last second desperation attempt by Oakland? They pitched back, back, and back and fumbled the ball which Atlanta picked up in the end zone. They ended the game without a score but if you go back and look at it it should be a Falcon TD thus pushing the spread???
Yes and that would've cashed the OVER as the total would've been 49
nope ill need vid, probaly some illegal play in there, forward lateral or something
wouldn't have kicked an XP though
no ref just blew it dead they only lateraled backwards it was nutsOriginally Posted by ttwarrior1
I had O48.5
I almost shit myself then the ref didn't signal
The ball was clearly in the end zone after the last pitch and Atlanta covered it. I don't know how the ref could be standing right next to the play and not call a TD? That shit was shady as hell...
How many 'Fixed' threads have we seen ?
Took Oakland +9 no sweat
I'll have a video in a minute...
I dont have video in front of me, but remember you cant advance the ball if the kicking team gets possession. I think might have got it at the 1 so advancement into the end zone doesnt count. Play is dead on the 1.
I had falcons -9.5 too
I thought the same thing. Fuk
you can advance a fumble but not a muff, the play by play indicates the raider player was down at the 2 yard line
You can't advance a muff. That wasn't a muff, Oakland already had possession of the ball and was pitching it backwards. It was a fumble and you can most certainly advance a fumble.
The real question was whether the last Raider was down or not. I don't think he was on the ground which means a fumble.
I dont have video in front of me, but remember you cant advance the ball if the kicking team gets possession. I think might have got it at the 1 so advancement into the end zone doesnt count. Play is dead on the 1.
I had falcons -9.5 too
That was a fumble at the goal line. Ref came in and stopped the play early.
looks down though not really high quality enough vid to see for sure, but i think his elbow hit then it popped out immediately
Another in long-line of NFL screwjobs!
Loshak: investigate.
looked down to me
at least hit my usc +3 & raiders +9.5 parlay.
Yeah, I took it from my iphone and was standing at an angle from my TV. I'm too lazy to try again but if you see it on a big screen HD TV it looked like a fumble. He was losing the ball before he fell down, then he shuffled it forward.
Ground can not cause a fumble hence he was down by contact...........
He pitched the ball before he hit the ground. He was trying to extend the play. Why would he wait until he hit the ground? He was trying to pitch the ball in order to keep the play alive. That's why it was fishy for the refs to blow the whistle. It was the last play of the game, Oakland had to go all out on the last play of the game.
your ass pitched the ball,
he hit the ground before the ball came out,
DOWN BY CONTACT!!
Anyhow once the referee blows whistle, down by contact, the play is dead at that INSTANT and CAN NOT BE REVIEWED.....................
Looked down to me too and the ref pointed at the ground. Now the Raider "first down" instead of 4th and a half yard on their last possession...
Reply With Quote
