[cdaniels24]

Cubs end their losing streak today. Suppan been pitching like his wife is cheating on him.

CHC -1.5 +120

[KingJD31]

The mistake is that they didn't open the line higher.

hahah Jesus Christ Vegas got you guys brainwashed they could have put 20 you would have liked the over

[yisman]

hahah Jesus Christ Vegas got you guys brainwashed they could have put 20 you would have liked the over

Let's see. They opened it at 12.5 and then moved it to 13. So yes, they should've opened it higher. Are you new to sports betting?

[KingJD31]

Haha you didn't mean it should have been higher cause the public was pounding over, you were just trying to be another wannabe sharp predicting this goes over by a landslide

[mh217]

both teams are trash but wrigley is a band box on days like this..over or no play.

[Dark Horse]

hahah Jesus Christ Vegas got you guys brainwashed they could have put 20 you would have liked the over

Typical example of everybody betting on the wind. The way these teams have been playing a total of 6 runs might be expected under neutral conditions. The two pitchers, under normal conditions, might give up a combined total of about 10-11 runs. But I have them both pitching better than that. So we'll see. Either the simple wind angle wins this for the over, or more indepth handicapping will.

[B1GER1C828]

lol who cares who the public is on squarest shit you can do, either you know the GM or you don't, you're gonna tell me you feel good taking padres cubs over 13? I would never ever take that

theres a bigger percent of people on the under pal. your a clueless fuk.

bigger percent of people on under, yet line moves to 13 and you think your sharp or something?

[rm18]

Carlos Quentin starting Padres are free money

[KingJD31]

theres a bigger percent of people on the under pal. your a clueless fuk.

bigger percent of people on under, yet line moves to 13 and you think your sharp or something?

stfu \*\*\*\*\*\* I don't look who the public is over, I see 2 fuking shitty offenses getting 13runs shitbag

[B1GER1C828]

stfu \*\*\*\*\*\* I don't look who the public is over, I see 2 fuking shitty offenses getting 13runs shitbag

[yisman]

Haha you didn't mean it should have been higher cause the public was pounding over, you were just trying to be another wannabe sharp predicting this goes over by a landslide

Where did I say it would go over by a landslide? Did you ever learn how to read?

stfu \*\*\*\*\*\* I don't look who the public is over, I see 2 fuking shitty offenses getting 13runs shitbag

Priceless.

[KingJD31]

Here they come fellas the 1927 Yankees
Will venable
Chris denorfia
Yonder Alonso
Carlos Quintin
Chase headley
Nick hundley
Everth Cabrera
Andy parrino

[nikossf]

The odds in this game are adjusted for a late-summer game huh???..
Cubs -141 with an o/u at 13 now!!
Definitely seems adjusted for some other factors into play. winds/weather/terrible pitching/mem. day?/idk..
Cubs fav. @ -140 or higher after losing so many games in a row.. Padres on the road,terrible offense. None of this makes sense right???

Well....Im rollin' with it.. Cubs for the win and the over.. Vegas adjusts this shit with a lot more experts eying this shit than I probley can.. They have a reason to adjust this so high.

[face]

under 13 +105 for me

[BigDaddy]

http://beyondthebets.com/2012/05/20/...en-profitable/


Sometimes perception isn’t reality.

Over the last few years, it’s been widely believed that betting the over on high totals at Wrigley Field has been profitable. By “high totals,” we’re referring to those that are 10 runs or more, a result of heavy winds blowing out in what’s already considered to be one of the best hitters’ ballparks in baseball.

A 10-game stretch in 2010—one that saw 10 straight games with double digit totals go over by an average of 3.45 runs—likely contributed to this belief.

But over the last decade, it’s actually been a better bet to go under on wind-inflated totals.

Since 2002, the over on totals of 10 or more is just 94-101-6, a rate of 48 percent. The sub .500 win percentage—combined with the added juice—isn’t close to profitable.

The total in today’s Cubs-White Sox game closed at 11.5. It’s the highest Wrigley over/under of the season, but we’re sure to see plenty more inflated numbers in the months to come.

If the plan was to blindly bet the over, you might want to reconsider that strategy.

[Winning oasis]

The o/u for Home Runs is 1.5 on Bovada.

[mh217]

The o/u for Home Runs is 1.5 on Bovada.

Now that makes sense

[russiaboss]

Got the over

GL

[yisman]

The o/u for Home Runs is 1.5 on Bovada.

I just went to bovada and they don't have a line for homers

[mh217]

Fukerrs posting fake lines?

[KingJD31]

Does 5dimes even look at starting lineups, maybin no hits +180

[Smogs]

No way this hits 13

[yisman]

I wish a book had o/u 1.5 homers

[BigDaddy]

I wish a book had o/u 1.5 homers

i'll let you bet over 3 -170

you can risk up to 510 to win 300

i have 300 points in the sbr book

as long as you confirm soon before another HR is hit

[BigDaddy]

line is now OVER 4 -170

HR just hit

[BigDaddy]

Will Venable one-out, solo Home Run (4) to right. Chris Denorfia due up.

[BigDaddy]

actually its a bad bet

taking the offer down.

[yisman]

would've bet it oh well

easy bet at wrigley

[BigDaddy]

make a better line and might accept

4 is to easy even with it being -170

[8ArIvd5]

Over

[yisman]

make a better line and might accept

4 is to easy even with it being -170

only homers from 4-9 count

I would take over 1.5 (-120)

[BigDaddy]

that is worse for me than over 4 -170

you would have over 3.5 -120

no way

[BigDaddy]

another HR hit

[KingJD31]

This GM is torture

[yisman]

ok didn't know how many homers were hit

only homers 5-9 count, I get over 2 homers (-120)