nice reasoning.Originally Posted by lakerboy
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
03-16-12 04:09 PM #36
-
03-16-12 04:11 PM #37
You don't see a No. 3 seed favored by 3 against a 14 very often -- if ever. Originally Posted by crustyme
nice reasoning.
-
03-16-12 04:13 PM #38
needed GT to finish off a 5 team parlay. YAY.
-
03-16-12 04:14 PM #39
i think u got this.
only down 18.
-
03-16-12 04:16 PM #40
No point in trying to be cute with picking upsets. Getting 3 points with a #14 seed. What a joke.
Just fade all these mid-majors till the end. They'll lose sooner or later. They got overrated because of last year.
-
03-16-12 04:17 PM #41
...
easy fukkin money
all the "sharp" dumbfukks were on belmont
team didn't even belong on the same court with gtownLast edited by sbr.rodrigo; 03-10-15 at 10:32 AM.
-
03-16-12 04:23 PM #42
Brutal for the over the refs not calling that goal tend the over is a push.... ref was like fukk it its a blowout
-
03-16-12 04:35 PM #43
Says the guy laying -118 juice and talking like he's a big timer betting $393 Originally Posted by Br0nxer
...
easy fukkin money
all the "sharp" dumbfukks were on belmont
team didn't even belong on the same court with gtown
Last edited by sbr.rodrigo; 03-10-15 at 10:32 AM.
-
03-16-12 04:37 PM #44
says the fukkin guy no one knows who probably bets 5 bucks a game Originally Posted by grizzlies1
Says the guy laying -118 juice and talking like he's a big timer betting $393
felt like buying the hook. it would of been so much smarter to lay 3.5 had they won by 3 you dumb fukk
-
03-16-12 04:37 PM #45I'd never gamble again for Taylor Swift
Become A Pro!
Join Date: 08-31-11Posts: 12,722Betpoints: 14
Nothing on Belmont's schedule suggested they were about even with Georgetown.
Don't understand people trying to out think themselves. No idea why Vegas set this line at 3 when it should have been 6-7 but I'm sure they got enough people laying off or betting on Belmont out of confusion.
-
03-16-12 04:38 PM #46I'd never gamble again for Taylor Swift
Join Date: 08-31-11Posts: 12,722Betpoints: 14
I buy the hook whenever I get the urge too now. Had the urge to buy the hook from -1.5 on Ohio a week back and didn't and they win by 1 on two missed free throws at the end. Should always trust the gut! Originally Posted by Br0nxer
-
03-16-12 04:38 PM #47
Like I was saying, why take a team when you haven't watched them play? Originally Posted by BigDofBA
It was really obvious Belmont didn't match up from the get go.
No one had any reason for taking Belmont. These was an ass kicking.
-
03-16-12 04:38 PM #48
Originally Posted by No coincidences
What's your point? No reason to take belmont here. It was either Georgetown or no play
-
03-16-12 04:39 PM #49
Originally Posted by grizzlies1
Says the guy laying -118 juice and talking like he's a big timer betting $393
...
racking up big winners while your in mommies basement rolling pennies for post up money
ya ever have more than 5 bucks on a game kid
Last edited by sbr.rodrigo; 03-10-15 at 10:33 AM.
-
03-16-12 04:40 PM #50
Originally Posted by k13
I would just stay away from teams like VCU that have shown real ability in the tournament
-
03-16-12 04:41 PM #51
it only makes sense Originally Posted by PickWinnerAllDay
love guys on here who don't have two cents to there name or whose unit size is 7.50 talking shit cause someone bet into -118
gotta love it. only at sbr
-
03-16-12 04:42 PM #52
For starters, I don't put money on A team when their best win was against Marshall, they played no one all year, and they match up horrible with he opponent just because he line looks fishy. Originally Posted by TheLock
I doubt most of the people that took them had really even watched them play.
-
03-16-12 04:47 PM #53
True say bud. What's with all the brutal lines this week? Are the regular oddsmakers on vacation??? Originally Posted by BigDofBA
-
03-16-12 04:49 PM #54
LB, stick to the NBA man, u kill it there. Taking Belmont isn't equivalent to taking the Suns last night or the Bulls a couple days ago. It's the playoffs. And it's all kids playing. GL
-
03-16-12 04:50 PM #55
Originally Posted by Illusivecone
10+ seeds are getting wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much respect so far
I made a thread about this but 3 seeds traditionally win their matchups at about an 85% clip (which translates to -600 moneylines) yet the MLs for the 3 seeds have averaged about - 270
-
03-16-12 04:50 PM #56
I'll take Kentucky over VCU if they make it that far but that's just me. Originally Posted by brahmabull117
-
03-16-12 04:51 PM #57
Originally Posted by k13
Agreed on Kentucky but that's probably about it
I totally agree with you though on dogs getting too much respect. The line on this game should have been aorund -600
-
03-16-12 04:52 PM #58
Another terrible bet by lakerboy.
-
03-16-12 04:53 PM #59
Why was gtown only giving 3? That was too easy
-
03-16-12 04:54 PM #60
Exactly, parity maybe in but these moneylines are really low. Ohio State vs Gonzaga only -300, they can have my money if Gonzaga wins. Originally Posted by brahmabull117
-
03-16-12 04:55 PM #61
Why didn't I see you in this thread before the game? Monday morning quarterback much? Originally Posted by jmathes
Another terrible bet by lakerboy.
-
03-16-12 04:55 PM #62
Vegas just toying with people. Originally Posted by Smoke
-
03-16-12 04:56 PM #63
Originally Posted by k13
How about michigan - 235?
that line should be about 350 as well
-
03-16-12 04:58 PM #64
Originally Posted by BigDofBA
guy like apricot sinner woulda put his life savings on belmont only if he had a life savings
kid doesn't have 2 fukkin cents to his name
then after it lost kid woulda said it was still the right play
can't make this shit up. only at sbr. the land of dumbfukk hamburgers
-
03-16-12 04:59 PM #65I'd never gamble again for Taylor Swift
Join Date: 08-31-11Posts: 12,722Betpoints: 14
I"m going to start doubling my bet total when I see lakerboy on the opposite side of me. Never fails. Originally Posted by Br0nxer
guy like apricot sinner woulda put his life savings on belmont only if he had a life savings
kid doesn't have 2 fukkin cents to his name
-
03-16-12 05:00 PM #66
That one actually scares me because I have a all #4 seeds win in the first round prop... Originally Posted by brahmabull117
-
03-16-12 05:03 PM #67
Originally Posted by k13
That one actually scares me because I have a all #4 seeds win in the first round prop...
what line did you get on that? Usually that's about a 50-50 proposition considering that 4 seeds win about 78% of their first round matchups
-
03-16-12 05:04 PM #68
Originally Posted by PickWinnerAllDay
-
03-16-12 05:07 PM #69
+250 Originally Posted by brahmabull117
I also got All #3 seeds win first round at +300 or so.
-
03-16-12 05:08 PM #70
Originally Posted by k13
I don't understand how it's possible to get +300 on 3 seeds but +250 on four seeds. 4 seeds are inferior teams with more difficult matchups, shouldn't it be the other way?
In any case, both lines are fantastic value. Like I said, 4 seeds winning all 4 games is about a 50-50 proposition so +250 is awesome
Reply With Quote