1. #1
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32291

    SF Giants (Vogelsong) -120 over Arizona (Saunders) is my play tonight

    Expecting -135 with 'Song and the Giants tonight at home, Vegas is offering -120.

    Ryan Vogelsong's 10 start numbers so far this season is solid.
    3-2 with a 2.50 ERA and a tidy 1.22 WH/IP ratio

    Vogelsong is one of the better home park pitchers in the league, loves home cooking.
    In four start at AT&T Vogelsong has a 1.32 ERA, .168 batting average against, .275 on base percentage against (which is more impressive than the .168 ba) and sports a 1.06 WH/IP

    Vogelsong even though the sample size is not huge, has pretty much his way with the Snakes

    ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS CAREER STATISTICS VS. RYAN VOGELSONG
    BATTER AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO AVG OBP SLG OPS
    Henry Blanco 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 .200 .200 .200 .400
    Willie Bloomquist 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 .333 .333 .333 .667
    Geoff Blum 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 .000 1.000 .000 1.000
    Stephen Drew 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .667
    Paul Goldschmidt 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 .000 .167 .000 .167
    Aaron Hill 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .667
    Miguel Montero 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 .333 .333 .333 .667
    Lyle Overbay 10 1 0 0 0 1 3 6 .100 .286 .100 .386
    Gerardo Parra 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 .400 .400 .600 1.000
    Ryan Roberts 8 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 .125 .222 .500 .722
    Justin Upton 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 .167 .375 .167 .542
    Chris Young 8 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 .125 .222 .500 .722
    Totals 65 13 1 0 2 4 8 21 .200 .293 .308 .601

    21 strike outs in 65 AB's or a 1:3 ratio is eye popping.


    Fat Joe Saunders takes the ball for the Snakes tonight.

    Not having a great season, not having a crap season.
    3-3 overall, 3.79 ERA and 1.30 WH/IP ratio is pretty much league average, little better, not quite Vogelsong's numbers.

    However, even though the Giants are not going to be remembers as Murderers Row, they flat out own Saunders.


    PA AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS SH SF IBB HBP GDP missG
    Aubrey Huff 27 26 11 0 0 0 1 1 2 .423 .444 .423 .868 0 0 0 0 0
    Melky Cabrera 21 17 5 1 0 0 1 3 3 .294 .400 .353 .753 1 0 1 0 0
    Ryan Theriot 11 9 6 1 0 0 0 2 0 .667 .727 .778 1.505 0 0 0 0 0
    Gregor Blanco 6 6 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 .333 .333 .333 .667 0 0 0 0 0
    Brett Pill 6 6 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 .333 .333 .833 1.167 0 0 0 0 0
    Joaquin Arias 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .400 .400 .400 .800 0 0 0 0 0
    Matt Cain 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 .200 .200 .200 .400 0 0 0 0 0
    Brandon Belt 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 .750 .750 .750 1.500 0 0 0 0 0
    Brandon Crawford 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 .500 .667 1.000 1.667 0 0 1 0 0
    Angel Pagan 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .667 0 0 0 0 0
    Buster Posey 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 .500 .667 2.000 2.667 0 0 0 0 1
    Hector Sanchez 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .667 0 0 0 0 0
    Madison Bumgarner 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0
    Barry Zito 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0
    Total 101 92 36 3 0 2 9 8 9 .391 .440 .489 .929 1 0 2 0 1


    OK, this is what we have here, a better starting pitcher (Vogelsong) at home, where he does his best work, against a mediocre pitcher, that the Giants can hit.

    Love this play, laying 360 to win 300 on the Giants with Ryan Vogelsong.

  2. #2
    onacloud
    onacloud's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-14-10
    Posts: 5,360

    I'm on it as well

  3. #3
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    So with all that being said, why are the Giants only -120?

  4. #4
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32291

    ^
    Probably because SF doesn't have a reputation of murdering the ball.

  5. #5
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    BOL

  6. #6
    CollegeOverUnder
    DJ COOPER
    CollegeOverUnder's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-20-10
    Posts: 5,520
    Betpoints: 217

    Liking the Giants also

  7. #7
    EXhoosier10
    EXhoosier10's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-06-09
    Posts: 3,122
    Betpoints: 4390

    Steve, I still don't understand why you pull up batter v. pitcher stats every time you look at a game. Out of all that guys who have studied this stuff, none have found any significant correlation between previous AB's to future AB's, ESPECIALLY after < 10 ABs.

    Each time you throw in the "even though the sample size is not huge" part, but then you factor it into your capping by saying "against a mediocre pitcher, that the Giants can hit."

    In reality, there has been no data to prove that the Giants will fare any better than their previous career/3yr avg/whatever they have in their past 500+ ABs.

    I'm not saying you don't make good plays, but unless you know more than others, I don't understand why you keep bringing up Batter v. pitcher stuff. If you'd like, I can find some research on the topic for you.

  8. #8
    MileHigh_Broncos
    MileHigh_Broncos's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-22-09
    Posts: 127
    Betpoints: 36

    Vogelsong 2-1 with a 2.05 ERA in four career starts versus the Diamondbacks.

    Saunders is 0-4 with a 5.23 ERA in five career starts against the NL West rivals.

    I got the d-backs tho, go figure.
    I guess I'm still holding out that vogelsong retracts back to his career 4.49ERA and 1.44 WHIP... the d-backs bats continue/return to be on fire tonight! 2-11 with RISP last night... yuk.

  9. #9
    CHR1S
    CHR1S's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-20-12
    Posts: 106
    Betpoints: 715

    stevenash, from what site did you get that [Pitcher vs. Other team] stats?

  10. #10
    Monitor-Tan
    Tony Romo of Daily Fantasy
    Monitor-Tan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-11
    Posts: 4,460
    Betpoints: 428

    Quote Originally Posted by hirania View Post
    I work as an oddsmaker and analyst in one of the largest bookmakers in the market. I have excellent results in selecting American sports, especially NBA and MLB. I coordinate trends of the courses and each day I have a lot of information that reaches me more or less confidence. As an employee of bookmakers a managerial position I have different access to fix matches.

    Persons interested in my carefully selected tips should transfer money in my account in PayPal, Neteller, Skrill (Moneybokers).

    Signup includes 2-3 tips of carefully selected each day. The cost of subscription is 50 $ per week or 150 $ per month. I give sports betting a few hours before the start of matches.

    You can pay: PayPal, Moneybookers, Neteller

    Contact: sportanalyst[]hushmail . com


    Is this a joke..

  11. #11
    Bluedragon
    Bluedragon's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-30-10
    Posts: 3,484
    Betpoints: 531

    Quote Originally Posted by hirania View Post
    I work as an oddsmaker and analyst in one of the largest bookmakers in the market. I have excellent results in selecting American sports, especially NBA and MLB. I coordinate trends of the courses and each day I have a lot of information that reaches me more or less confidence. As an employee of bookmakers a managerial position I have different access to fix matches.

    Persons interested in my carefully selected tips should transfer money in my account in PayPal, Neteller, Skrill (Moneybokers).

    Signup includes 2-3 tips of carefully selected each day. The cost of subscription is 50 $ per week or 150 $ per month. I give sports betting a few hours before the start of matches.

    You can pay: PayPal, Moneybookers, Neteller

    Contact: sportanalyst[]hushmail . com
    can i just give you my bank details and you can withdraw direct from my account as you send me tips? easier that way...

  12. #12
    vaas187
    vaas187's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-01-12
    Posts: 2,280

    shut the **** up you dweeb

  13. #13
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by EXhoosier10 View Post
    Steve, I still don't understand why you pull up batter v. pitcher stats every time you look at a game. Out of all that guys who have studied this stuff, none have found any significant correlation between previous AB's to future AB's, ESPECIALLY after < 10 ABs.

    Each time you throw in the "even though the sample size is not huge" part, but then you factor it into your capping by saying "against a mediocre pitcher, that the Giants can hit."

    In reality, there has been no data to prove that the Giants will fare any better than their previous career/3yr avg/whatever they have in their past 500+ ABs.

    I'm not saying you don't make good plays, but unless you know more than others, I don't understand why you keep bringing up Batter v. pitcher stuff. If you'd like, I can find some research on the topic for you.

    EX, you know I love you buddy, and I do get your point, I use that data because I get a feel of what a collective unit can do based on what they have done in the past. Of course there are adjustments made, but if three hitters in the same line up has had success against a particular pitcher, I have found they will continue to have success, not always, but usually.

    Let me cite an example, you know I do the fantasy baseball thing well, last night I used Kelly Johnson at 2B.
    Now, Kelly Johnson is a nice second baseman, better than average, but when you think 2B, you think Phillips, Cano, Pedroia (when healthy) Kinsler........ before you consider Kelly Johnson, right?

    Tommy Hunter versus Kelly Johnson
    KJ is 6 for 4 lifetime v. Hunter, 3 HR 5 RBI.
    Knowing this going in, why wouldn't one use Kelly Johnson at 2B, right?

    How'd Johnson do last night against Tommy Hunter?
    http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/boxsco...onto-blue-jays
    He had a *monster* game.
    He was the difference between chump change for me last night and a decent 125 dollar cash.

    Now, for example, if you have a Markakis, Adam Jones, and say, a JJ Hardy all with a .350 plus lifetime average 15+ AB's, against say a Masterson or somebody, why wouldn't you want to use Baltimore, considering the O's don't send out a gas can (and a few other factors)

    Point being, the data I use is not the be all, end all in my final 'capping decision, but I do consider it.

  14. #14
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by Monitor-Tan View Post
    Is this a joke..
    I just reported him.
    I can pick losers by myself and you don't have to pay for them.

    Is Shari on?

  15. #15
    vaas187
    vaas187's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-01-12
    Posts: 2,280

    who cares what the line is...how many ******* times have they pushed a line to -200 or something stupid and the team gets completely destroyed. lines dont mean shit, even line movement doesnt mean shit.

  16. #16
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    Quote Originally Posted by MileHigh_Broncos View Post
    Vogelsong 2-1 with a 2.05 ERA in four career starts versus the Diamondbacks.

    Saunders is 0-4 with a 5.23 ERA in five career starts against the NL West rivals.

    I got the d-backs tho, go figure.
    I guess I'm still holding out that vogelsong retracts back to his career 4.49ERA and 1.44 WHIP... the d-backs bats continue/return to be on fire tonight! 2-11 with RISP last night... yuk.
    Alot has been made of the regression analysis, lately. I don't know if this coincides with aznbluff's thread in this forum. Don't get me wrong - regression to the mean happens. The hard part is knowing when. Having said all that, the last I checked about 70% of ML is on the Giants, yet the line has been going down...And just like regression, RLMs are not always a sure thing in and of itself.

  17. #17
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by EVPlus View Post
    Alot has been made of the regression analysis, lately. I don't know if this coincides with aznbluff's thread in this forum. Don't get me wrong - regression to the mean happens. The hard part is knowing when. Having said all that, the last I checked about 70% of ML is on the Giants, yet the line has been going down...And just like regression, RLMs are not always a sure thing in and of itself.
    Part of what you are saying is why I am using Arieta and Baltimore tonight.
    I'll explain later, I got to get in some fantasy lineups, I like SF and Orioles tonight, many might miss why I like the O's too, but I do *in this spot*

  18. #18
    a4u2fear
    TEASE IT
    a4u2fear's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-29-10
    Posts: 8,147
    Betpoints: 35459

    thanks Steve, lets get em!

  19. #19
    Smutbucket
    Smutbucket's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-08
    Posts: 3,956
    Betpoints: 13748

    Quote Originally Posted by EVPlus View Post
    Alot has been made of the regression analysis, lately. I don't know if this coincides with aznbluff's thread in this forum. Don't get me wrong - regression to the mean happens. The hard part is knowing when. Having said all that, the last I checked about 70% of ML is on the Giants, yet the line has been going down...And just like regression, RLMs are not always a sure thing in and of itself.
    In my opinion, Moving Line is only an attempt to balance the books and minimize losses. now just because 70% (in certain books) are on a certain team doesnt mean, there is more money on a certain team than the other. This is common sense yet people continue to "stress" "question" "ponder" over "line movements" or atleast their interpetations of them.

    I agree with vaaas . you "interpeted RLM" DONT MEAN SHIT!

    and I like this pick steve nash. and I think past Batter vs Pitcher performance is a great way to see how certain batters and hitters matchup against each other.

  20. #20
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 94,068
    Betpoints: 7696

    On other side. Zona my biggest mlb play tonight. Gl.

  21. #21
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    Quote Originally Posted by Smutbucket View Post
    In my opinion, Moving Line is only an attempt to balance the books and minimize losses. now just because 70% (in certain books) are on a certain team doesnt mean, there is more money on a certain team than the other. This is common sense yet people continue to "stress" "question" "ponder" over "line movements" or atleast their interpetations of them.

    I agree with vaaas . you "interpeted RLM" DONT MEAN SHIT!

    and I like this pick steve nash. and I think past Batter vs Pitcher performance is a great way to see how certain batters and hitters matchup against each other.
    There's no need to be a dick about it. I specifically stated "RLMs are not always a sure thing in and of itself."

    What that means (if you're not stoned right now and somewhat logical) is that sometimes RLMs can and should be factored into the capping and other times it should be ignored.

    There...straightforward enough for you...?

    Now put the bong down and working on your reading comprehension.

    And btw, aren't you the one going through a cold streak...? So who are you to lecture anyone regarding what to look at and what to ignore in a given situation...?

  22. #22
    Br0nxer
    July 2012 Poster of the Month
    Br0nxer's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-25-11
    Posts: 13,665
    Betpoints: 888

    got the dbacks in a 3 teamer

    angels ML
    Spurs ML

  23. #23
    Smutbucket
    Smutbucket's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-08
    Posts: 3,956
    Betpoints: 13748

    How was I being a dick? I gave you my opinion. you obviously have strong opinions about marijuana. maybe you should smoke a bit and relax and then maybe you wouldnt get so worked up over someone else opinion, although maybe in your mind that would be you just being "illogical"
    keep reguritating bullshit you learned from the media, you believe smoking marijuana kills braincells dont you?

  24. #24
    Brock Landers
    Forever in Debt to your Priceless Advice
    Brock Landers's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-30-08
    Posts: 45,360
    Betpoints: 8792

    SF trying to score runs is like pulling fukking teeth

  25. #25
    bigant78
    bigant78's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-13-12
    Posts: 185
    Betpoints: 572

    brock it is depressing watching the giants. i got them as well and took the chance on the runline.

  26. #26
    Smutbucket
    Smutbucket's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-08
    Posts: 3,956
    Betpoints: 13748

    and honestly Im getting really freaking tired of people talking about RLM's like it has an effect in the game.

    CAUSE and EFFECT people!

    I may be on a cold streak but I atleast understand what factors have effect on games, and no amount of public perception will change it.

  27. #27
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    Quote Originally Posted by Smutbucket View Post
    How was I being a dick? I gave you my opinion. you obviously have strong opinions about marijuana. maybe you should smoke a bit and relax and then maybe you wouldnt get so worked up over someone else opinion, although maybe in your mind that would be you just being "illogical"
    keep reguritating bullshit you learned from the media, you believe smoking marijuana kills braincells dont you?
    You were out of line by misinterpreting what I stated calling it bull shit rather than trying to have a civil discussion.

    And I happen to know plenty of folks who recreationally 420. I also believe it has important medical applications such as cancer patients.

    It's dumb pot heads that I have zero tolerance for. This joke of a rebuttal of yours just confirms that.

    And if you're naive enough to believe that line movements should never ever be considered before pulling the trigger, it won't surprise me if I see another thread from you down the road about how you've gone cold and I wish you a long life of being a break-even bettor.

    Line movements can be telling in certain situations; in others, it's just white noise.

    Have another hit and enjoy your myopic existence.

  28. #28
    Smutbucket
    Smutbucket's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-08
    Posts: 3,956
    Betpoints: 13748

    yes obviously you can tell everything about my existence from the fact that my status says "smoke weed everyday" and my opinion on RLM's.....

    get a grip dude....

    so much hate on these forums its funny....people have an opinion and someone else has a different one and they start trying to attack anything they can about them, its hilarious.....

    people need to lighten up...

    literally, your being REDICULOUS at this point....

  29. #29
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    Quote Originally Posted by Smutbucket View Post
    and honestly Im getting really freaking tired of people talking about RLM's like it has an effect in the game.

    CAUSE and EFFECT people!

    I may be on a cold streak but I atleast understand what factors have effect on games, and no amount of public perception will change it.
    Your interpretation is too black and white. There are shades of gray. Those who blindly chase steam or RLMs are mistaken. And those who flat out deny their occasional significance are just as mistaken.

  30. #30
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    Quote Originally Posted by Smutbucket View Post
    yes obviously you can tell everything about my existence from the fact that my status says "smoke weed everyday" and my opinion on RLM's.....

    get a grip dude....

    so much hate on these forums its funny....people have an opinion and someone else has a different one and they start trying to attack anything they can about them, its hilarious.....

    people need to lighten up...

    literally, your being REDICULOUS at this point....

    Your hypocrisy is amusing and a little sad. As I stated, you could've disputed what I stated about line movements in a civil tone. Yet you didn't. And now, here you are, back peddaling and trying to accuse me of the very characteristic which you displayed.

    And I didn't just attack anything about you. I pegged you as the narrow-minded type of pot smoker. Each of your subsequent posts just confirms that. And btw, shouldn't you be the one that's taking all this in stride if you're the one toking up...?

    Cheer up. It's still a 1-run game. Giants can win this one and you can feel good about yourself in your myopic bliss.

    p.s. The word is spelled ridiculous with an "i". So if you choose to ignore a discussion on line movments, at least you did get a lesson in spelling.
    Last edited by EVPlus; 05-29-12 at 11:14 PM.

  31. #31
    CollegeOverUnder
    DJ COOPER
    CollegeOverUnder's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-20-10
    Posts: 5,520
    Betpoints: 217

    Lets go Giants I'm sweating my balls off in this game right now!

  32. #32
    Brock Landers
    Forever in Debt to your Priceless Advice
    Brock Landers's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-30-08
    Posts: 45,360
    Betpoints: 8792

    incredible they only score 1 fukking run there. Fukking terrible

  33. #33
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 94,068
    Betpoints: 7696

    dbacks got this

  34. #34
    CollegeOverUnder
    DJ COOPER
    CollegeOverUnder's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-20-10
    Posts: 5,520
    Betpoints: 217

    bottom of the 8th lets go Giants

  35. #35
    ebelisle22
    ebelisle22's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-11
    Posts: 4,726
    Betpoints: 61

    i will absolutely lose it if they dont get a run here.

12 Last
Top